In-office discussions of migraine

Results from the American migraine communication study

Richard B. Lipton, Steven R. Hahn, Roger K. Cady, Jan Lewis Brandes, Suzanne E. Simons, Philip A. Bain, Meaghan R. Nelson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research indicates that successful migraine assessment and treatment depends on information obtained during patient and healthcare professional (HCP) discussions. However, no studies outline how migraine is actually discussed during clinical encounters. OBJECTIVE: Record naturally occurring HCP-migraineur interactions, analyzing frequency and impairment assessment, and preventive treatment discussions. DESIGN: HCPs seeing high volumes of migraineurs were recruited for a communication study. Patients likely to discuss migraine were recruited immediately before their normally scheduled appointment and, once consented, were audio- and video-recorded without a researcher present. Separate post-visit interviews were conducted with patients and HCPs. All interactions were transcribed. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty patients (83% female; mean age 41.7) were analyzed. Patients were diagnosed with migraine 14 years and experienced 5 per month, on average. APPROACH: Transcripts were analyzed using sociolinguistic techniques such as number and type of questions asked and post-visit alignment on migraine frequency and impairment. American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention Study guidelines were utilized. RESULTS: Ninety-one percent of HCP-initiated, migraine-specific questions were closed-ended/short answer; assessments focused on frequency and did not focus on attention on impairment. Open-ended questions in patient post-visit interviews yielded robust impairment-related information. Post-visit, 55% of HCP-patient pairs were misaligned regarding frequency; 51% on impairment. Of the 20 (33%) patients who were preventive medication candidates, 80% did not receive it and 50% of their visits lacked discussion of prevention. CONCLUSIONS: Sociolinguistic analysis revealed that HCPs often used narrowly focused, closed-ended questions and were often unaware of how migraine affected patients' lives as a result. It is recommended that HCPs assess impairment using open-ended questions in combination with the ask-tell-ask technique.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1145-1151
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume23
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2008

Fingerprint

Migraine Disorders
Communication
Delivery of Health Care
Interviews
Appointments and Schedules
Cross-Sectional Studies
Research Personnel
Guidelines
Therapeutics
Research

Keywords

  • Communication
  • Migraine
  • Prevention
  • Sociolinguistics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

In-office discussions of migraine : Results from the American migraine communication study. / Lipton, Richard B.; Hahn, Steven R.; Cady, Roger K.; Brandes, Jan Lewis; Simons, Suzanne E.; Bain, Philip A.; Nelson, Meaghan R.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 23, No. 8, 08.2008, p. 1145-1151.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lipton, Richard B. ; Hahn, Steven R. ; Cady, Roger K. ; Brandes, Jan Lewis ; Simons, Suzanne E. ; Bain, Philip A. ; Nelson, Meaghan R. / In-office discussions of migraine : Results from the American migraine communication study. In: Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2008 ; Vol. 23, No. 8. pp. 1145-1151.
@article{50d00bbd5df44fbf973b1ea4f89e4b18,
title = "In-office discussions of migraine: Results from the American migraine communication study",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Research indicates that successful migraine assessment and treatment depends on information obtained during patient and healthcare professional (HCP) discussions. However, no studies outline how migraine is actually discussed during clinical encounters. OBJECTIVE: Record naturally occurring HCP-migraineur interactions, analyzing frequency and impairment assessment, and preventive treatment discussions. DESIGN: HCPs seeing high volumes of migraineurs were recruited for a communication study. Patients likely to discuss migraine were recruited immediately before their normally scheduled appointment and, once consented, were audio- and video-recorded without a researcher present. Separate post-visit interviews were conducted with patients and HCPs. All interactions were transcribed. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty patients (83{\%} female; mean age 41.7) were analyzed. Patients were diagnosed with migraine 14 years and experienced 5 per month, on average. APPROACH: Transcripts were analyzed using sociolinguistic techniques such as number and type of questions asked and post-visit alignment on migraine frequency and impairment. American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention Study guidelines were utilized. RESULTS: Ninety-one percent of HCP-initiated, migraine-specific questions were closed-ended/short answer; assessments focused on frequency and did not focus on attention on impairment. Open-ended questions in patient post-visit interviews yielded robust impairment-related information. Post-visit, 55{\%} of HCP-patient pairs were misaligned regarding frequency; 51{\%} on impairment. Of the 20 (33{\%}) patients who were preventive medication candidates, 80{\%} did not receive it and 50{\%} of their visits lacked discussion of prevention. CONCLUSIONS: Sociolinguistic analysis revealed that HCPs often used narrowly focused, closed-ended questions and were often unaware of how migraine affected patients' lives as a result. It is recommended that HCPs assess impairment using open-ended questions in combination with the ask-tell-ask technique.",
keywords = "Communication, Migraine, Prevention, Sociolinguistics",
author = "Lipton, {Richard B.} and Hahn, {Steven R.} and Cady, {Roger K.} and Brandes, {Jan Lewis} and Simons, {Suzanne E.} and Bain, {Philip A.} and Nelson, {Meaghan R.}",
year = "2008",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1007/s11606-008-0591-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "1145--1151",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - In-office discussions of migraine

T2 - Results from the American migraine communication study

AU - Lipton, Richard B.

AU - Hahn, Steven R.

AU - Cady, Roger K.

AU - Brandes, Jan Lewis

AU - Simons, Suzanne E.

AU - Bain, Philip A.

AU - Nelson, Meaghan R.

PY - 2008/8

Y1 - 2008/8

N2 - BACKGROUND: Research indicates that successful migraine assessment and treatment depends on information obtained during patient and healthcare professional (HCP) discussions. However, no studies outline how migraine is actually discussed during clinical encounters. OBJECTIVE: Record naturally occurring HCP-migraineur interactions, analyzing frequency and impairment assessment, and preventive treatment discussions. DESIGN: HCPs seeing high volumes of migraineurs were recruited for a communication study. Patients likely to discuss migraine were recruited immediately before their normally scheduled appointment and, once consented, were audio- and video-recorded without a researcher present. Separate post-visit interviews were conducted with patients and HCPs. All interactions were transcribed. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty patients (83% female; mean age 41.7) were analyzed. Patients were diagnosed with migraine 14 years and experienced 5 per month, on average. APPROACH: Transcripts were analyzed using sociolinguistic techniques such as number and type of questions asked and post-visit alignment on migraine frequency and impairment. American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention Study guidelines were utilized. RESULTS: Ninety-one percent of HCP-initiated, migraine-specific questions were closed-ended/short answer; assessments focused on frequency and did not focus on attention on impairment. Open-ended questions in patient post-visit interviews yielded robust impairment-related information. Post-visit, 55% of HCP-patient pairs were misaligned regarding frequency; 51% on impairment. Of the 20 (33%) patients who were preventive medication candidates, 80% did not receive it and 50% of their visits lacked discussion of prevention. CONCLUSIONS: Sociolinguistic analysis revealed that HCPs often used narrowly focused, closed-ended questions and were often unaware of how migraine affected patients' lives as a result. It is recommended that HCPs assess impairment using open-ended questions in combination with the ask-tell-ask technique.

AB - BACKGROUND: Research indicates that successful migraine assessment and treatment depends on information obtained during patient and healthcare professional (HCP) discussions. However, no studies outline how migraine is actually discussed during clinical encounters. OBJECTIVE: Record naturally occurring HCP-migraineur interactions, analyzing frequency and impairment assessment, and preventive treatment discussions. DESIGN: HCPs seeing high volumes of migraineurs were recruited for a communication study. Patients likely to discuss migraine were recruited immediately before their normally scheduled appointment and, once consented, were audio- and video-recorded without a researcher present. Separate post-visit interviews were conducted with patients and HCPs. All interactions were transcribed. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty patients (83% female; mean age 41.7) were analyzed. Patients were diagnosed with migraine 14 years and experienced 5 per month, on average. APPROACH: Transcripts were analyzed using sociolinguistic techniques such as number and type of questions asked and post-visit alignment on migraine frequency and impairment. American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention Study guidelines were utilized. RESULTS: Ninety-one percent of HCP-initiated, migraine-specific questions were closed-ended/short answer; assessments focused on frequency and did not focus on attention on impairment. Open-ended questions in patient post-visit interviews yielded robust impairment-related information. Post-visit, 55% of HCP-patient pairs were misaligned regarding frequency; 51% on impairment. Of the 20 (33%) patients who were preventive medication candidates, 80% did not receive it and 50% of their visits lacked discussion of prevention. CONCLUSIONS: Sociolinguistic analysis revealed that HCPs often used narrowly focused, closed-ended questions and were often unaware of how migraine affected patients' lives as a result. It is recommended that HCPs assess impairment using open-ended questions in combination with the ask-tell-ask technique.

KW - Communication

KW - Migraine

KW - Prevention

KW - Sociolinguistics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=49649106485&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=49649106485&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11606-008-0591-3

DO - 10.1007/s11606-008-0591-3

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 1145

EP - 1151

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 8

ER -