Impact of postprostatectomy prostate-specific antigen nadir on outcomes following salvage radiotherapy

Madhur K. Garg, Samuel Tekyi-Mensah, Sue Bolton, Joaquin Velasco, Edson Pontes, David P. Wood, Arthur T. Porter, Jeffrey D. Forman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

82 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives. To evaluate the relationship between the postprostatectomy prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir and the outcome of patients with salvage radiotherapy. Methods. Seventy-eight patients received definitive external beam radiation for recurrence following radical prostatectomy (RP). The PSA nadir was undetectable in 41 patients (less than 0.05 ng/ml). All patients received salvage radiotherapy (median dose 66 Gy) for a median of 19 months (range 2 to 149) following prostatectomy. The median follow-up time was 25 months (range 1 to 59) from the date of completion of radiation. Results. Among patients having an undetectable or detectable postoperative PSA, 78% and 68% were free of disease, respectively, at the last follow-up. At 3 years, the disease-free survival rate were 65% and 60%, respectively (P = 0.6). Overall, the disease-free survival rate at 3 years was 78% in patients with a PSA level 2 ng/ml or less at the time of radiotherapy compared to 31% with a PSA greater than 2 ng/ml (P <0.0001). Conclusions. Many patients who never achieve an undetectable postprostatectomy PSA level may still be salvaged with therapeutic radiotherapy. The best predictor of a favorable outcome is a low (2 ng/ml or less) PSA level at the time of radiation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)998-1002
Number of pages5
JournalUrology
Volume51
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1 1998
Externally publishedYes

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Garg, M. K., Tekyi-Mensah, S., Bolton, S., Velasco, J., Pontes, E., Wood, D. P., ... Forman, J. D. (1998). Impact of postprostatectomy prostate-specific antigen nadir on outcomes following salvage radiotherapy. Urology, 51(6), 998-1002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00023-5