Heterogeneity in head and neck IMRT target design and clinical practice

Theodore S. Hong, Wolfgang A. Tome, Paul M. Harari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

62 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To assess patterns of H&N IMRT practice with particular emphasis on elective target delineation. Materials and methods: Twenty institutions with established H&N IMRT expertise were solicited to design clinical target volumes for the identical H&N cancer case. To limit contouring variability, a primary tonsil GTV and ipsilateral level II node were pre-contoured. Participants were asked to accept this GTV, and contour their recommended CTV and PTV. Dose prescriptions, contouring time, and recommendations regarding chemotherapy were solicited. Results: All 20 institutions responded. Remarkable heterogeneity in H&N IMRT design and practice was identified. Seventeen of 20 centers recommended treatment of bilateral necks whereas 3/20 recommended treatment of the ipsilateral neck only. The average CTV volume was 250 cm 3 (range 37-676 cm 3). Although there was high concordance in coverage of ipsilateral neck levels II and III, substantial variation was identified for levels I, V, and the contralateral neck. Average CTV expansion was 4.1 mm (range 0-15 mm). Eight of 20 centers recommended chemotherapy (cisplatin), whereas 12/20 recommended radiation alone. Responders prescribed on average 69 and 68 Gy to the tumor and metastatic node GTV, respectively. Average H&N target volume contouring time was 102.5 min (range 60-210 min). Conclusion: This study identifies substantial heterogeneity in H&N IMRT target definition, prescription, neck treatment, and use of chemotherapy among practitioners with established H&N IMRT expertise. These data suggest that continued efforts to standardize and simplify the H&N IMRT process are desirable for the safe and effective global advancement of H&N IMRT practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)92-98
Number of pages7
JournalRadiotherapy and Oncology
Volume103
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Neck
Head
Drug Therapy
Prescriptions
Palatine Tonsil
Cisplatin
Neoplasms
Therapeutics
Radiation

Keywords

  • Contouring
  • CTV definition
  • Head and neck
  • IMRT
  • Target design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Hematology

Cite this

Heterogeneity in head and neck IMRT target design and clinical practice. / Hong, Theodore S.; Tome, Wolfgang A.; Harari, Paul M.

In: Radiotherapy and Oncology, Vol. 103, No. 1, 04.2012, p. 92-98.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hong, Theodore S. ; Tome, Wolfgang A. ; Harari, Paul M. / Heterogeneity in head and neck IMRT target design and clinical practice. In: Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2012 ; Vol. 103, No. 1. pp. 92-98.
@article{527eb70ade204349bf0a14d3337684ab,
title = "Heterogeneity in head and neck IMRT target design and clinical practice",
abstract = "Purpose: To assess patterns of H&N IMRT practice with particular emphasis on elective target delineation. Materials and methods: Twenty institutions with established H&N IMRT expertise were solicited to design clinical target volumes for the identical H&N cancer case. To limit contouring variability, a primary tonsil GTV and ipsilateral level II node were pre-contoured. Participants were asked to accept this GTV, and contour their recommended CTV and PTV. Dose prescriptions, contouring time, and recommendations regarding chemotherapy were solicited. Results: All 20 institutions responded. Remarkable heterogeneity in H&N IMRT design and practice was identified. Seventeen of 20 centers recommended treatment of bilateral necks whereas 3/20 recommended treatment of the ipsilateral neck only. The average CTV volume was 250 cm 3 (range 37-676 cm 3). Although there was high concordance in coverage of ipsilateral neck levels II and III, substantial variation was identified for levels I, V, and the contralateral neck. Average CTV expansion was 4.1 mm (range 0-15 mm). Eight of 20 centers recommended chemotherapy (cisplatin), whereas 12/20 recommended radiation alone. Responders prescribed on average 69 and 68 Gy to the tumor and metastatic node GTV, respectively. Average H&N target volume contouring time was 102.5 min (range 60-210 min). Conclusion: This study identifies substantial heterogeneity in H&N IMRT target definition, prescription, neck treatment, and use of chemotherapy among practitioners with established H&N IMRT expertise. These data suggest that continued efforts to standardize and simplify the H&N IMRT process are desirable for the safe and effective global advancement of H&N IMRT practice.",
keywords = "Contouring, CTV definition, Head and neck, IMRT, Target design",
author = "Hong, {Theodore S.} and Tome, {Wolfgang A.} and Harari, {Paul M.}",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.radonc.2012.02.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "103",
pages = "92--98",
journal = "Radiotherapy and Oncology",
issn = "0167-8140",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Heterogeneity in head and neck IMRT target design and clinical practice

AU - Hong, Theodore S.

AU - Tome, Wolfgang A.

AU - Harari, Paul M.

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - Purpose: To assess patterns of H&N IMRT practice with particular emphasis on elective target delineation. Materials and methods: Twenty institutions with established H&N IMRT expertise were solicited to design clinical target volumes for the identical H&N cancer case. To limit contouring variability, a primary tonsil GTV and ipsilateral level II node were pre-contoured. Participants were asked to accept this GTV, and contour their recommended CTV and PTV. Dose prescriptions, contouring time, and recommendations regarding chemotherapy were solicited. Results: All 20 institutions responded. Remarkable heterogeneity in H&N IMRT design and practice was identified. Seventeen of 20 centers recommended treatment of bilateral necks whereas 3/20 recommended treatment of the ipsilateral neck only. The average CTV volume was 250 cm 3 (range 37-676 cm 3). Although there was high concordance in coverage of ipsilateral neck levels II and III, substantial variation was identified for levels I, V, and the contralateral neck. Average CTV expansion was 4.1 mm (range 0-15 mm). Eight of 20 centers recommended chemotherapy (cisplatin), whereas 12/20 recommended radiation alone. Responders prescribed on average 69 and 68 Gy to the tumor and metastatic node GTV, respectively. Average H&N target volume contouring time was 102.5 min (range 60-210 min). Conclusion: This study identifies substantial heterogeneity in H&N IMRT target definition, prescription, neck treatment, and use of chemotherapy among practitioners with established H&N IMRT expertise. These data suggest that continued efforts to standardize and simplify the H&N IMRT process are desirable for the safe and effective global advancement of H&N IMRT practice.

AB - Purpose: To assess patterns of H&N IMRT practice with particular emphasis on elective target delineation. Materials and methods: Twenty institutions with established H&N IMRT expertise were solicited to design clinical target volumes for the identical H&N cancer case. To limit contouring variability, a primary tonsil GTV and ipsilateral level II node were pre-contoured. Participants were asked to accept this GTV, and contour their recommended CTV and PTV. Dose prescriptions, contouring time, and recommendations regarding chemotherapy were solicited. Results: All 20 institutions responded. Remarkable heterogeneity in H&N IMRT design and practice was identified. Seventeen of 20 centers recommended treatment of bilateral necks whereas 3/20 recommended treatment of the ipsilateral neck only. The average CTV volume was 250 cm 3 (range 37-676 cm 3). Although there was high concordance in coverage of ipsilateral neck levels II and III, substantial variation was identified for levels I, V, and the contralateral neck. Average CTV expansion was 4.1 mm (range 0-15 mm). Eight of 20 centers recommended chemotherapy (cisplatin), whereas 12/20 recommended radiation alone. Responders prescribed on average 69 and 68 Gy to the tumor and metastatic node GTV, respectively. Average H&N target volume contouring time was 102.5 min (range 60-210 min). Conclusion: This study identifies substantial heterogeneity in H&N IMRT target definition, prescription, neck treatment, and use of chemotherapy among practitioners with established H&N IMRT expertise. These data suggest that continued efforts to standardize and simplify the H&N IMRT process are desirable for the safe and effective global advancement of H&N IMRT practice.

KW - Contouring

KW - CTV definition

KW - Head and neck

KW - IMRT

KW - Target design

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859705012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859705012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.02.010

DO - 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.02.010

M3 - Article

C2 - 22405806

AN - SCOPUS:84859705012

VL - 103

SP - 92

EP - 98

JO - Radiotherapy and Oncology

JF - Radiotherapy and Oncology

SN - 0167-8140

IS - 1

ER -