Improving the timeliness of procedures in a pediatric endoscopy suite

Gitit Tomer, Steven J. Choi, Andrea Montalvo, Sheila Sutton, John F. Thompson, Yolanda Rivas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Pediatric endoscopic procedures are essential in the evaluation and treatment of gastrointestinal diseases in children. Although pediatric endoscopists are greatly interested in increasing efficiency and through-put in pediatric endoscopy units, there is scarcely any literature on this critical process. The goal of this study was to improve the timeliness of pediatric endoscopy procedures at Children's Hospital at Montefiore. METHODS: In June 2010, a pediatric endoscopy quality improvement initiative was formed at Children's Hospital at Montefiore. We identified patient-, equipment-, and physician-related causes for case delays. Pareto charts, cause and effect diagrams, process flow mapping, and statistical process control charts were used for analysis. RESULTS: From June 2010 to December 2012, we were able to significantly decrease the first case endoscopy delay from an average of 17 to 10 minutes (P < .001), second case delay from 39 to 25 minutes (P = .01), third case delay from 61 to 45 minutes (P = .05), and fourth case delay from 79 to 51 minutes (P = .05). Total delay time decreased from 196 to 131 minutes, resulting in a reduction of 65 minutes (P = .02). From June 2010 to August 2011 (preintervention period), an average of 36% of first endoscopy cases started within 5 minutes, 51% within 10 minutes, and 61% within 15 minutes of the scheduled time. From September 2011 to December 2012 (postintervention period), the percentage of cases starting within 5 minutes, 10 minutes, and 15 minutes increased to 47% (P = .07), 61% (P = .04), and 79% (P = .01), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Applying quality improvement methods and tools helped improve pediatric endoscopy timeliness and significantly decreased total delays.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPediatrics
Volume133
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2014

Fingerprint

Endoscopy
Pediatrics
Quality Improvement
Gastrointestinal Diseases
Physicians
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Endoscopist
  • Endoscopy unit
  • Pediatric endoscopy
  • Quality improvement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Improving the timeliness of procedures in a pediatric endoscopy suite. / Tomer, Gitit; Choi, Steven J.; Montalvo, Andrea; Sutton, Sheila; Thompson, John F.; Rivas, Yolanda.

In: Pediatrics, Vol. 133, No. 2, 02.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tomer, Gitit ; Choi, Steven J. ; Montalvo, Andrea ; Sutton, Sheila ; Thompson, John F. ; Rivas, Yolanda. / Improving the timeliness of procedures in a pediatric endoscopy suite. In: Pediatrics. 2014 ; Vol. 133, No. 2.
@article{6c429eb37e4844be953d70da05618080,
title = "Improving the timeliness of procedures in a pediatric endoscopy suite",
abstract = "BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Pediatric endoscopic procedures are essential in the evaluation and treatment of gastrointestinal diseases in children. Although pediatric endoscopists are greatly interested in increasing efficiency and through-put in pediatric endoscopy units, there is scarcely any literature on this critical process. The goal of this study was to improve the timeliness of pediatric endoscopy procedures at Children's Hospital at Montefiore. METHODS: In June 2010, a pediatric endoscopy quality improvement initiative was formed at Children's Hospital at Montefiore. We identified patient-, equipment-, and physician-related causes for case delays. Pareto charts, cause and effect diagrams, process flow mapping, and statistical process control charts were used for analysis. RESULTS: From June 2010 to December 2012, we were able to significantly decrease the first case endoscopy delay from an average of 17 to 10 minutes (P < .001), second case delay from 39 to 25 minutes (P = .01), third case delay from 61 to 45 minutes (P = .05), and fourth case delay from 79 to 51 minutes (P = .05). Total delay time decreased from 196 to 131 minutes, resulting in a reduction of 65 minutes (P = .02). From June 2010 to August 2011 (preintervention period), an average of 36{\%} of first endoscopy cases started within 5 minutes, 51{\%} within 10 minutes, and 61{\%} within 15 minutes of the scheduled time. From September 2011 to December 2012 (postintervention period), the percentage of cases starting within 5 minutes, 10 minutes, and 15 minutes increased to 47{\%} (P = .07), 61{\%} (P = .04), and 79{\%} (P = .01), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Applying quality improvement methods and tools helped improve pediatric endoscopy timeliness and significantly decreased total delays.",
keywords = "Endoscopist, Endoscopy unit, Pediatric endoscopy, Quality improvement",
author = "Gitit Tomer and Choi, {Steven J.} and Andrea Montalvo and Sheila Sutton and Thompson, {John F.} and Yolanda Rivas",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1542/peds.2013-2316",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "133",
journal = "Pediatrics",
issn = "0031-4005",
publisher = "American Academy of Pediatrics",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving the timeliness of procedures in a pediatric endoscopy suite

AU - Tomer, Gitit

AU - Choi, Steven J.

AU - Montalvo, Andrea

AU - Sutton, Sheila

AU - Thompson, John F.

AU - Rivas, Yolanda

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Pediatric endoscopic procedures are essential in the evaluation and treatment of gastrointestinal diseases in children. Although pediatric endoscopists are greatly interested in increasing efficiency and through-put in pediatric endoscopy units, there is scarcely any literature on this critical process. The goal of this study was to improve the timeliness of pediatric endoscopy procedures at Children's Hospital at Montefiore. METHODS: In June 2010, a pediatric endoscopy quality improvement initiative was formed at Children's Hospital at Montefiore. We identified patient-, equipment-, and physician-related causes for case delays. Pareto charts, cause and effect diagrams, process flow mapping, and statistical process control charts were used for analysis. RESULTS: From June 2010 to December 2012, we were able to significantly decrease the first case endoscopy delay from an average of 17 to 10 minutes (P < .001), second case delay from 39 to 25 minutes (P = .01), third case delay from 61 to 45 minutes (P = .05), and fourth case delay from 79 to 51 minutes (P = .05). Total delay time decreased from 196 to 131 minutes, resulting in a reduction of 65 minutes (P = .02). From June 2010 to August 2011 (preintervention period), an average of 36% of first endoscopy cases started within 5 minutes, 51% within 10 minutes, and 61% within 15 minutes of the scheduled time. From September 2011 to December 2012 (postintervention period), the percentage of cases starting within 5 minutes, 10 minutes, and 15 minutes increased to 47% (P = .07), 61% (P = .04), and 79% (P = .01), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Applying quality improvement methods and tools helped improve pediatric endoscopy timeliness and significantly decreased total delays.

AB - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Pediatric endoscopic procedures are essential in the evaluation and treatment of gastrointestinal diseases in children. Although pediatric endoscopists are greatly interested in increasing efficiency and through-put in pediatric endoscopy units, there is scarcely any literature on this critical process. The goal of this study was to improve the timeliness of pediatric endoscopy procedures at Children's Hospital at Montefiore. METHODS: In June 2010, a pediatric endoscopy quality improvement initiative was formed at Children's Hospital at Montefiore. We identified patient-, equipment-, and physician-related causes for case delays. Pareto charts, cause and effect diagrams, process flow mapping, and statistical process control charts were used for analysis. RESULTS: From June 2010 to December 2012, we were able to significantly decrease the first case endoscopy delay from an average of 17 to 10 minutes (P < .001), second case delay from 39 to 25 minutes (P = .01), third case delay from 61 to 45 minutes (P = .05), and fourth case delay from 79 to 51 minutes (P = .05). Total delay time decreased from 196 to 131 minutes, resulting in a reduction of 65 minutes (P = .02). From June 2010 to August 2011 (preintervention period), an average of 36% of first endoscopy cases started within 5 minutes, 51% within 10 minutes, and 61% within 15 minutes of the scheduled time. From September 2011 to December 2012 (postintervention period), the percentage of cases starting within 5 minutes, 10 minutes, and 15 minutes increased to 47% (P = .07), 61% (P = .04), and 79% (P = .01), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Applying quality improvement methods and tools helped improve pediatric endoscopy timeliness and significantly decreased total delays.

KW - Endoscopist

KW - Endoscopy unit

KW - Pediatric endoscopy

KW - Quality improvement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893263104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893263104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1542/peds.2013-2316

DO - 10.1542/peds.2013-2316

M3 - Article

C2 - 24446444

AN - SCOPUS:84893263104

VL - 133

JO - Pediatrics

JF - Pediatrics

SN - 0031-4005

IS - 2

ER -