Implementing a Structured Reporting Initiative Using a Collaborative Multistep Approach

Shlomit A. Goldberg-Stein, William R. Walter, E. Stephen Amis, Meir H. Scheinfeld

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the successful implementation of a structured reporting initiative in a large urban academic radiology department. Methods: We describe our process, compromises, and top 10 lessons learned in overhauling traditional reporting practices and comprehensively implementing structured reporting at our institution. To achieve our goals, we took deliberate steps toward consensus building, undertook multistep template refinement, and achieved close collaboration with the technical staff, department coders, and hospital information technologists. Following institutional review board exemption, we audited radiologist compliance by evaluating 100 consecutive cases of 12 common examination types. Fisher exact test was applied to determine significance of association between trainee initial report drafting and template compliance. Results: We produced and implemented structured reporting templates for 95% of all departmental computed tomography, magnetic resonance, and ultrasound examinations. Structured templates include specialized reports adhering to the American College of Radiology's Reporting and Data Systems (ACR's RADS) recommendations (eg, Lung-RADS and Li-RADS). We attained 94% radiologist compliance within 2 years, without any financial incentives. Conclusions: We provide a blueprint of how to successfully achieve structured reporting using a collaborative multistep approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalCurrent Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2016

Fingerprint

Compliance
Radiology
Research Ethics Committees
Hospital Departments
Information Systems
Motivation
Consensus
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Tomography
Lung
Radiologists

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

@article{987180c79a454ae7ace5b572d63fcc34,
title = "Implementing a Structured Reporting Initiative Using a Collaborative Multistep Approach",
abstract = "Purpose: To describe the successful implementation of a structured reporting initiative in a large urban academic radiology department. Methods: We describe our process, compromises, and top 10 lessons learned in overhauling traditional reporting practices and comprehensively implementing structured reporting at our institution. To achieve our goals, we took deliberate steps toward consensus building, undertook multistep template refinement, and achieved close collaboration with the technical staff, department coders, and hospital information technologists. Following institutional review board exemption, we audited radiologist compliance by evaluating 100 consecutive cases of 12 common examination types. Fisher exact test was applied to determine significance of association between trainee initial report drafting and template compliance. Results: We produced and implemented structured reporting templates for 95{\%} of all departmental computed tomography, magnetic resonance, and ultrasound examinations. Structured templates include specialized reports adhering to the American College of Radiology's Reporting and Data Systems (ACR's RADS) recommendations (eg, Lung-RADS and Li-RADS). We attained 94{\%} radiologist compliance within 2 years, without any financial incentives. Conclusions: We provide a blueprint of how to successfully achieve structured reporting using a collaborative multistep approach.",
author = "Goldberg-Stein, {Shlomit A.} and Walter, {William R.} and Amis, {E. Stephen} and Scheinfeld, {Meir H.}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1067/j.cpradiol.2016.12.004",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology",
issn = "0363-0188",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementing a Structured Reporting Initiative Using a Collaborative Multistep Approach

AU - Goldberg-Stein, Shlomit A.

AU - Walter, William R.

AU - Amis, E. Stephen

AU - Scheinfeld, Meir H.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Purpose: To describe the successful implementation of a structured reporting initiative in a large urban academic radiology department. Methods: We describe our process, compromises, and top 10 lessons learned in overhauling traditional reporting practices and comprehensively implementing structured reporting at our institution. To achieve our goals, we took deliberate steps toward consensus building, undertook multistep template refinement, and achieved close collaboration with the technical staff, department coders, and hospital information technologists. Following institutional review board exemption, we audited radiologist compliance by evaluating 100 consecutive cases of 12 common examination types. Fisher exact test was applied to determine significance of association between trainee initial report drafting and template compliance. Results: We produced and implemented structured reporting templates for 95% of all departmental computed tomography, magnetic resonance, and ultrasound examinations. Structured templates include specialized reports adhering to the American College of Radiology's Reporting and Data Systems (ACR's RADS) recommendations (eg, Lung-RADS and Li-RADS). We attained 94% radiologist compliance within 2 years, without any financial incentives. Conclusions: We provide a blueprint of how to successfully achieve structured reporting using a collaborative multistep approach.

AB - Purpose: To describe the successful implementation of a structured reporting initiative in a large urban academic radiology department. Methods: We describe our process, compromises, and top 10 lessons learned in overhauling traditional reporting practices and comprehensively implementing structured reporting at our institution. To achieve our goals, we took deliberate steps toward consensus building, undertook multistep template refinement, and achieved close collaboration with the technical staff, department coders, and hospital information technologists. Following institutional review board exemption, we audited radiologist compliance by evaluating 100 consecutive cases of 12 common examination types. Fisher exact test was applied to determine significance of association between trainee initial report drafting and template compliance. Results: We produced and implemented structured reporting templates for 95% of all departmental computed tomography, magnetic resonance, and ultrasound examinations. Structured templates include specialized reports adhering to the American College of Radiology's Reporting and Data Systems (ACR's RADS) recommendations (eg, Lung-RADS and Li-RADS). We attained 94% radiologist compliance within 2 years, without any financial incentives. Conclusions: We provide a blueprint of how to successfully achieve structured reporting using a collaborative multistep approach.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009343286&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009343286&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2016.12.004

DO - 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2016.12.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 28104315

AN - SCOPUS:85009343286

JO - Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology

JF - Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology

SN - 0363-0188

ER -