TY - JOUR
T1 - Implicit Bias Recognition and Management
T2 - Tailored Instruction for Faculty
AU - Rodriguez, Natalia
AU - Kintzer, Emily
AU - List, Julie
AU - Lypson, Monica
AU - Grochowalski, Joseph H.
AU - Marantz, Paul R.
AU - Gonzalez, Cristina M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: Dr. Gonzalez was supported while conducting this work by the Harold Amos Medical Faculty Development Program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation grant number 70639 and by the Macy Faculty Scholars Program of the Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation, and later NIH/National Institute for Minority Health and Health Disparities K23MD014178. Dr. Marantz was supported in part by NIH/National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) Einstein-Montefiore NIH/NCATS grant numbers KL2TR002558, TL1TR002557 and UL1TR002556, and by AHRQ grant number R25HS023199.
Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Dr. William Southern for contributing animation to selected slides. Funding: Dr. Gonzalez was supported while conducting this work by the Harold Amos Medical Faculty Development Program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation grant number 70639 and by the Macy Faculty Scholars Program of the Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation, and later NIH/National Institute for Minority Health and Health Disparities K23MD014178. Dr. Marantz was supported in part by NIH/National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) Einstein-Montefiore NIH/NCATS grant numbers KL2TR002558, TL1TR002557 and UL1TR002556, and by AHRQ grant number R25HS023199.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 National Medical Association
PY - 2021/10
Y1 - 2021/10
N2 - Background: Implicit bias instruction is becoming more prevalent across the continuum of medical education. Little guidance exists for faculty on recognizing and debriefing about implicit bias during routine clinical encounters. Objective: To assess the impact and feasibility of single seminars on implicit bias and the approach to its management in clinical settings. Methods: Between September 2016 and November 2017, the authors delivered five departmental/divisional grand rounds across three different academic medical centers in New York, USA. Instruction provided background information on implicit bias, highlighted its relevance to clinical care, and discussed proposed interventions. To evaluate the impact of instruction participants completed a twelve-item retrospective pre-intervention/post-intervention survey. Questions related to comfort and confidence in recognizing and managing implicit bias, debriefing with learners, and role-modeling behaviors. Participants identified strategies for recognizing and managing potentially biased events through free text prompts. Authors qualitatively analyzed participants’ identified strategies. Results: We received 116 completed surveys from 203 participants (57% response rate). Participants self-reported confidence and comfort increased for all questions. Qualitative analysis resulted in three themes: looking inward, looking outward, and taking action at individual and institutional levels. Conclusion: After a single session, respondents reported increased confidence and comfort with the topic. They identified strategies relevant to their professional contexts which can inform future skills-based interventions. For healthcare organizations responding to calls for implicit bias training, this approach has great promise. It is feasible and can reach a wide audience through usual grand rounds programming, serving as an effective early step in such training.
AB - Background: Implicit bias instruction is becoming more prevalent across the continuum of medical education. Little guidance exists for faculty on recognizing and debriefing about implicit bias during routine clinical encounters. Objective: To assess the impact and feasibility of single seminars on implicit bias and the approach to its management in clinical settings. Methods: Between September 2016 and November 2017, the authors delivered five departmental/divisional grand rounds across three different academic medical centers in New York, USA. Instruction provided background information on implicit bias, highlighted its relevance to clinical care, and discussed proposed interventions. To evaluate the impact of instruction participants completed a twelve-item retrospective pre-intervention/post-intervention survey. Questions related to comfort and confidence in recognizing and managing implicit bias, debriefing with learners, and role-modeling behaviors. Participants identified strategies for recognizing and managing potentially biased events through free text prompts. Authors qualitatively analyzed participants’ identified strategies. Results: We received 116 completed surveys from 203 participants (57% response rate). Participants self-reported confidence and comfort increased for all questions. Qualitative analysis resulted in three themes: looking inward, looking outward, and taking action at individual and institutional levels. Conclusion: After a single session, respondents reported increased confidence and comfort with the topic. They identified strategies relevant to their professional contexts which can inform future skills-based interventions. For healthcare organizations responding to calls for implicit bias training, this approach has great promise. It is feasible and can reach a wide audience through usual grand rounds programming, serving as an effective early step in such training.
KW - Faculty development
KW - Health disparities
KW - Implicit bias
KW - Medical education
KW - Unconscious bias
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107971417&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85107971417&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jnma.2021.05.003
DO - 10.1016/j.jnma.2021.05.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 34140145
AN - SCOPUS:85107971417
SN - 1943-4693
VL - 113
SP - 566
EP - 575
JO - Journal of the National Medical Association
JF - Journal of the National Medical Association
IS - 5
ER -