Impact of improved classification on the association of human papillomavirus with cervical precancer

Philip E. Castle, Mark Schiffman, Cosette M. Wheeler, Nicolas Wentzensen, Patti E. Gravitt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Misclassification of exposure and surrogate endpoints of disease can obscure causal relations. Using data from the Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance/Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study (ALTS, 1997-2001), the authors explored the impact of exposure (human papillomavirus (HPV) detection) and endpoint (histologic cervical precancer) classification on their mutual association. Women referred into this study with an atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance Papanicolaou test with satisfactory results for all 4 HPV tests were included in this analysis (n = 3,215; 92.2%). HPV testing results were related to different definitions of cervical precancer, based on paired, worst 2-year histologic diagnoses, by calculating clinical sensitivity, specificity, and odds ratios. The authors found that HPV test sensitivity increased and specificity decreased with increasing certainty of cervical precancer, with HPV testing having the highest sensitivity (92%-98%) and lowest specificity (46%-54%) for consensus cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN 3). The overall accuracy of each HPV test, as measured by odds ratios, was greatest for consensus CIN-3 diagnoses, from 2- to 4-fold greater than for a less stringent precancer definition of any diagnosis of CIN 2 or more severe. In summary, there was convergence of greater certainty of carcinogenic HPV with greater certainty of a precancerous diagnosis, such that all 4 HPV tests almost always tested positive in women most likely to have cervical precancer. Finding increasingly strong associations when both test and diagnostic misclassification are reduced is a useful sign of "true association" in molecular epidemiology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)155-163
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Epidemiology
Volume171
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Gammapapillomavirus
Odds Ratio
Papanicolaou Test
Sensitivity and Specificity
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
Molecular Epidemiology
Triage
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Biomarkers
Atypical Squamous Cells of the Cervix

Keywords

  • Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
  • Misclassification
  • Papillomavirus infections
  • Uterine cervical neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Impact of improved classification on the association of human papillomavirus with cervical precancer. / Castle, Philip E.; Schiffman, Mark; Wheeler, Cosette M.; Wentzensen, Nicolas; Gravitt, Patti E.

In: American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 171, No. 2, 01.2010, p. 155-163.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Castle, Philip E. ; Schiffman, Mark ; Wheeler, Cosette M. ; Wentzensen, Nicolas ; Gravitt, Patti E. / Impact of improved classification on the association of human papillomavirus with cervical precancer. In: American Journal of Epidemiology. 2010 ; Vol. 171, No. 2. pp. 155-163.
@article{887ddf0d60dd46ce85a1ede9266c5b50,
title = "Impact of improved classification on the association of human papillomavirus with cervical precancer",
abstract = "Misclassification of exposure and surrogate endpoints of disease can obscure causal relations. Using data from the Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance/Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study (ALTS, 1997-2001), the authors explored the impact of exposure (human papillomavirus (HPV) detection) and endpoint (histologic cervical precancer) classification on their mutual association. Women referred into this study with an atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance Papanicolaou test with satisfactory results for all 4 HPV tests were included in this analysis (n = 3,215; 92.2{\%}). HPV testing results were related to different definitions of cervical precancer, based on paired, worst 2-year histologic diagnoses, by calculating clinical sensitivity, specificity, and odds ratios. The authors found that HPV test sensitivity increased and specificity decreased with increasing certainty of cervical precancer, with HPV testing having the highest sensitivity (92{\%}-98{\%}) and lowest specificity (46{\%}-54{\%}) for consensus cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN 3). The overall accuracy of each HPV test, as measured by odds ratios, was greatest for consensus CIN-3 diagnoses, from 2- to 4-fold greater than for a less stringent precancer definition of any diagnosis of CIN 2 or more severe. In summary, there was convergence of greater certainty of carcinogenic HPV with greater certainty of a precancerous diagnosis, such that all 4 HPV tests almost always tested positive in women most likely to have cervical precancer. Finding increasingly strong associations when both test and diagnostic misclassification are reduced is a useful sign of {"}true association{"} in molecular epidemiology.",
keywords = "Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, Misclassification, Papillomavirus infections, Uterine cervical neoplasms",
author = "Castle, {Philip E.} and Mark Schiffman and Wheeler, {Cosette M.} and Nicolas Wentzensen and Gravitt, {Patti E.}",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1093/aje/kwp390",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "171",
pages = "155--163",
journal = "American Journal of Epidemiology",
issn = "0002-9262",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of improved classification on the association of human papillomavirus with cervical precancer

AU - Castle, Philip E.

AU - Schiffman, Mark

AU - Wheeler, Cosette M.

AU - Wentzensen, Nicolas

AU - Gravitt, Patti E.

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - Misclassification of exposure and surrogate endpoints of disease can obscure causal relations. Using data from the Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance/Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study (ALTS, 1997-2001), the authors explored the impact of exposure (human papillomavirus (HPV) detection) and endpoint (histologic cervical precancer) classification on their mutual association. Women referred into this study with an atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance Papanicolaou test with satisfactory results for all 4 HPV tests were included in this analysis (n = 3,215; 92.2%). HPV testing results were related to different definitions of cervical precancer, based on paired, worst 2-year histologic diagnoses, by calculating clinical sensitivity, specificity, and odds ratios. The authors found that HPV test sensitivity increased and specificity decreased with increasing certainty of cervical precancer, with HPV testing having the highest sensitivity (92%-98%) and lowest specificity (46%-54%) for consensus cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN 3). The overall accuracy of each HPV test, as measured by odds ratios, was greatest for consensus CIN-3 diagnoses, from 2- to 4-fold greater than for a less stringent precancer definition of any diagnosis of CIN 2 or more severe. In summary, there was convergence of greater certainty of carcinogenic HPV with greater certainty of a precancerous diagnosis, such that all 4 HPV tests almost always tested positive in women most likely to have cervical precancer. Finding increasingly strong associations when both test and diagnostic misclassification are reduced is a useful sign of "true association" in molecular epidemiology.

AB - Misclassification of exposure and surrogate endpoints of disease can obscure causal relations. Using data from the Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance/Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study (ALTS, 1997-2001), the authors explored the impact of exposure (human papillomavirus (HPV) detection) and endpoint (histologic cervical precancer) classification on their mutual association. Women referred into this study with an atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance Papanicolaou test with satisfactory results for all 4 HPV tests were included in this analysis (n = 3,215; 92.2%). HPV testing results were related to different definitions of cervical precancer, based on paired, worst 2-year histologic diagnoses, by calculating clinical sensitivity, specificity, and odds ratios. The authors found that HPV test sensitivity increased and specificity decreased with increasing certainty of cervical precancer, with HPV testing having the highest sensitivity (92%-98%) and lowest specificity (46%-54%) for consensus cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN 3). The overall accuracy of each HPV test, as measured by odds ratios, was greatest for consensus CIN-3 diagnoses, from 2- to 4-fold greater than for a less stringent precancer definition of any diagnosis of CIN 2 or more severe. In summary, there was convergence of greater certainty of carcinogenic HPV with greater certainty of a precancerous diagnosis, such that all 4 HPV tests almost always tested positive in women most likely to have cervical precancer. Finding increasingly strong associations when both test and diagnostic misclassification are reduced is a useful sign of "true association" in molecular epidemiology.

KW - Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

KW - Misclassification

KW - Papillomavirus infections

KW - Uterine cervical neoplasms

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=73949103707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=73949103707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/aje/kwp390

DO - 10.1093/aje/kwp390

M3 - Article

C2 - 20007673

AN - SCOPUS:73949103707

VL - 171

SP - 155

EP - 163

JO - American Journal of Epidemiology

JF - American Journal of Epidemiology

SN - 0002-9262

IS - 2

ER -