Interobserver variability in physician-modified endograft planning by comparison with a three-dimensional printed aortic model

Issam Koleilat, Michael Jaeggli, Joseph A. Ewing, Mark Androes, Dan T. Simionescu, John Eidt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background With the increasing application of fenestrated and physician-modified endografting for aneurysm repair, there is increasing concern about the accuracy of vessel position measurements based on computed tomography scans. Inaccuracies in measurements may result in a “window-shutter” or “eclipsing” phenomenon whereby the fenestration may not overlie the vessel ostium completely. We hypothesized that vessel position measurements from reconstructed imaging do not represent the true vessel position as obtained from a three-dimensional (3D) printed physical model of the visceral aortic segment. Methods Medical 3D modeling software was used to develop the 3D reconstructions, which were then exported to the 3D printing software. This allowed 3D models to be physically generated. The distances to the top and bottom and the angle of each of the celiac, superior mesenteric, right renal, and left renal arteries were recorded. These same measurements were obtained by each of the blinded reviewers in addition to the aortic diameter at the midpoint of each of these vessels. Measurements were compared with intraclass correlation coefficient, nonparametric Spearman rank correlation test, and one-sample t-test to assess accuracy and precision. Statistical significance was set at P < .05 for all tests. Results Both the individual measurements and the average of the measurements were statistically accurate (significant) for the bottom of the superior mesenteric artery and the top and bottom of both the right and left renal arteries. There was variability and inaccuracy in all visceral vessel angles and in the bottom of the celiac artery (the top and the angle of the celiac artery were the arbitrary referents). Conclusions Whereas the visceral vessel orifices are largely accurately assessed and measured, the vessel angles are not. This may lead to an eclipsing phenomenon, which may contribute to branch or fenestrated vessel failure and therefore reintervention. Further efforts should assess the clinical significance of the eclipsing phenomenon and should target accurate and appropriate fenestration construction to prevent long-term morbidity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1789-1796
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Vascular Surgery
Volume64
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Celiac Artery
Observer Variation
Renal Artery
Software
Physicians
Superior Mesenteric Artery
Nonparametric Statistics
Abdomen
Aneurysm
Tomography
Morbidity
Kidney
Three Dimensional Printing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Interobserver variability in physician-modified endograft planning by comparison with a three-dimensional printed aortic model. / Koleilat, Issam; Jaeggli, Michael; Ewing, Joseph A.; Androes, Mark; Simionescu, Dan T.; Eidt, John.

In: Journal of Vascular Surgery, Vol. 64, No. 6, 01.12.2016, p. 1789-1796.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Koleilat, Issam ; Jaeggli, Michael ; Ewing, Joseph A. ; Androes, Mark ; Simionescu, Dan T. ; Eidt, John. / Interobserver variability in physician-modified endograft planning by comparison with a three-dimensional printed aortic model. In: Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2016 ; Vol. 64, No. 6. pp. 1789-1796.
@article{bb03724b78b94599bcbe6b4f2cdbc593,
title = "Interobserver variability in physician-modified endograft planning by comparison with a three-dimensional printed aortic model",
abstract = "Background With the increasing application of fenestrated and physician-modified endografting for aneurysm repair, there is increasing concern about the accuracy of vessel position measurements based on computed tomography scans. Inaccuracies in measurements may result in a “window-shutter” or “eclipsing” phenomenon whereby the fenestration may not overlie the vessel ostium completely. We hypothesized that vessel position measurements from reconstructed imaging do not represent the true vessel position as obtained from a three-dimensional (3D) printed physical model of the visceral aortic segment. Methods Medical 3D modeling software was used to develop the 3D reconstructions, which were then exported to the 3D printing software. This allowed 3D models to be physically generated. The distances to the top and bottom and the angle of each of the celiac, superior mesenteric, right renal, and left renal arteries were recorded. These same measurements were obtained by each of the blinded reviewers in addition to the aortic diameter at the midpoint of each of these vessels. Measurements were compared with intraclass correlation coefficient, nonparametric Spearman rank correlation test, and one-sample t-test to assess accuracy and precision. Statistical significance was set at P < .05 for all tests. Results Both the individual measurements and the average of the measurements were statistically accurate (significant) for the bottom of the superior mesenteric artery and the top and bottom of both the right and left renal arteries. There was variability and inaccuracy in all visceral vessel angles and in the bottom of the celiac artery (the top and the angle of the celiac artery were the arbitrary referents). Conclusions Whereas the visceral vessel orifices are largely accurately assessed and measured, the vessel angles are not. This may lead to an eclipsing phenomenon, which may contribute to branch or fenestrated vessel failure and therefore reintervention. Further efforts should assess the clinical significance of the eclipsing phenomenon and should target accurate and appropriate fenestration construction to prevent long-term morbidity.",
author = "Issam Koleilat and Michael Jaeggli and Ewing, {Joseph A.} and Mark Androes and Simionescu, {Dan T.} and John Eidt",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jvs.2015.09.044",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "1789--1796",
journal = "Journal of Vascular Surgery",
issn = "0741-5214",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interobserver variability in physician-modified endograft planning by comparison with a three-dimensional printed aortic model

AU - Koleilat, Issam

AU - Jaeggli, Michael

AU - Ewing, Joseph A.

AU - Androes, Mark

AU - Simionescu, Dan T.

AU - Eidt, John

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - Background With the increasing application of fenestrated and physician-modified endografting for aneurysm repair, there is increasing concern about the accuracy of vessel position measurements based on computed tomography scans. Inaccuracies in measurements may result in a “window-shutter” or “eclipsing” phenomenon whereby the fenestration may not overlie the vessel ostium completely. We hypothesized that vessel position measurements from reconstructed imaging do not represent the true vessel position as obtained from a three-dimensional (3D) printed physical model of the visceral aortic segment. Methods Medical 3D modeling software was used to develop the 3D reconstructions, which were then exported to the 3D printing software. This allowed 3D models to be physically generated. The distances to the top and bottom and the angle of each of the celiac, superior mesenteric, right renal, and left renal arteries were recorded. These same measurements were obtained by each of the blinded reviewers in addition to the aortic diameter at the midpoint of each of these vessels. Measurements were compared with intraclass correlation coefficient, nonparametric Spearman rank correlation test, and one-sample t-test to assess accuracy and precision. Statistical significance was set at P < .05 for all tests. Results Both the individual measurements and the average of the measurements were statistically accurate (significant) for the bottom of the superior mesenteric artery and the top and bottom of both the right and left renal arteries. There was variability and inaccuracy in all visceral vessel angles and in the bottom of the celiac artery (the top and the angle of the celiac artery were the arbitrary referents). Conclusions Whereas the visceral vessel orifices are largely accurately assessed and measured, the vessel angles are not. This may lead to an eclipsing phenomenon, which may contribute to branch or fenestrated vessel failure and therefore reintervention. Further efforts should assess the clinical significance of the eclipsing phenomenon and should target accurate and appropriate fenestration construction to prevent long-term morbidity.

AB - Background With the increasing application of fenestrated and physician-modified endografting for aneurysm repair, there is increasing concern about the accuracy of vessel position measurements based on computed tomography scans. Inaccuracies in measurements may result in a “window-shutter” or “eclipsing” phenomenon whereby the fenestration may not overlie the vessel ostium completely. We hypothesized that vessel position measurements from reconstructed imaging do not represent the true vessel position as obtained from a three-dimensional (3D) printed physical model of the visceral aortic segment. Methods Medical 3D modeling software was used to develop the 3D reconstructions, which were then exported to the 3D printing software. This allowed 3D models to be physically generated. The distances to the top and bottom and the angle of each of the celiac, superior mesenteric, right renal, and left renal arteries were recorded. These same measurements were obtained by each of the blinded reviewers in addition to the aortic diameter at the midpoint of each of these vessels. Measurements were compared with intraclass correlation coefficient, nonparametric Spearman rank correlation test, and one-sample t-test to assess accuracy and precision. Statistical significance was set at P < .05 for all tests. Results Both the individual measurements and the average of the measurements were statistically accurate (significant) for the bottom of the superior mesenteric artery and the top and bottom of both the right and left renal arteries. There was variability and inaccuracy in all visceral vessel angles and in the bottom of the celiac artery (the top and the angle of the celiac artery were the arbitrary referents). Conclusions Whereas the visceral vessel orifices are largely accurately assessed and measured, the vessel angles are not. This may lead to an eclipsing phenomenon, which may contribute to branch or fenestrated vessel failure and therefore reintervention. Further efforts should assess the clinical significance of the eclipsing phenomenon and should target accurate and appropriate fenestration construction to prevent long-term morbidity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947466165&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947466165&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.09.044

DO - 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.09.044

M3 - Article

C2 - 26607872

AN - SCOPUS:84947466165

VL - 64

SP - 1789

EP - 1796

JO - Journal of Vascular Surgery

JF - Journal of Vascular Surgery

SN - 0741-5214

IS - 6

ER -