Identifying Barriers to Initiating Minimal Enteral Feedings in Very Low-Birth-Weight Infants

A Mixed Methods Approach

Yogangi Malhotra, Nneka Nzegwu, Jamie Harrington, Richard A. Ehrenkranz, Janet P. Hafler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective This study aims to elicit physician and nursing perceptions about initiation of minimal enteral feedings (MEF) in very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants. Study Design A three-phase, mixed methods study including a quantitative chart review of 37 VLBW infants, followed by 26 qualitative observations of morning rounds, 26 interviews of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) medical team members, tailored interventions based on the identified barriers to MEF, and finally a postintervention chart audit of 50 VLBW infants. Results The main barriers to initiation of MEF were failure to appreciate the differences between the goals of MEF versus nutritive feedings, inconsistent definition of "sick" infant, indomethacin for intraventricular hemorrhage prophylaxis, awaiting mother's own milk, complicated feeding protocols/algorithms for feeding intolerance, and lack of buy-in from nurses/nurse practitioners. The compliance with early initiation of MEF per the feeding guidelines rose from 25 to 92% after our interventions. Conclusion Understanding the complex interplay of provider, system and patient-based factors that interfere with initiation of MEF may enable NICUs to develop consensus guidelines and targeted interventions and to achieve timely initiation of nonnutritive feedings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)47-56
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Perinatology
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 14 2015

Fingerprint

Very Low Birth Weight Infant
Enteral Nutrition
Guidelines
Teaching Rounds
Nurse Practitioners
Neonatal Intensive Care Units
Indomethacin
Consensus
Milk
Nursing
Nurses
Mothers
Interviews
Hemorrhage
Physicians

Keywords

  • enteral nutrition
  • extrauterine growth restriction
  • feeding protocol
  • nonnutritive feedings
  • trophic feedings

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Identifying Barriers to Initiating Minimal Enteral Feedings in Very Low-Birth-Weight Infants : A Mixed Methods Approach. / Malhotra, Yogangi; Nzegwu, Nneka; Harrington, Jamie; Ehrenkranz, Richard A.; Hafler, Janet P.

In: American Journal of Perinatology, Vol. 33, No. 1, 14.07.2015, p. 47-56.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Malhotra, Yogangi ; Nzegwu, Nneka ; Harrington, Jamie ; Ehrenkranz, Richard A. ; Hafler, Janet P. / Identifying Barriers to Initiating Minimal Enteral Feedings in Very Low-Birth-Weight Infants : A Mixed Methods Approach. In: American Journal of Perinatology. 2015 ; Vol. 33, No. 1. pp. 47-56.
@article{3a44bff600b54c03aeecf0d55a94a39a,
title = "Identifying Barriers to Initiating Minimal Enteral Feedings in Very Low-Birth-Weight Infants: A Mixed Methods Approach",
abstract = "Objective This study aims to elicit physician and nursing perceptions about initiation of minimal enteral feedings (MEF) in very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants. Study Design A three-phase, mixed methods study including a quantitative chart review of 37 VLBW infants, followed by 26 qualitative observations of morning rounds, 26 interviews of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) medical team members, tailored interventions based on the identified barriers to MEF, and finally a postintervention chart audit of 50 VLBW infants. Results The main barriers to initiation of MEF were failure to appreciate the differences between the goals of MEF versus nutritive feedings, inconsistent definition of {"}sick{"} infant, indomethacin for intraventricular hemorrhage prophylaxis, awaiting mother's own milk, complicated feeding protocols/algorithms for feeding intolerance, and lack of buy-in from nurses/nurse practitioners. The compliance with early initiation of MEF per the feeding guidelines rose from 25 to 92{\%} after our interventions. Conclusion Understanding the complex interplay of provider, system and patient-based factors that interfere with initiation of MEF may enable NICUs to develop consensus guidelines and targeted interventions and to achieve timely initiation of nonnutritive feedings.",
keywords = "enteral nutrition, extrauterine growth restriction, feeding protocol, nonnutritive feedings, trophic feedings",
author = "Yogangi Malhotra and Nneka Nzegwu and Jamie Harrington and Ehrenkranz, {Richard A.} and Hafler, {Janet P.}",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1055/s-0035-1556756",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "47--56",
journal = "American Journal of Perinatology",
issn = "0735-1631",
publisher = "Thieme Medical Publishers",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying Barriers to Initiating Minimal Enteral Feedings in Very Low-Birth-Weight Infants

T2 - A Mixed Methods Approach

AU - Malhotra, Yogangi

AU - Nzegwu, Nneka

AU - Harrington, Jamie

AU - Ehrenkranz, Richard A.

AU - Hafler, Janet P.

PY - 2015/7/14

Y1 - 2015/7/14

N2 - Objective This study aims to elicit physician and nursing perceptions about initiation of minimal enteral feedings (MEF) in very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants. Study Design A three-phase, mixed methods study including a quantitative chart review of 37 VLBW infants, followed by 26 qualitative observations of morning rounds, 26 interviews of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) medical team members, tailored interventions based on the identified barriers to MEF, and finally a postintervention chart audit of 50 VLBW infants. Results The main barriers to initiation of MEF were failure to appreciate the differences between the goals of MEF versus nutritive feedings, inconsistent definition of "sick" infant, indomethacin for intraventricular hemorrhage prophylaxis, awaiting mother's own milk, complicated feeding protocols/algorithms for feeding intolerance, and lack of buy-in from nurses/nurse practitioners. The compliance with early initiation of MEF per the feeding guidelines rose from 25 to 92% after our interventions. Conclusion Understanding the complex interplay of provider, system and patient-based factors that interfere with initiation of MEF may enable NICUs to develop consensus guidelines and targeted interventions and to achieve timely initiation of nonnutritive feedings.

AB - Objective This study aims to elicit physician and nursing perceptions about initiation of minimal enteral feedings (MEF) in very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants. Study Design A three-phase, mixed methods study including a quantitative chart review of 37 VLBW infants, followed by 26 qualitative observations of morning rounds, 26 interviews of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) medical team members, tailored interventions based on the identified barriers to MEF, and finally a postintervention chart audit of 50 VLBW infants. Results The main barriers to initiation of MEF were failure to appreciate the differences between the goals of MEF versus nutritive feedings, inconsistent definition of "sick" infant, indomethacin for intraventricular hemorrhage prophylaxis, awaiting mother's own milk, complicated feeding protocols/algorithms for feeding intolerance, and lack of buy-in from nurses/nurse practitioners. The compliance with early initiation of MEF per the feeding guidelines rose from 25 to 92% after our interventions. Conclusion Understanding the complex interplay of provider, system and patient-based factors that interfere with initiation of MEF may enable NICUs to develop consensus guidelines and targeted interventions and to achieve timely initiation of nonnutritive feedings.

KW - enteral nutrition

KW - extrauterine growth restriction

KW - feeding protocol

KW - nonnutritive feedings

KW - trophic feedings

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953839257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953839257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-0035-1556756

DO - 10.1055/s-0035-1556756

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 47

EP - 56

JO - American Journal of Perinatology

JF - American Journal of Perinatology

SN - 0735-1631

IS - 1

ER -