Improving Interprofessional Consistency in Electronic Fetal Heart Rate Interpretation

Shravya Govindappagari, Sahar Zaghi, Ferdous Zannat, Laura Reimers, Dena Goffman, Irene Kassel, Peter S. Bernstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective To determine if mandatory online training in electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) improved agreement in documentation between obstetric care providers and nurses on labor and delivery. Methods Health care professionals working in obstetrics at our institution were required to complete a course on EFM interpretation. We performed a retrospective chart review of 701 charts including patients delivered before and after the introduction of the course to evaluate agreement among providers in their documentation of their interpretations of the EFM tracings. Results Agreement between provider and nurse documentation at the time of admission improved for variability and accelerations (variability: 91.1 vs. 98.3%, p <0.001; and accelerations: 75.2 vs. 87.7%, p <0.001). Similarly, agreement improved at the time of the last note prior to delivery for documentation of variability and accelerations (variability: 82.1 vs. 90.6%, p = 0.001; and accelerations: 56.7 vs. 68.6%, p = 0.0012). Agreement in interpretation of decelerations both at the time of admission and at the time of delivery increased (86.3 vs. 90.6%, p = 0.0787, and 56.7 vs. 61.1%, p = 0.2314, respectively) but was not significant. Conclusion An online EFM course can significantly improve consistency in multidisciplinary documentation of fetal heart rate tracing interpretation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Perinatology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Dec 28 2015

Fingerprint

Fetal Heart Rate
Cardiotocography
Documentation
Obstetrics
Nurses
Deceleration
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • accelerations
  • consistency
  • decelerations
  • electronic fetal monitoring
  • variability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Improving Interprofessional Consistency in Electronic Fetal Heart Rate Interpretation. / Govindappagari, Shravya; Zaghi, Sahar; Zannat, Ferdous; Reimers, Laura; Goffman, Dena; Kassel, Irene; Bernstein, Peter S.

In: American Journal of Perinatology, 28.12.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Govindappagari, Shravya ; Zaghi, Sahar ; Zannat, Ferdous ; Reimers, Laura ; Goffman, Dena ; Kassel, Irene ; Bernstein, Peter S. / Improving Interprofessional Consistency in Electronic Fetal Heart Rate Interpretation. In: American Journal of Perinatology. 2015.
@article{fd1aae4ed1a343b28cb7eb5cc565134d,
title = "Improving Interprofessional Consistency in Electronic Fetal Heart Rate Interpretation",
abstract = "Objective To determine if mandatory online training in electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) improved agreement in documentation between obstetric care providers and nurses on labor and delivery. Methods Health care professionals working in obstetrics at our institution were required to complete a course on EFM interpretation. We performed a retrospective chart review of 701 charts including patients delivered before and after the introduction of the course to evaluate agreement among providers in their documentation of their interpretations of the EFM tracings. Results Agreement between provider and nurse documentation at the time of admission improved for variability and accelerations (variability: 91.1 vs. 98.3{\%}, p <0.001; and accelerations: 75.2 vs. 87.7{\%}, p <0.001). Similarly, agreement improved at the time of the last note prior to delivery for documentation of variability and accelerations (variability: 82.1 vs. 90.6{\%}, p = 0.001; and accelerations: 56.7 vs. 68.6{\%}, p = 0.0012). Agreement in interpretation of decelerations both at the time of admission and at the time of delivery increased (86.3 vs. 90.6{\%}, p = 0.0787, and 56.7 vs. 61.1{\%}, p = 0.2314, respectively) but was not significant. Conclusion An online EFM course can significantly improve consistency in multidisciplinary documentation of fetal heart rate tracing interpretation.",
keywords = "accelerations, consistency, decelerations, electronic fetal monitoring, variability",
author = "Shravya Govindappagari and Sahar Zaghi and Ferdous Zannat and Laura Reimers and Dena Goffman and Irene Kassel and Bernstein, {Peter S.}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1055/s-0036-1572540",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "American Journal of Perinatology",
issn = "0735-1631",
publisher = "Thieme Medical Publishers",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving Interprofessional Consistency in Electronic Fetal Heart Rate Interpretation

AU - Govindappagari, Shravya

AU - Zaghi, Sahar

AU - Zannat, Ferdous

AU - Reimers, Laura

AU - Goffman, Dena

AU - Kassel, Irene

AU - Bernstein, Peter S.

PY - 2015/12/28

Y1 - 2015/12/28

N2 - Objective To determine if mandatory online training in electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) improved agreement in documentation between obstetric care providers and nurses on labor and delivery. Methods Health care professionals working in obstetrics at our institution were required to complete a course on EFM interpretation. We performed a retrospective chart review of 701 charts including patients delivered before and after the introduction of the course to evaluate agreement among providers in their documentation of their interpretations of the EFM tracings. Results Agreement between provider and nurse documentation at the time of admission improved for variability and accelerations (variability: 91.1 vs. 98.3%, p <0.001; and accelerations: 75.2 vs. 87.7%, p <0.001). Similarly, agreement improved at the time of the last note prior to delivery for documentation of variability and accelerations (variability: 82.1 vs. 90.6%, p = 0.001; and accelerations: 56.7 vs. 68.6%, p = 0.0012). Agreement in interpretation of decelerations both at the time of admission and at the time of delivery increased (86.3 vs. 90.6%, p = 0.0787, and 56.7 vs. 61.1%, p = 0.2314, respectively) but was not significant. Conclusion An online EFM course can significantly improve consistency in multidisciplinary documentation of fetal heart rate tracing interpretation.

AB - Objective To determine if mandatory online training in electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) improved agreement in documentation between obstetric care providers and nurses on labor and delivery. Methods Health care professionals working in obstetrics at our institution were required to complete a course on EFM interpretation. We performed a retrospective chart review of 701 charts including patients delivered before and after the introduction of the course to evaluate agreement among providers in their documentation of their interpretations of the EFM tracings. Results Agreement between provider and nurse documentation at the time of admission improved for variability and accelerations (variability: 91.1 vs. 98.3%, p <0.001; and accelerations: 75.2 vs. 87.7%, p <0.001). Similarly, agreement improved at the time of the last note prior to delivery for documentation of variability and accelerations (variability: 82.1 vs. 90.6%, p = 0.001; and accelerations: 56.7 vs. 68.6%, p = 0.0012). Agreement in interpretation of decelerations both at the time of admission and at the time of delivery increased (86.3 vs. 90.6%, p = 0.0787, and 56.7 vs. 61.1%, p = 0.2314, respectively) but was not significant. Conclusion An online EFM course can significantly improve consistency in multidisciplinary documentation of fetal heart rate tracing interpretation.

KW - accelerations

KW - consistency

KW - decelerations

KW - electronic fetal monitoring

KW - variability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959066583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959066583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-0036-1572540

DO - 10.1055/s-0036-1572540

M3 - Article

JO - American Journal of Perinatology

JF - American Journal of Perinatology

SN - 0735-1631

ER -