Implementing panel management for hypertension in a low-income, urban, primary care setting

Elizabeth J. Chuang, Valli Ganti, Afshan Alvi, Harathi Yandrapu, Mehul Dalal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Panel management is a system of care that targets groups of patients with similar needs to improve their quality of care. The purpose of this pilot was to determine whether panel management could improve blood pressure control in patients with previously uncontrolled hypertension and to explore how panel management can be integrated in an urban, low-income, primary care setting. Methods: The practice coach model was used to assist a clinical site in forming a quality improvement team to implement panel management. The team created a patient registry to track hypertensive patients over time and to recall patients with uncontrolled hypertension for planned care visits during which evidence-based interventions for hypertension were delivered. Percent of patients gaining control of blood pressure and change in blood pressure were measured between 6 and 9 months after enrollment. Qualitative interviews of clinic staff were completed to explore strengths and weaknesses of program implementation. Results: Forty patients with uncontrolled hypertension were enrolled in the pilot, and 27.5% gained blood pressure control by 9 months after enrollment (P <.001). The average systolic blood pressure decreased by 16 mm Hg from 156.5 to 140.5 mm Hg (P <.001), and the average diastolic blood pressure decreased by 3.8 mm Hg from 85 to 81.2 mm Hg (P =.03). Staff interviews were generally positive; however, several areas for improvement were identified. Conclusion: Panel management for hypertension can be effective and can be implemented in a low-income, urban, primary care clinic setting given appropriate staffing allocation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)61-66
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of primary care & community health
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
Blood Pressure
Hypertension
Interviews
Quality of Health Care
Quality Improvement
Registries

Keywords

  • Hypertension
  • Panel management
  • Practice coach
  • Primary care
  • Quality improvement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Community and Home Care
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Implementing panel management for hypertension in a low-income, urban, primary care setting. / Chuang, Elizabeth J.; Ganti, Valli; Alvi, Afshan; Yandrapu, Harathi; Dalal, Mehul.

In: Journal of primary care & community health, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2014, p. 61-66.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chuang, Elizabeth J. ; Ganti, Valli ; Alvi, Afshan ; Yandrapu, Harathi ; Dalal, Mehul. / Implementing panel management for hypertension in a low-income, urban, primary care setting. In: Journal of primary care & community health. 2014 ; Vol. 5, No. 1. pp. 61-66.
@article{8e1c46bb55e6405caa4f00af4d4eb2f5,
title = "Implementing panel management for hypertension in a low-income, urban, primary care setting",
abstract = "Objective: Panel management is a system of care that targets groups of patients with similar needs to improve their quality of care. The purpose of this pilot was to determine whether panel management could improve blood pressure control in patients with previously uncontrolled hypertension and to explore how panel management can be integrated in an urban, low-income, primary care setting. Methods: The practice coach model was used to assist a clinical site in forming a quality improvement team to implement panel management. The team created a patient registry to track hypertensive patients over time and to recall patients with uncontrolled hypertension for planned care visits during which evidence-based interventions for hypertension were delivered. Percent of patients gaining control of blood pressure and change in blood pressure were measured between 6 and 9 months after enrollment. Qualitative interviews of clinic staff were completed to explore strengths and weaknesses of program implementation. Results: Forty patients with uncontrolled hypertension were enrolled in the pilot, and 27.5{\%} gained blood pressure control by 9 months after enrollment (P <.001). The average systolic blood pressure decreased by 16 mm Hg from 156.5 to 140.5 mm Hg (P <.001), and the average diastolic blood pressure decreased by 3.8 mm Hg from 85 to 81.2 mm Hg (P =.03). Staff interviews were generally positive; however, several areas for improvement were identified. Conclusion: Panel management for hypertension can be effective and can be implemented in a low-income, urban, primary care clinic setting given appropriate staffing allocation.",
keywords = "Hypertension, Panel management, Practice coach, Primary care, Quality improvement",
author = "Chuang, {Elizabeth J.} and Valli Ganti and Afshan Alvi and Harathi Yandrapu and Mehul Dalal",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1177/2150131913516497",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "61--66",
journal = "Journal of primary care & community health",
issn = "2150-1319",
publisher = "Sage Periodicals Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementing panel management for hypertension in a low-income, urban, primary care setting

AU - Chuang, Elizabeth J.

AU - Ganti, Valli

AU - Alvi, Afshan

AU - Yandrapu, Harathi

AU - Dalal, Mehul

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objective: Panel management is a system of care that targets groups of patients with similar needs to improve their quality of care. The purpose of this pilot was to determine whether panel management could improve blood pressure control in patients with previously uncontrolled hypertension and to explore how panel management can be integrated in an urban, low-income, primary care setting. Methods: The practice coach model was used to assist a clinical site in forming a quality improvement team to implement panel management. The team created a patient registry to track hypertensive patients over time and to recall patients with uncontrolled hypertension for planned care visits during which evidence-based interventions for hypertension were delivered. Percent of patients gaining control of blood pressure and change in blood pressure were measured between 6 and 9 months after enrollment. Qualitative interviews of clinic staff were completed to explore strengths and weaknesses of program implementation. Results: Forty patients with uncontrolled hypertension were enrolled in the pilot, and 27.5% gained blood pressure control by 9 months after enrollment (P <.001). The average systolic blood pressure decreased by 16 mm Hg from 156.5 to 140.5 mm Hg (P <.001), and the average diastolic blood pressure decreased by 3.8 mm Hg from 85 to 81.2 mm Hg (P =.03). Staff interviews were generally positive; however, several areas for improvement were identified. Conclusion: Panel management for hypertension can be effective and can be implemented in a low-income, urban, primary care clinic setting given appropriate staffing allocation.

AB - Objective: Panel management is a system of care that targets groups of patients with similar needs to improve their quality of care. The purpose of this pilot was to determine whether panel management could improve blood pressure control in patients with previously uncontrolled hypertension and to explore how panel management can be integrated in an urban, low-income, primary care setting. Methods: The practice coach model was used to assist a clinical site in forming a quality improvement team to implement panel management. The team created a patient registry to track hypertensive patients over time and to recall patients with uncontrolled hypertension for planned care visits during which evidence-based interventions for hypertension were delivered. Percent of patients gaining control of blood pressure and change in blood pressure were measured between 6 and 9 months after enrollment. Qualitative interviews of clinic staff were completed to explore strengths and weaknesses of program implementation. Results: Forty patients with uncontrolled hypertension were enrolled in the pilot, and 27.5% gained blood pressure control by 9 months after enrollment (P <.001). The average systolic blood pressure decreased by 16 mm Hg from 156.5 to 140.5 mm Hg (P <.001), and the average diastolic blood pressure decreased by 3.8 mm Hg from 85 to 81.2 mm Hg (P =.03). Staff interviews were generally positive; however, several areas for improvement were identified. Conclusion: Panel management for hypertension can be effective and can be implemented in a low-income, urban, primary care clinic setting given appropriate staffing allocation.

KW - Hypertension

KW - Panel management

KW - Practice coach

KW - Primary care

KW - Quality improvement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907236057&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907236057&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2150131913516497

DO - 10.1177/2150131913516497

M3 - Article

C2 - 24356533

AN - SCOPUS:84907236057

VL - 5

SP - 61

EP - 66

JO - Journal of primary care & community health

JF - Journal of primary care & community health

SN - 2150-1319

IS - 1

ER -