Implementation of a vision-screening program in rural northeastern United States

Edmund Tsui, Andrew N. Siedlecki, Jie Deng, Margaret C. Pollard, Sandolsam Cha, Susan M. Pepin, Erin M. Salcone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Rural populations comprise almost 20% of the US population and face unique barriers in receiving health care. We describe the implementation of a medical student-run free vision-screening clinic as a strategy to overcome barriers in accessing eye care in New Hampshire and Vermont. Methods: Medical students were trained by an ophthalmologist to administer screening eye examinations. Patients from New Hampshire and Vermont were enrolled through a free community clinic. Screening included a questionnaire, distance and near visual acuity, extraocular movements, confrontational visual fields, and Amsler grid. Patients who met predetermined screening criteria were referred to an ophthalmologist or optometrist for further evaluation. Data including patient demographics, appointment attendance, level of education, and diagnoses were recorded and analyzed. Results: Of 103 patients (mean age of 45.5±12.3 years, 63% female), 74/103 (72%) were referred for further evaluation, and 66/74 (89%) attended their referral appointments. Abnormal ophthalmologic examination findings were observed in 58/66 (88%) patients who attended their referral appointment. Uncorrected refractive error was the most common primary diagnosis in 38% of referred patients. Other diagnoses included glaucoma suspect (21%), retinal diseases (8%), amblyopia (8%), cataract (6%), others (6%), and normal examination (12%). Of the 8/74 (11%) referred patients who did not attend their appointments, reasons included patient cancellation of appointment, work conflicts, or forgetfulness. Patients traveled a mean distance of 16.6 miles (range: 0–50 miles) to attend screening examinations. Mean time for patients’ last effort to seek eye care was 7.1 years (range: 1–54 years). Conclusion: This study underscores the high prevalence of unmet eye care needs in a rural population. Furthermore, it demonstrates that using community health centers as a patient base for screening can yield a high referral attendance rate for this at-risk population and facilitate entrance into the eye care system in a rural setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1883-1887
Number of pages5
JournalClinical Ophthalmology
Volume9
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 7 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Vision Screening
New England
Appointments and Schedules
Referral and Consultation
Rural Population
Medical Students
Community Health Centers
Retinal Diseases
Ocular Hypertension
Amblyopia
Refractive Errors
Visual Fields
Cataract
Visual Acuity
Demography

Keywords

  • Rural health
  • Uninsured
  • Vision screening

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Tsui, E., Siedlecki, A. N., Deng, J., Pollard, M. C., Cha, S., Pepin, S. M., & Salcone, E. M. (2015). Implementation of a vision-screening program in rural northeastern United States. Clinical Ophthalmology, 9, 1883-1887. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S90321

Implementation of a vision-screening program in rural northeastern United States. / Tsui, Edmund; Siedlecki, Andrew N.; Deng, Jie; Pollard, Margaret C.; Cha, Sandolsam; Pepin, Susan M.; Salcone, Erin M.

In: Clinical Ophthalmology, Vol. 9, 07.10.2015, p. 1883-1887.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tsui, E, Siedlecki, AN, Deng, J, Pollard, MC, Cha, S, Pepin, SM & Salcone, EM 2015, 'Implementation of a vision-screening program in rural northeastern United States', Clinical Ophthalmology, vol. 9, pp. 1883-1887. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S90321
Tsui, Edmund ; Siedlecki, Andrew N. ; Deng, Jie ; Pollard, Margaret C. ; Cha, Sandolsam ; Pepin, Susan M. ; Salcone, Erin M. / Implementation of a vision-screening program in rural northeastern United States. In: Clinical Ophthalmology. 2015 ; Vol. 9. pp. 1883-1887.
@article{39547de985ce41f39a0e7bcd7ea92f2a,
title = "Implementation of a vision-screening program in rural northeastern United States",
abstract = "Background: Rural populations comprise almost 20{\%} of the US population and face unique barriers in receiving health care. We describe the implementation of a medical student-run free vision-screening clinic as a strategy to overcome barriers in accessing eye care in New Hampshire and Vermont. Methods: Medical students were trained by an ophthalmologist to administer screening eye examinations. Patients from New Hampshire and Vermont were enrolled through a free community clinic. Screening included a questionnaire, distance and near visual acuity, extraocular movements, confrontational visual fields, and Amsler grid. Patients who met predetermined screening criteria were referred to an ophthalmologist or optometrist for further evaluation. Data including patient demographics, appointment attendance, level of education, and diagnoses were recorded and analyzed. Results: Of 103 patients (mean age of 45.5±12.3 years, 63{\%} female), 74/103 (72{\%}) were referred for further evaluation, and 66/74 (89{\%}) attended their referral appointments. Abnormal ophthalmologic examination findings were observed in 58/66 (88{\%}) patients who attended their referral appointment. Uncorrected refractive error was the most common primary diagnosis in 38{\%} of referred patients. Other diagnoses included glaucoma suspect (21{\%}), retinal diseases (8{\%}), amblyopia (8{\%}), cataract (6{\%}), others (6{\%}), and normal examination (12{\%}). Of the 8/74 (11{\%}) referred patients who did not attend their appointments, reasons included patient cancellation of appointment, work conflicts, or forgetfulness. Patients traveled a mean distance of 16.6 miles (range: 0–50 miles) to attend screening examinations. Mean time for patients’ last effort to seek eye care was 7.1 years (range: 1–54 years). Conclusion: This study underscores the high prevalence of unmet eye care needs in a rural population. Furthermore, it demonstrates that using community health centers as a patient base for screening can yield a high referral attendance rate for this at-risk population and facilitate entrance into the eye care system in a rural setting.",
keywords = "Rural health, Uninsured, Vision screening",
author = "Edmund Tsui and Siedlecki, {Andrew N.} and Jie Deng and Pollard, {Margaret C.} and Sandolsam Cha and Pepin, {Susan M.} and Salcone, {Erin M.}",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "7",
doi = "10.2147/OPTH.S90321",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "1883--1887",
journal = "Clinical Ophthalmology",
issn = "1177-5467",
publisher = "Dove Medical Press Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementation of a vision-screening program in rural northeastern United States

AU - Tsui, Edmund

AU - Siedlecki, Andrew N.

AU - Deng, Jie

AU - Pollard, Margaret C.

AU - Cha, Sandolsam

AU - Pepin, Susan M.

AU - Salcone, Erin M.

PY - 2015/10/7

Y1 - 2015/10/7

N2 - Background: Rural populations comprise almost 20% of the US population and face unique barriers in receiving health care. We describe the implementation of a medical student-run free vision-screening clinic as a strategy to overcome barriers in accessing eye care in New Hampshire and Vermont. Methods: Medical students were trained by an ophthalmologist to administer screening eye examinations. Patients from New Hampshire and Vermont were enrolled through a free community clinic. Screening included a questionnaire, distance and near visual acuity, extraocular movements, confrontational visual fields, and Amsler grid. Patients who met predetermined screening criteria were referred to an ophthalmologist or optometrist for further evaluation. Data including patient demographics, appointment attendance, level of education, and diagnoses were recorded and analyzed. Results: Of 103 patients (mean age of 45.5±12.3 years, 63% female), 74/103 (72%) were referred for further evaluation, and 66/74 (89%) attended their referral appointments. Abnormal ophthalmologic examination findings were observed in 58/66 (88%) patients who attended their referral appointment. Uncorrected refractive error was the most common primary diagnosis in 38% of referred patients. Other diagnoses included glaucoma suspect (21%), retinal diseases (8%), amblyopia (8%), cataract (6%), others (6%), and normal examination (12%). Of the 8/74 (11%) referred patients who did not attend their appointments, reasons included patient cancellation of appointment, work conflicts, or forgetfulness. Patients traveled a mean distance of 16.6 miles (range: 0–50 miles) to attend screening examinations. Mean time for patients’ last effort to seek eye care was 7.1 years (range: 1–54 years). Conclusion: This study underscores the high prevalence of unmet eye care needs in a rural population. Furthermore, it demonstrates that using community health centers as a patient base for screening can yield a high referral attendance rate for this at-risk population and facilitate entrance into the eye care system in a rural setting.

AB - Background: Rural populations comprise almost 20% of the US population and face unique barriers in receiving health care. We describe the implementation of a medical student-run free vision-screening clinic as a strategy to overcome barriers in accessing eye care in New Hampshire and Vermont. Methods: Medical students were trained by an ophthalmologist to administer screening eye examinations. Patients from New Hampshire and Vermont were enrolled through a free community clinic. Screening included a questionnaire, distance and near visual acuity, extraocular movements, confrontational visual fields, and Amsler grid. Patients who met predetermined screening criteria were referred to an ophthalmologist or optometrist for further evaluation. Data including patient demographics, appointment attendance, level of education, and diagnoses were recorded and analyzed. Results: Of 103 patients (mean age of 45.5±12.3 years, 63% female), 74/103 (72%) were referred for further evaluation, and 66/74 (89%) attended their referral appointments. Abnormal ophthalmologic examination findings were observed in 58/66 (88%) patients who attended their referral appointment. Uncorrected refractive error was the most common primary diagnosis in 38% of referred patients. Other diagnoses included glaucoma suspect (21%), retinal diseases (8%), amblyopia (8%), cataract (6%), others (6%), and normal examination (12%). Of the 8/74 (11%) referred patients who did not attend their appointments, reasons included patient cancellation of appointment, work conflicts, or forgetfulness. Patients traveled a mean distance of 16.6 miles (range: 0–50 miles) to attend screening examinations. Mean time for patients’ last effort to seek eye care was 7.1 years (range: 1–54 years). Conclusion: This study underscores the high prevalence of unmet eye care needs in a rural population. Furthermore, it demonstrates that using community health centers as a patient base for screening can yield a high referral attendance rate for this at-risk population and facilitate entrance into the eye care system in a rural setting.

KW - Rural health

KW - Uninsured

KW - Vision screening

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944097716&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84944097716&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2147/OPTH.S90321

DO - 10.2147/OPTH.S90321

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84944097716

VL - 9

SP - 1883

EP - 1887

JO - Clinical Ophthalmology

JF - Clinical Ophthalmology

SN - 1177-5467

ER -