How useful is hand-carried bedside echocardiography in critically ill patients?

Gregory M. Goodkin, Daniel M. Spevack, Paul A. Tunick, Itzhak Kronzon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

113 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The study compared a hand-carried echocardiography (HC) device with standard echocardiography (SE) in critically ill patients. BACKGROUND: Recently, small HC devices have been introduced, and early reports showed a good correlation with SE. METHODS: We used HC (SonoSite, Bothell, Washington) echocardiography to evaluate critically ill patients, and we compared the results with SE obtained with state-of-the-art equipment (Sonos 5500, Hewlett-Packard, Andover, Massachusetts). Each of 80 critically ill patients was studied twice (HC and SE). The studies were done and interpreted separately in blinded fashion. RESULTS: The HC device missed a clinical finding related to the reason for referral in 31% of patients. In 19% of patients a clinically important finding separate from the indication for echocardiography was also missed. The total number of patients with one or more missed findings was 36 (45%). Findings were missed by HC for several reasons. First, HC does not contain spectral Doppler, electrocardiographic, or M-mode capabilities. Two-dimensional imaging is superior on SE, with improved image processing. In addition, although HC does contain color power Doppler, it does not have true color flow Doppler imaging. Therefore, HC often failed to detect or accurately quantify valvular regurgitation. CONCLUSIONS: Although the HC device was able to provide important anatomic information, the device falls far short of SE in the evaluation of critically ill patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2019-2022
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume37
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 15 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Critical Illness
Echocardiography
Hand
Equipment and Supplies
Color

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

How useful is hand-carried bedside echocardiography in critically ill patients? / Goodkin, Gregory M.; Spevack, Daniel M.; Tunick, Paul A.; Kronzon, Itzhak.

In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Vol. 37, No. 8, 15.06.2001, p. 2019-2022.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Goodkin, Gregory M. ; Spevack, Daniel M. ; Tunick, Paul A. ; Kronzon, Itzhak. / How useful is hand-carried bedside echocardiography in critically ill patients?. In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2001 ; Vol. 37, No. 8. pp. 2019-2022.
@article{e94c6f1cc59a4b928cf5032c47e07997,
title = "How useful is hand-carried bedside echocardiography in critically ill patients?",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: The study compared a hand-carried echocardiography (HC) device with standard echocardiography (SE) in critically ill patients. BACKGROUND: Recently, small HC devices have been introduced, and early reports showed a good correlation with SE. METHODS: We used HC (SonoSite, Bothell, Washington) echocardiography to evaluate critically ill patients, and we compared the results with SE obtained with state-of-the-art equipment (Sonos 5500, Hewlett-Packard, Andover, Massachusetts). Each of 80 critically ill patients was studied twice (HC and SE). The studies were done and interpreted separately in blinded fashion. RESULTS: The HC device missed a clinical finding related to the reason for referral in 31{\%} of patients. In 19{\%} of patients a clinically important finding separate from the indication for echocardiography was also missed. The total number of patients with one or more missed findings was 36 (45{\%}). Findings were missed by HC for several reasons. First, HC does not contain spectral Doppler, electrocardiographic, or M-mode capabilities. Two-dimensional imaging is superior on SE, with improved image processing. In addition, although HC does contain color power Doppler, it does not have true color flow Doppler imaging. Therefore, HC often failed to detect or accurately quantify valvular regurgitation. CONCLUSIONS: Although the HC device was able to provide important anatomic information, the device falls far short of SE in the evaluation of critically ill patients.",
author = "Goodkin, {Gregory M.} and Spevack, {Daniel M.} and Tunick, {Paul A.} and Itzhak Kronzon",
year = "2001",
month = "6",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01293-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "2019--2022",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Cardiology",
issn = "0735-1097",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How useful is hand-carried bedside echocardiography in critically ill patients?

AU - Goodkin, Gregory M.

AU - Spevack, Daniel M.

AU - Tunick, Paul A.

AU - Kronzon, Itzhak

PY - 2001/6/15

Y1 - 2001/6/15

N2 - OBJECTIVES: The study compared a hand-carried echocardiography (HC) device with standard echocardiography (SE) in critically ill patients. BACKGROUND: Recently, small HC devices have been introduced, and early reports showed a good correlation with SE. METHODS: We used HC (SonoSite, Bothell, Washington) echocardiography to evaluate critically ill patients, and we compared the results with SE obtained with state-of-the-art equipment (Sonos 5500, Hewlett-Packard, Andover, Massachusetts). Each of 80 critically ill patients was studied twice (HC and SE). The studies were done and interpreted separately in blinded fashion. RESULTS: The HC device missed a clinical finding related to the reason for referral in 31% of patients. In 19% of patients a clinically important finding separate from the indication for echocardiography was also missed. The total number of patients with one or more missed findings was 36 (45%). Findings were missed by HC for several reasons. First, HC does not contain spectral Doppler, electrocardiographic, or M-mode capabilities. Two-dimensional imaging is superior on SE, with improved image processing. In addition, although HC does contain color power Doppler, it does not have true color flow Doppler imaging. Therefore, HC often failed to detect or accurately quantify valvular regurgitation. CONCLUSIONS: Although the HC device was able to provide important anatomic information, the device falls far short of SE in the evaluation of critically ill patients.

AB - OBJECTIVES: The study compared a hand-carried echocardiography (HC) device with standard echocardiography (SE) in critically ill patients. BACKGROUND: Recently, small HC devices have been introduced, and early reports showed a good correlation with SE. METHODS: We used HC (SonoSite, Bothell, Washington) echocardiography to evaluate critically ill patients, and we compared the results with SE obtained with state-of-the-art equipment (Sonos 5500, Hewlett-Packard, Andover, Massachusetts). Each of 80 critically ill patients was studied twice (HC and SE). The studies were done and interpreted separately in blinded fashion. RESULTS: The HC device missed a clinical finding related to the reason for referral in 31% of patients. In 19% of patients a clinically important finding separate from the indication for echocardiography was also missed. The total number of patients with one or more missed findings was 36 (45%). Findings were missed by HC for several reasons. First, HC does not contain spectral Doppler, electrocardiographic, or M-mode capabilities. Two-dimensional imaging is superior on SE, with improved image processing. In addition, although HC does contain color power Doppler, it does not have true color flow Doppler imaging. Therefore, HC often failed to detect or accurately quantify valvular regurgitation. CONCLUSIONS: Although the HC device was able to provide important anatomic information, the device falls far short of SE in the evaluation of critically ill patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035875795&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035875795&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01293-1

DO - 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01293-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 11419880

AN - SCOPUS:0035875795

VL - 37

SP - 2019

EP - 2022

JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

SN - 0735-1097

IS - 8

ER -