Informed Consent Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology: A Survey Study

Katie Propst, David M. O'Sullivan, Amanda Ulrich, Elena Tunitsky-Bitton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The practice of obstetrics and gynecology poses specific ethical challenges for informed consent (IC). Data regarding resident confidence with the IC process are lacking. Our objective was to evaluate obstetrics and gynecology residents’ education, experience, and confidence related to IC. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional survey of obstetrics and gynecology residents. Descriptive analyses were performed using mean and standard deviation or frequency expressed as a percentage. The results were analyzed for statistical significance using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and Student t or Mann-Whitney U tests, as appropriate, for continuous variables; all results yielding p < 0.05 were deemed statistically significant. SETTING: Electronic survey. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-one trainees completed the survey. The majority of participants were female (84.3%) and from an academic training program (65.1%). Two hundred seventy-seven trainees (98.6%) reported that they had obtained IC for operating room procedures; the majority had first done this in the first postgraduate year (PGY) (n = 258, 91.8%). Trainees most commonly obtain IC for resident and general gynecology attending cases. Most trainees primarily learn how to obtain IC via observation of their coresidents and attendings. Nearly 90% of trainees have obtained IC for a procedure for which they were unsure of all the risks. One hundred seventy-three trainees (61.6%) reported that they would like to have more training in IC. Increasing PGY was significantly associated with increasing confidence in obtaining IC for gynecologic, obstetric, and office procedures (all p < 0.01). There were no differences based on PGY in frequency of reviewing who will perform the surgical procedure (p = 0.75), how trainees will be involved in the procedure (p = 0.35), review of alternative treatments (p = 0.91), or in documentation of the IC process (p = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings of this survey study, education related to the IC process is warranted and curriculum development should be the focus of future study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1146-1152
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Surgical Education
Volume76
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

gynecology
obstetrics
Informed Consent
Gynecology
trainee
Obstetrics
Education
education
resident
confidence
statistical significance
curriculum development
Surveys and Questionnaires
documentation
training program
electronics
Operating Rooms
Nonparametric Statistics
Documentation
Curriculum

Keywords

  • communication
  • Communication Skills
  • consent forms
  • gynecologic surgery
  • informed consent
  • Interpersonal
  • medical education
  • Medical Knowledge
  • Patient Care
  • physician-patient relations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Education

Cite this

Informed Consent Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology : A Survey Study. / Propst, Katie; O'Sullivan, David M.; Ulrich, Amanda; Tunitsky-Bitton, Elena.

In: Journal of Surgical Education, Vol. 76, No. 4, 01.07.2019, p. 1146-1152.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Propst, Katie ; O'Sullivan, David M. ; Ulrich, Amanda ; Tunitsky-Bitton, Elena. / Informed Consent Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology : A Survey Study. In: Journal of Surgical Education. 2019 ; Vol. 76, No. 4. pp. 1146-1152.
@article{05b9098cee9842f7b3c27afe5a84af75,
title = "Informed Consent Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology: A Survey Study",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: The practice of obstetrics and gynecology poses specific ethical challenges for informed consent (IC). Data regarding resident confidence with the IC process are lacking. Our objective was to evaluate obstetrics and gynecology residents’ education, experience, and confidence related to IC. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional survey of obstetrics and gynecology residents. Descriptive analyses were performed using mean and standard deviation or frequency expressed as a percentage. The results were analyzed for statistical significance using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and Student t or Mann-Whitney U tests, as appropriate, for continuous variables; all results yielding p < 0.05 were deemed statistically significant. SETTING: Electronic survey. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-one trainees completed the survey. The majority of participants were female (84.3{\%}) and from an academic training program (65.1{\%}). Two hundred seventy-seven trainees (98.6{\%}) reported that they had obtained IC for operating room procedures; the majority had first done this in the first postgraduate year (PGY) (n = 258, 91.8{\%}). Trainees most commonly obtain IC for resident and general gynecology attending cases. Most trainees primarily learn how to obtain IC via observation of their coresidents and attendings. Nearly 90{\%} of trainees have obtained IC for a procedure for which they were unsure of all the risks. One hundred seventy-three trainees (61.6{\%}) reported that they would like to have more training in IC. Increasing PGY was significantly associated with increasing confidence in obtaining IC for gynecologic, obstetric, and office procedures (all p < 0.01). There were no differences based on PGY in frequency of reviewing who will perform the surgical procedure (p = 0.75), how trainees will be involved in the procedure (p = 0.35), review of alternative treatments (p = 0.91), or in documentation of the IC process (p = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings of this survey study, education related to the IC process is warranted and curriculum development should be the focus of future study.",
keywords = "communication, Communication Skills, consent forms, gynecologic surgery, informed consent, Interpersonal, medical education, Medical Knowledge, Patient Care, physician-patient relations",
author = "Katie Propst and O'Sullivan, {David M.} and Amanda Ulrich and Elena Tunitsky-Bitton",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.12.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "76",
pages = "1146--1152",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Education",
issn = "1931-7204",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Informed Consent Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology

T2 - A Survey Study

AU - Propst, Katie

AU - O'Sullivan, David M.

AU - Ulrich, Amanda

AU - Tunitsky-Bitton, Elena

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: The practice of obstetrics and gynecology poses specific ethical challenges for informed consent (IC). Data regarding resident confidence with the IC process are lacking. Our objective was to evaluate obstetrics and gynecology residents’ education, experience, and confidence related to IC. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional survey of obstetrics and gynecology residents. Descriptive analyses were performed using mean and standard deviation or frequency expressed as a percentage. The results were analyzed for statistical significance using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and Student t or Mann-Whitney U tests, as appropriate, for continuous variables; all results yielding p < 0.05 were deemed statistically significant. SETTING: Electronic survey. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-one trainees completed the survey. The majority of participants were female (84.3%) and from an academic training program (65.1%). Two hundred seventy-seven trainees (98.6%) reported that they had obtained IC for operating room procedures; the majority had first done this in the first postgraduate year (PGY) (n = 258, 91.8%). Trainees most commonly obtain IC for resident and general gynecology attending cases. Most trainees primarily learn how to obtain IC via observation of their coresidents and attendings. Nearly 90% of trainees have obtained IC for a procedure for which they were unsure of all the risks. One hundred seventy-three trainees (61.6%) reported that they would like to have more training in IC. Increasing PGY was significantly associated with increasing confidence in obtaining IC for gynecologic, obstetric, and office procedures (all p < 0.01). There were no differences based on PGY in frequency of reviewing who will perform the surgical procedure (p = 0.75), how trainees will be involved in the procedure (p = 0.35), review of alternative treatments (p = 0.91), or in documentation of the IC process (p = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings of this survey study, education related to the IC process is warranted and curriculum development should be the focus of future study.

AB - OBJECTIVE: The practice of obstetrics and gynecology poses specific ethical challenges for informed consent (IC). Data regarding resident confidence with the IC process are lacking. Our objective was to evaluate obstetrics and gynecology residents’ education, experience, and confidence related to IC. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional survey of obstetrics and gynecology residents. Descriptive analyses were performed using mean and standard deviation or frequency expressed as a percentage. The results were analyzed for statistical significance using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and Student t or Mann-Whitney U tests, as appropriate, for continuous variables; all results yielding p < 0.05 were deemed statistically significant. SETTING: Electronic survey. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-one trainees completed the survey. The majority of participants were female (84.3%) and from an academic training program (65.1%). Two hundred seventy-seven trainees (98.6%) reported that they had obtained IC for operating room procedures; the majority had first done this in the first postgraduate year (PGY) (n = 258, 91.8%). Trainees most commonly obtain IC for resident and general gynecology attending cases. Most trainees primarily learn how to obtain IC via observation of their coresidents and attendings. Nearly 90% of trainees have obtained IC for a procedure for which they were unsure of all the risks. One hundred seventy-three trainees (61.6%) reported that they would like to have more training in IC. Increasing PGY was significantly associated with increasing confidence in obtaining IC for gynecologic, obstetric, and office procedures (all p < 0.01). There were no differences based on PGY in frequency of reviewing who will perform the surgical procedure (p = 0.75), how trainees will be involved in the procedure (p = 0.35), review of alternative treatments (p = 0.91), or in documentation of the IC process (p = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings of this survey study, education related to the IC process is warranted and curriculum development should be the focus of future study.

KW - communication

KW - Communication Skills

KW - consent forms

KW - gynecologic surgery

KW - informed consent

KW - Interpersonal

KW - medical education

KW - Medical Knowledge

KW - Patient Care

KW - physician-patient relations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059327759&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059327759&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.12.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.12.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 30611700

AN - SCOPUS:85059327759

VL - 76

SP - 1146

EP - 1152

JO - Journal of Surgical Education

JF - Journal of Surgical Education

SN - 1931-7204

IS - 4

ER -