Indices for continuity of care: A systematic review of the literature

Sandra H. Jee, Michael D. Cabana

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

154 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article systematically reviews published literature on different continuity of care (COC) indices that assess the physician-patient relationship and the applicability of such indices to pediatric and chronic-disease patient populations. Frequency and visit type may vary for pediatric and chronically ill patients versus healthy adult patients. Two investigators independently examined 5,070 candidate articles and identified 246 articles related to COC. Forty-four articles were identified that include 32 different indices used to measure COC. Indices were classified into those that calculated COC primarily based on duration of provider relationship (n = 2), density of visits (n = 17), dispersion of providers (n = 8), sequence of providers (n = 1), or subjective estimates (n = 4). The diversity of COC indices reflect differences in how this measure is conceptualized. No index takes into account the visit type. A unique index that reflects continuity in the physicianpatient relationship for pediatric and chronic disease populations is needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)158-188
Number of pages31
JournalMedical Care Research and Review
Volume63
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Continuity of Patient Care
Chronic Disease
Pediatrics
Physician-Patient Relations
Population
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Chronic disease
  • Continuity of care
  • Index
  • Well child examination

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Indices for continuity of care : A systematic review of the literature. / Jee, Sandra H.; Cabana, Michael D.

In: Medical Care Research and Review, Vol. 63, No. 2, 01.04.2006, p. 158-188.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{1b56d470b2c84711ac0f5b420c428113,
title = "Indices for continuity of care: A systematic review of the literature",
abstract = "This article systematically reviews published literature on different continuity of care (COC) indices that assess the physician-patient relationship and the applicability of such indices to pediatric and chronic-disease patient populations. Frequency and visit type may vary for pediatric and chronically ill patients versus healthy adult patients. Two investigators independently examined 5,070 candidate articles and identified 246 articles related to COC. Forty-four articles were identified that include 32 different indices used to measure COC. Indices were classified into those that calculated COC primarily based on duration of provider relationship (n = 2), density of visits (n = 17), dispersion of providers (n = 8), sequence of providers (n = 1), or subjective estimates (n = 4). The diversity of COC indices reflect differences in how this measure is conceptualized. No index takes into account the visit type. A unique index that reflects continuity in the physicianpatient relationship for pediatric and chronic disease populations is needed.",
keywords = "Chronic disease, Continuity of care, Index, Well child examination",
author = "Jee, {Sandra H.} and Cabana, {Michael D.}",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1077558705285294",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "158--188",
journal = "Medical Care Research and Review",
issn = "1077-5587",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Indices for continuity of care

T2 - A systematic review of the literature

AU - Jee, Sandra H.

AU - Cabana, Michael D.

PY - 2006/4/1

Y1 - 2006/4/1

N2 - This article systematically reviews published literature on different continuity of care (COC) indices that assess the physician-patient relationship and the applicability of such indices to pediatric and chronic-disease patient populations. Frequency and visit type may vary for pediatric and chronically ill patients versus healthy adult patients. Two investigators independently examined 5,070 candidate articles and identified 246 articles related to COC. Forty-four articles were identified that include 32 different indices used to measure COC. Indices were classified into those that calculated COC primarily based on duration of provider relationship (n = 2), density of visits (n = 17), dispersion of providers (n = 8), sequence of providers (n = 1), or subjective estimates (n = 4). The diversity of COC indices reflect differences in how this measure is conceptualized. No index takes into account the visit type. A unique index that reflects continuity in the physicianpatient relationship for pediatric and chronic disease populations is needed.

AB - This article systematically reviews published literature on different continuity of care (COC) indices that assess the physician-patient relationship and the applicability of such indices to pediatric and chronic-disease patient populations. Frequency and visit type may vary for pediatric and chronically ill patients versus healthy adult patients. Two investigators independently examined 5,070 candidate articles and identified 246 articles related to COC. Forty-four articles were identified that include 32 different indices used to measure COC. Indices were classified into those that calculated COC primarily based on duration of provider relationship (n = 2), density of visits (n = 17), dispersion of providers (n = 8), sequence of providers (n = 1), or subjective estimates (n = 4). The diversity of COC indices reflect differences in how this measure is conceptualized. No index takes into account the visit type. A unique index that reflects continuity in the physicianpatient relationship for pediatric and chronic disease populations is needed.

KW - Chronic disease

KW - Continuity of care

KW - Index

KW - Well child examination

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33644752892&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33644752892&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1077558705285294

DO - 10.1177/1077558705285294

M3 - Review article

C2 - 16595410

AN - SCOPUS:33644752892

VL - 63

SP - 158

EP - 188

JO - Medical Care Research and Review

JF - Medical Care Research and Review

SN - 1077-5587

IS - 2

ER -