Impact of socioeconomic status on ionizing radiation exposure from medical imaging in children

Katherine Freeman, Daniel Strauchler, Todd S. Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To characterize cumulative radiation exposure from diagnostic imaging (CEDI) in pediatric patients and to investigate its relationship to patients' socioeconomic status and comorbid medical conditions. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of >19,000 pediatric patients seen within the outpatient clinic system of an academic tertiary care urban medical center during the month of January 2006 was conducted to estimate CEDI from all procedures performed within 3 years of the index visit (until January 2009). Socioeconomic status was estimated from census tract geocoding. Comorbid medical conditions were identified from the electronic medical record. Results: A total of 19,063 patients underwent imaging tests within the index month. The mean age was 8.9 ± 6.3 years. Most had private insurance (56%), with 36% receiving Medicaid and 8% private payers. Our population lived in census tracts in which 27 ± 16% of the population were below the federal poverty level with 62% living in areas in which 20% of residents were living below the poverty level. There were differences in CEDI (P <.0001) by age, insurance type, and percentage poverty in the census tract of residence but not among racial groups (P =.6508). The association between poverty and CEDI was generally explained by the 26 Elixhauser diagnoses, with the exception of rheumatoid arthritis. Conclusion: Patients living in areas of greater poverty were exposed over time to more radiation from diagnostic testing than those living in areas with lower percentages of residents living in poverty. This association was explained almost entirely by the presence of disease burden. No direct association was found between socioeconomic status and CEDI.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)799-807
Number of pages9
JournalJACR Journal of the American College of Radiology
Volume9
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Diagnostic Imaging
Poverty
Ionizing Radiation
Social Class
Censuses
Insurance
Geographic Mapping
Pediatrics
Poverty Areas
Electronic Health Records
Medicaid
Tertiary Healthcare
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Population
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Radiation Exposure
Radiation

Keywords

  • access to health care
  • exposure to patients and personnel
  • pediatrics
  • Radiation dose
  • radiation exposure
  • socioeconomic factor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Impact of socioeconomic status on ionizing radiation exposure from medical imaging in children. / Freeman, Katherine; Strauchler, Daniel; Miller, Todd S.

In: JACR Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 9, No. 11, 2012, p. 799-807.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{48e615d03ec9417e8fb86751c575232d,
title = "Impact of socioeconomic status on ionizing radiation exposure from medical imaging in children",
abstract = "Purpose: To characterize cumulative radiation exposure from diagnostic imaging (CEDI) in pediatric patients and to investigate its relationship to patients' socioeconomic status and comorbid medical conditions. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of >19,000 pediatric patients seen within the outpatient clinic system of an academic tertiary care urban medical center during the month of January 2006 was conducted to estimate CEDI from all procedures performed within 3 years of the index visit (until January 2009). Socioeconomic status was estimated from census tract geocoding. Comorbid medical conditions were identified from the electronic medical record. Results: A total of 19,063 patients underwent imaging tests within the index month. The mean age was 8.9 ± 6.3 years. Most had private insurance (56{\%}), with 36{\%} receiving Medicaid and 8{\%} private payers. Our population lived in census tracts in which 27 ± 16{\%} of the population were below the federal poverty level with 62{\%} living in areas in which 20{\%} of residents were living below the poverty level. There were differences in CEDI (P <.0001) by age, insurance type, and percentage poverty in the census tract of residence but not among racial groups (P =.6508). The association between poverty and CEDI was generally explained by the 26 Elixhauser diagnoses, with the exception of rheumatoid arthritis. Conclusion: Patients living in areas of greater poverty were exposed over time to more radiation from diagnostic testing than those living in areas with lower percentages of residents living in poverty. This association was explained almost entirely by the presence of disease burden. No direct association was found between socioeconomic status and CEDI.",
keywords = "access to health care, exposure to patients and personnel, pediatrics, Radiation dose, radiation exposure, socioeconomic factor",
author = "Katherine Freeman and Daniel Strauchler and Miller, {Todd S.}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacr.2012.06.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "799--807",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Radiology",
issn = "1558-349X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of socioeconomic status on ionizing radiation exposure from medical imaging in children

AU - Freeman, Katherine

AU - Strauchler, Daniel

AU - Miller, Todd S.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Purpose: To characterize cumulative radiation exposure from diagnostic imaging (CEDI) in pediatric patients and to investigate its relationship to patients' socioeconomic status and comorbid medical conditions. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of >19,000 pediatric patients seen within the outpatient clinic system of an academic tertiary care urban medical center during the month of January 2006 was conducted to estimate CEDI from all procedures performed within 3 years of the index visit (until January 2009). Socioeconomic status was estimated from census tract geocoding. Comorbid medical conditions were identified from the electronic medical record. Results: A total of 19,063 patients underwent imaging tests within the index month. The mean age was 8.9 ± 6.3 years. Most had private insurance (56%), with 36% receiving Medicaid and 8% private payers. Our population lived in census tracts in which 27 ± 16% of the population were below the federal poverty level with 62% living in areas in which 20% of residents were living below the poverty level. There were differences in CEDI (P <.0001) by age, insurance type, and percentage poverty in the census tract of residence but not among racial groups (P =.6508). The association between poverty and CEDI was generally explained by the 26 Elixhauser diagnoses, with the exception of rheumatoid arthritis. Conclusion: Patients living in areas of greater poverty were exposed over time to more radiation from diagnostic testing than those living in areas with lower percentages of residents living in poverty. This association was explained almost entirely by the presence of disease burden. No direct association was found between socioeconomic status and CEDI.

AB - Purpose: To characterize cumulative radiation exposure from diagnostic imaging (CEDI) in pediatric patients and to investigate its relationship to patients' socioeconomic status and comorbid medical conditions. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of >19,000 pediatric patients seen within the outpatient clinic system of an academic tertiary care urban medical center during the month of January 2006 was conducted to estimate CEDI from all procedures performed within 3 years of the index visit (until January 2009). Socioeconomic status was estimated from census tract geocoding. Comorbid medical conditions were identified from the electronic medical record. Results: A total of 19,063 patients underwent imaging tests within the index month. The mean age was 8.9 ± 6.3 years. Most had private insurance (56%), with 36% receiving Medicaid and 8% private payers. Our population lived in census tracts in which 27 ± 16% of the population were below the federal poverty level with 62% living in areas in which 20% of residents were living below the poverty level. There were differences in CEDI (P <.0001) by age, insurance type, and percentage poverty in the census tract of residence but not among racial groups (P =.6508). The association between poverty and CEDI was generally explained by the 26 Elixhauser diagnoses, with the exception of rheumatoid arthritis. Conclusion: Patients living in areas of greater poverty were exposed over time to more radiation from diagnostic testing than those living in areas with lower percentages of residents living in poverty. This association was explained almost entirely by the presence of disease burden. No direct association was found between socioeconomic status and CEDI.

KW - access to health care

KW - exposure to patients and personnel

KW - pediatrics

KW - Radiation dose

KW - radiation exposure

KW - socioeconomic factor

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926233624&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926233624&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2012.06.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2012.06.005

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 799

EP - 807

JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology

SN - 1558-349X

IS - 11

ER -