How Should Social Media Be Used in Transplantation? A Survey of the American Society of Transplant Surgeons

Macey L. Henderson, Joel T. Adler, Sarah E. Van Pilsum Rasmussen, Alvin G. Thomas, Patrick D. Herron, Madeleine M. Waldram, Jessica M. Ruck, Tanjala S. Purnell, Sandra R. DiBrito, Courtenay M. Holscher, Christine E. Haugen, Yewande Alimi, Jonathan M. Konel, Ann K. Eno, Jacqueline M. Garonzik Wang, Elisa J. Gordon, Krista L. Lentine, Randolph L. Schaffer, Andrew M. Cameron, Dorry L. Segev

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Social media platforms are increasingly used in surgery and have shown promise as effective tools to promote deceased donation and expand living donor transplantation. There is a growing need to understand how social media-driven communication is perceived by providers in the field of transplantation. METHODS: We surveyed 299 members of the American Society of Transplant Surgeons about their use of, attitudes toward, and perceptions of social media and analyzed relationships between responses and participant characteristics. RESULTS: Respondents used social media to communicate with: family and friends (76%), surgeons (59%), transplant professionals (57%), transplant recipients (21%), living donors (16%), and waitlisted candidates (15%). Most respondents (83%) reported using social media for at least 1 purpose. Although most (61%) supported sharing information with transplant recipients via social media, 42% believed it should not be used to facilitate living donor-recipient matching. Younger age (P = 0.02) and fewer years of experience in the field of transplantation (P = 0.03) were associated with stronger belief that social media can be influential in living organ donation. Respondents at transplant centers with higher reported use of social media had more favorable views about sharing information with transplant recipients (P < 0.01), increasing awareness about deceased organ donation (P < 0.01), and advertising for transplant centers (P < 0.01). Individual characteristics influence opinions about the role and clinical usefulness of social media. CONCLUSIONS: Transplant center involvement and support for social media may influence clinician perceptions and practices. Increasing use of social media among transplant professionals may provide an opportunity to deliver high-quality information to patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)573-580
Number of pages8
JournalTransplantation
Volume103
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2019

Fingerprint

Social Media
Transplantation
Living Donors
Transplants
Tissue and Organ Procurement
Information Dissemination
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Transplantation

Cite this

Henderson, M. L., Adler, J. T., Van Pilsum Rasmussen, S. E., Thomas, A. G., Herron, P. D., Waldram, M. M., ... Segev, D. L. (2019). How Should Social Media Be Used in Transplantation? A Survey of the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. Transplantation, 103(3), 573-580. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000002243

How Should Social Media Be Used in Transplantation? A Survey of the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. / Henderson, Macey L.; Adler, Joel T.; Van Pilsum Rasmussen, Sarah E.; Thomas, Alvin G.; Herron, Patrick D.; Waldram, Madeleine M.; Ruck, Jessica M.; Purnell, Tanjala S.; DiBrito, Sandra R.; Holscher, Courtenay M.; Haugen, Christine E.; Alimi, Yewande; Konel, Jonathan M.; Eno, Ann K.; Garonzik Wang, Jacqueline M.; Gordon, Elisa J.; Lentine, Krista L.; Schaffer, Randolph L.; Cameron, Andrew M.; Segev, Dorry L.

In: Transplantation, Vol. 103, No. 3, 01.03.2019, p. 573-580.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Henderson, ML, Adler, JT, Van Pilsum Rasmussen, SE, Thomas, AG, Herron, PD, Waldram, MM, Ruck, JM, Purnell, TS, DiBrito, SR, Holscher, CM, Haugen, CE, Alimi, Y, Konel, JM, Eno, AK, Garonzik Wang, JM, Gordon, EJ, Lentine, KL, Schaffer, RL, Cameron, AM & Segev, DL 2019, 'How Should Social Media Be Used in Transplantation? A Survey of the American Society of Transplant Surgeons', Transplantation, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 573-580. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000002243
Henderson, Macey L. ; Adler, Joel T. ; Van Pilsum Rasmussen, Sarah E. ; Thomas, Alvin G. ; Herron, Patrick D. ; Waldram, Madeleine M. ; Ruck, Jessica M. ; Purnell, Tanjala S. ; DiBrito, Sandra R. ; Holscher, Courtenay M. ; Haugen, Christine E. ; Alimi, Yewande ; Konel, Jonathan M. ; Eno, Ann K. ; Garonzik Wang, Jacqueline M. ; Gordon, Elisa J. ; Lentine, Krista L. ; Schaffer, Randolph L. ; Cameron, Andrew M. ; Segev, Dorry L. / How Should Social Media Be Used in Transplantation? A Survey of the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. In: Transplantation. 2019 ; Vol. 103, No. 3. pp. 573-580.
@article{37c32d35cc334dfea89af5e11be72b61,
title = "How Should Social Media Be Used in Transplantation? A Survey of the American Society of Transplant Surgeons",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Social media platforms are increasingly used in surgery and have shown promise as effective tools to promote deceased donation and expand living donor transplantation. There is a growing need to understand how social media-driven communication is perceived by providers in the field of transplantation. METHODS: We surveyed 299 members of the American Society of Transplant Surgeons about their use of, attitudes toward, and perceptions of social media and analyzed relationships between responses and participant characteristics. RESULTS: Respondents used social media to communicate with: family and friends (76{\%}), surgeons (59{\%}), transplant professionals (57{\%}), transplant recipients (21{\%}), living donors (16{\%}), and waitlisted candidates (15{\%}). Most respondents (83{\%}) reported using social media for at least 1 purpose. Although most (61{\%}) supported sharing information with transplant recipients via social media, 42{\%} believed it should not be used to facilitate living donor-recipient matching. Younger age (P = 0.02) and fewer years of experience in the field of transplantation (P = 0.03) were associated with stronger belief that social media can be influential in living organ donation. Respondents at transplant centers with higher reported use of social media had more favorable views about sharing information with transplant recipients (P < 0.01), increasing awareness about deceased organ donation (P < 0.01), and advertising for transplant centers (P < 0.01). Individual characteristics influence opinions about the role and clinical usefulness of social media. CONCLUSIONS: Transplant center involvement and support for social media may influence clinician perceptions and practices. Increasing use of social media among transplant professionals may provide an opportunity to deliver high-quality information to patients.",
author = "Henderson, {Macey L.} and Adler, {Joel T.} and {Van Pilsum Rasmussen}, {Sarah E.} and Thomas, {Alvin G.} and Herron, {Patrick D.} and Waldram, {Madeleine M.} and Ruck, {Jessica M.} and Purnell, {Tanjala S.} and DiBrito, {Sandra R.} and Holscher, {Courtenay M.} and Haugen, {Christine E.} and Yewande Alimi and Konel, {Jonathan M.} and Eno, {Ann K.} and {Garonzik Wang}, {Jacqueline M.} and Gordon, {Elisa J.} and Lentine, {Krista L.} and Schaffer, {Randolph L.} and Cameron, {Andrew M.} and Segev, {Dorry L.}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/TP.0000000000002243",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "103",
pages = "573--580",
journal = "Transplantation",
issn = "0041-1337",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Should Social Media Be Used in Transplantation? A Survey of the American Society of Transplant Surgeons

AU - Henderson, Macey L.

AU - Adler, Joel T.

AU - Van Pilsum Rasmussen, Sarah E.

AU - Thomas, Alvin G.

AU - Herron, Patrick D.

AU - Waldram, Madeleine M.

AU - Ruck, Jessica M.

AU - Purnell, Tanjala S.

AU - DiBrito, Sandra R.

AU - Holscher, Courtenay M.

AU - Haugen, Christine E.

AU - Alimi, Yewande

AU - Konel, Jonathan M.

AU - Eno, Ann K.

AU - Garonzik Wang, Jacqueline M.

AU - Gordon, Elisa J.

AU - Lentine, Krista L.

AU - Schaffer, Randolph L.

AU - Cameron, Andrew M.

AU - Segev, Dorry L.

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Social media platforms are increasingly used in surgery and have shown promise as effective tools to promote deceased donation and expand living donor transplantation. There is a growing need to understand how social media-driven communication is perceived by providers in the field of transplantation. METHODS: We surveyed 299 members of the American Society of Transplant Surgeons about their use of, attitudes toward, and perceptions of social media and analyzed relationships between responses and participant characteristics. RESULTS: Respondents used social media to communicate with: family and friends (76%), surgeons (59%), transplant professionals (57%), transplant recipients (21%), living donors (16%), and waitlisted candidates (15%). Most respondents (83%) reported using social media for at least 1 purpose. Although most (61%) supported sharing information with transplant recipients via social media, 42% believed it should not be used to facilitate living donor-recipient matching. Younger age (P = 0.02) and fewer years of experience in the field of transplantation (P = 0.03) were associated with stronger belief that social media can be influential in living organ donation. Respondents at transplant centers with higher reported use of social media had more favorable views about sharing information with transplant recipients (P < 0.01), increasing awareness about deceased organ donation (P < 0.01), and advertising for transplant centers (P < 0.01). Individual characteristics influence opinions about the role and clinical usefulness of social media. CONCLUSIONS: Transplant center involvement and support for social media may influence clinician perceptions and practices. Increasing use of social media among transplant professionals may provide an opportunity to deliver high-quality information to patients.

AB - BACKGROUND: Social media platforms are increasingly used in surgery and have shown promise as effective tools to promote deceased donation and expand living donor transplantation. There is a growing need to understand how social media-driven communication is perceived by providers in the field of transplantation. METHODS: We surveyed 299 members of the American Society of Transplant Surgeons about their use of, attitudes toward, and perceptions of social media and analyzed relationships between responses and participant characteristics. RESULTS: Respondents used social media to communicate with: family and friends (76%), surgeons (59%), transplant professionals (57%), transplant recipients (21%), living donors (16%), and waitlisted candidates (15%). Most respondents (83%) reported using social media for at least 1 purpose. Although most (61%) supported sharing information with transplant recipients via social media, 42% believed it should not be used to facilitate living donor-recipient matching. Younger age (P = 0.02) and fewer years of experience in the field of transplantation (P = 0.03) were associated with stronger belief that social media can be influential in living organ donation. Respondents at transplant centers with higher reported use of social media had more favorable views about sharing information with transplant recipients (P < 0.01), increasing awareness about deceased organ donation (P < 0.01), and advertising for transplant centers (P < 0.01). Individual characteristics influence opinions about the role and clinical usefulness of social media. CONCLUSIONS: Transplant center involvement and support for social media may influence clinician perceptions and practices. Increasing use of social media among transplant professionals may provide an opportunity to deliver high-quality information to patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062093412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062093412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TP.0000000000002243

DO - 10.1097/TP.0000000000002243

M3 - Article

C2 - 29684002

AN - SCOPUS:85062093412

VL - 103

SP - 573

EP - 580

JO - Transplantation

JF - Transplantation

SN - 0041-1337

IS - 3

ER -