How do minor changes in the definition of blood pressure control affect the reported success of hypertension treatment?

Beverly B. Green, Robert C. Kaplan, Bruce M. Psaty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: In 1999, the first reporting year of the Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set, our organization noted a significant difference in the proportion of patients with controlled blood pressure (BP) when the target was changed from < 140/90 mm Hg to ≤ 140/90 mm Hg. We compared these data with a second larger dataset to determine if these findings were an isolated or common phenomenon and to determine what factors influenced this difference. Study design and methods: Subjects were drug-treated hypertensive patients, Blood pressure measurements were taken from outpatient medical records. Results: The percent of hypertensive patients with controlled BP levels was significantly greater (P≤.001) when the cutoff of ≤140/90 mm Hg was used rather than <140/90 mm Hg. When a single BP measurement was used to estimate control, the percent of patients with controlled hypertension increased 12.7% simply by changing the definition to include the level of systolic BP = 140 mm Hg or diastolic BP = 90. When multiple BP readings were used to estimate control, the difference was much less pronounced (2.7%). Conclusions: When evaluating the success of hypertension treatment, defining BP control as a BP of ≤140 mm Hg systolic and ≤90 diastolic mm Hg will result in significantly more people having controlled BP than when <140 mm Hg systolic and <90 mm Hg diastolie are used. This difference is most likely the result of end-digit preference. The use of multiple measures reduces this effect. Policy makers and guideline authors should consider these aspects when setting BP goals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)219-224
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Managed Care
Volume9
Issue number3
StatePublished - Mar 1 2003

Fingerprint

hypertension
Blood Pressure
Hypertension
employer
Therapeutics
drug
organization
health
Administrative Personnel
Medical Records
Reading
Outpatients
Guidelines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Medicine(all)
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

How do minor changes in the definition of blood pressure control affect the reported success of hypertension treatment? / Green, Beverly B.; Kaplan, Robert C.; Psaty, Bruce M.

In: American Journal of Managed Care, Vol. 9, No. 3, 01.03.2003, p. 219-224.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e1f5ceae7a6045afb913c21206d642df,
title = "How do minor changes in the definition of blood pressure control affect the reported success of hypertension treatment?",
abstract = "Objective: In 1999, the first reporting year of the Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set, our organization noted a significant difference in the proportion of patients with controlled blood pressure (BP) when the target was changed from < 140/90 mm Hg to ≤ 140/90 mm Hg. We compared these data with a second larger dataset to determine if these findings were an isolated or common phenomenon and to determine what factors influenced this difference. Study design and methods: Subjects were drug-treated hypertensive patients, Blood pressure measurements were taken from outpatient medical records. Results: The percent of hypertensive patients with controlled BP levels was significantly greater (P≤.001) when the cutoff of ≤140/90 mm Hg was used rather than <140/90 mm Hg. When a single BP measurement was used to estimate control, the percent of patients with controlled hypertension increased 12.7{\%} simply by changing the definition to include the level of systolic BP = 140 mm Hg or diastolic BP = 90. When multiple BP readings were used to estimate control, the difference was much less pronounced (2.7{\%}). Conclusions: When evaluating the success of hypertension treatment, defining BP control as a BP of ≤140 mm Hg systolic and ≤90 diastolic mm Hg will result in significantly more people having controlled BP than when <140 mm Hg systolic and <90 mm Hg diastolie are used. This difference is most likely the result of end-digit preference. The use of multiple measures reduces this effect. Policy makers and guideline authors should consider these aspects when setting BP goals.",
author = "Green, {Beverly B.} and Kaplan, {Robert C.} and Psaty, {Bruce M.}",
year = "2003",
month = "3",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "219--224",
journal = "American Journal of Managed Care",
issn = "1088-0224",
publisher = "Ascend Media",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How do minor changes in the definition of blood pressure control affect the reported success of hypertension treatment?

AU - Green, Beverly B.

AU - Kaplan, Robert C.

AU - Psaty, Bruce M.

PY - 2003/3/1

Y1 - 2003/3/1

N2 - Objective: In 1999, the first reporting year of the Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set, our organization noted a significant difference in the proportion of patients with controlled blood pressure (BP) when the target was changed from < 140/90 mm Hg to ≤ 140/90 mm Hg. We compared these data with a second larger dataset to determine if these findings were an isolated or common phenomenon and to determine what factors influenced this difference. Study design and methods: Subjects were drug-treated hypertensive patients, Blood pressure measurements were taken from outpatient medical records. Results: The percent of hypertensive patients with controlled BP levels was significantly greater (P≤.001) when the cutoff of ≤140/90 mm Hg was used rather than <140/90 mm Hg. When a single BP measurement was used to estimate control, the percent of patients with controlled hypertension increased 12.7% simply by changing the definition to include the level of systolic BP = 140 mm Hg or diastolic BP = 90. When multiple BP readings were used to estimate control, the difference was much less pronounced (2.7%). Conclusions: When evaluating the success of hypertension treatment, defining BP control as a BP of ≤140 mm Hg systolic and ≤90 diastolic mm Hg will result in significantly more people having controlled BP than when <140 mm Hg systolic and <90 mm Hg diastolie are used. This difference is most likely the result of end-digit preference. The use of multiple measures reduces this effect. Policy makers and guideline authors should consider these aspects when setting BP goals.

AB - Objective: In 1999, the first reporting year of the Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set, our organization noted a significant difference in the proportion of patients with controlled blood pressure (BP) when the target was changed from < 140/90 mm Hg to ≤ 140/90 mm Hg. We compared these data with a second larger dataset to determine if these findings were an isolated or common phenomenon and to determine what factors influenced this difference. Study design and methods: Subjects were drug-treated hypertensive patients, Blood pressure measurements were taken from outpatient medical records. Results: The percent of hypertensive patients with controlled BP levels was significantly greater (P≤.001) when the cutoff of ≤140/90 mm Hg was used rather than <140/90 mm Hg. When a single BP measurement was used to estimate control, the percent of patients with controlled hypertension increased 12.7% simply by changing the definition to include the level of systolic BP = 140 mm Hg or diastolic BP = 90. When multiple BP readings were used to estimate control, the difference was much less pronounced (2.7%). Conclusions: When evaluating the success of hypertension treatment, defining BP control as a BP of ≤140 mm Hg systolic and ≤90 diastolic mm Hg will result in significantly more people having controlled BP than when <140 mm Hg systolic and <90 mm Hg diastolie are used. This difference is most likely the result of end-digit preference. The use of multiple measures reduces this effect. Policy makers and guideline authors should consider these aspects when setting BP goals.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037347561&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037347561&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 219

EP - 224

JO - American Journal of Managed Care

JF - American Journal of Managed Care

SN - 1088-0224

IS - 3

ER -