Health services utilization for people with HIV infection: Comparison of a population targeted for outreach with the U.S. population in care

William E. Cunningham, Nancy L. Sohler, Carol Tobias, Mari Lynn Drainoni, Judith Bradford, Cynthia Davis, Howard J. Cabral, Chinazo O. Cunningham, Lois Eldred, Mitchell D. Wong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

77 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many persons with HIV infection do not receive consistent ambulatory medical care and are excluded from studies of patients in medical care. However, these hard-to-reach groups are important to study because they may be in greatest need of services. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the sociodemographic, clinical, and health care utilization characteristics of a multisite sample of HIV-positive persons who were hard to reach with a nationally representative cohort of persons with HIV infection who were receiving care from known HIV providers in the United States and examined whether the independent correlates of low ambulatory utilization differed between the 2 samples. METHODS: We compared sociodemographic, clinical, and health care utilization characteristics in 2 samples of adults with HIV infection: 1286 persons from 16 sites across the United States interviewed in 2001-2002 for the Targeted HIV Outreach and Intervention Initiative (Outreach), a study of underserved persons targeted for supportive outreach services; and 2267 persons from the HIV Costs and Services Utilization Study (HCSUS), a probability sample of persons receiving care who were interviewed in 1998. We conducted logistic regression analyses to identify differences between the 2 samples in sociodemographic and clinical associations with ambulatory medical visits. RESULTS: Compared with the HCSUS sample, the Outreach sample had notably greater proportions of black respondents (59% vs. 32%, P = 0.0001), Hispanics (20% vs. 16%), Spanish-speakers (9% vs. 2%, P = 0.02), those with low socioeconomic status (annual income <$10,000 75% vs. 45%, P = 0.0001), the unemployed, and persons with homelessness, no insurance, and heroin or cocaine use (58% vs. 47%, P = 0.05). They also were more likely to have fewer than 2 ambulatory visits (26% vs. 16%, P = 0.0001), more likely to have emergency room visits or hospitalizations in the prior 6 months, and less likely to be on antiretroviral treatment (82% vs. 58%, P = 0.0001). Nearly all these differences persisted after stratifying for level of ambulatory utilization (fewer than 2 vs. 2 or more in the last 6 months). In multivariate analysis, several variables showed significantly different associations in the 2 samples (interacted) with low ambulatory care utilization. The variables with significant interactions (P values for interaction shown below) had very different adjusted odds ratios (and 95% confidence intervals) for low ambulatory care utilization: age greater than 50 (Outreach 0.55 [0.35-0.88], HCSUS 1.17 [0.65-2.11)], P = 0.05), Hispanic ethnicity (Outreach 0.81 [0.39-1.69], HCSUS 2.34 [1.56-3.52], P = 0.02), low income (Outreach 0.73 [0.56-0.96], HCSUS 1.35 [1.04-1.75], P = 0.002), and heavy alcohol use (Outreach 1.74 [1.23-2.45], HCSUS 1.00 [0.73-1.37], P = 0.02). Having CD4 count less than 50 was associated with elevated odds of low ambulatory medical visits in the Outreach sample (1.53 [1.00-2.36], P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with HCSUS, the Outreach sample had far greater proportions of traditionally vulnerable groups, and were less likely to be in care if they had low CD4 counts. Furthermore, heavy alcohol use was only associated with low ambulatory utilization in Outreach. Generalizing from in care populations may not be warranted, while addressing heavy alcohol use may be effective at improving utilization of care for hard-to-reach HIV-positive populations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1038-1047
Number of pages10
JournalMedical Care
Volume44
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2006

Fingerprint

Health Services
HIV Infections
health service
utilization
HIV
Population
Costs and Cost Analysis
human being
Ambulatory Care
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
costs
Alcohols
CD4 Lymphocyte Count
Hispanic Americans
alcohol
medical care
Homeless Persons
Sampling Studies
Heroin
health care

Keywords

  • Access
  • HIV
  • Outreach
  • Utilization
  • Vulnerable populations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

Cunningham, W. E., Sohler, N. L., Tobias, C., Drainoni, M. L., Bradford, J., Davis, C., ... Wong, M. D. (2006). Health services utilization for people with HIV infection: Comparison of a population targeted for outreach with the U.S. population in care. Medical Care, 44(11), 1038-1047. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000242942.17968.69

Health services utilization for people with HIV infection : Comparison of a population targeted for outreach with the U.S. population in care. / Cunningham, William E.; Sohler, Nancy L.; Tobias, Carol; Drainoni, Mari Lynn; Bradford, Judith; Davis, Cynthia; Cabral, Howard J.; Cunningham, Chinazo O.; Eldred, Lois; Wong, Mitchell D.

In: Medical Care, Vol. 44, No. 11, 11.2006, p. 1038-1047.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cunningham, WE, Sohler, NL, Tobias, C, Drainoni, ML, Bradford, J, Davis, C, Cabral, HJ, Cunningham, CO, Eldred, L & Wong, MD 2006, 'Health services utilization for people with HIV infection: Comparison of a population targeted for outreach with the U.S. population in care', Medical Care, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 1038-1047. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000242942.17968.69
Cunningham, William E. ; Sohler, Nancy L. ; Tobias, Carol ; Drainoni, Mari Lynn ; Bradford, Judith ; Davis, Cynthia ; Cabral, Howard J. ; Cunningham, Chinazo O. ; Eldred, Lois ; Wong, Mitchell D. / Health services utilization for people with HIV infection : Comparison of a population targeted for outreach with the U.S. population in care. In: Medical Care. 2006 ; Vol. 44, No. 11. pp. 1038-1047.
@article{79f00ece652b4d70b628bc1d379e8382,
title = "Health services utilization for people with HIV infection: Comparison of a population targeted for outreach with the U.S. population in care",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Many persons with HIV infection do not receive consistent ambulatory medical care and are excluded from studies of patients in medical care. However, these hard-to-reach groups are important to study because they may be in greatest need of services. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the sociodemographic, clinical, and health care utilization characteristics of a multisite sample of HIV-positive persons who were hard to reach with a nationally representative cohort of persons with HIV infection who were receiving care from known HIV providers in the United States and examined whether the independent correlates of low ambulatory utilization differed between the 2 samples. METHODS: We compared sociodemographic, clinical, and health care utilization characteristics in 2 samples of adults with HIV infection: 1286 persons from 16 sites across the United States interviewed in 2001-2002 for the Targeted HIV Outreach and Intervention Initiative (Outreach), a study of underserved persons targeted for supportive outreach services; and 2267 persons from the HIV Costs and Services Utilization Study (HCSUS), a probability sample of persons receiving care who were interviewed in 1998. We conducted logistic regression analyses to identify differences between the 2 samples in sociodemographic and clinical associations with ambulatory medical visits. RESULTS: Compared with the HCSUS sample, the Outreach sample had notably greater proportions of black respondents (59{\%} vs. 32{\%}, P = 0.0001), Hispanics (20{\%} vs. 16{\%}), Spanish-speakers (9{\%} vs. 2{\%}, P = 0.02), those with low socioeconomic status (annual income <$10,000 75{\%} vs. 45{\%}, P = 0.0001), the unemployed, and persons with homelessness, no insurance, and heroin or cocaine use (58{\%} vs. 47{\%}, P = 0.05). They also were more likely to have fewer than 2 ambulatory visits (26{\%} vs. 16{\%}, P = 0.0001), more likely to have emergency room visits or hospitalizations in the prior 6 months, and less likely to be on antiretroviral treatment (82{\%} vs. 58{\%}, P = 0.0001). Nearly all these differences persisted after stratifying for level of ambulatory utilization (fewer than 2 vs. 2 or more in the last 6 months). In multivariate analysis, several variables showed significantly different associations in the 2 samples (interacted) with low ambulatory care utilization. The variables with significant interactions (P values for interaction shown below) had very different adjusted odds ratios (and 95{\%} confidence intervals) for low ambulatory care utilization: age greater than 50 (Outreach 0.55 [0.35-0.88], HCSUS 1.17 [0.65-2.11)], P = 0.05), Hispanic ethnicity (Outreach 0.81 [0.39-1.69], HCSUS 2.34 [1.56-3.52], P = 0.02), low income (Outreach 0.73 [0.56-0.96], HCSUS 1.35 [1.04-1.75], P = 0.002), and heavy alcohol use (Outreach 1.74 [1.23-2.45], HCSUS 1.00 [0.73-1.37], P = 0.02). Having CD4 count less than 50 was associated with elevated odds of low ambulatory medical visits in the Outreach sample (1.53 [1.00-2.36], P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with HCSUS, the Outreach sample had far greater proportions of traditionally vulnerable groups, and were less likely to be in care if they had low CD4 counts. Furthermore, heavy alcohol use was only associated with low ambulatory utilization in Outreach. Generalizing from in care populations may not be warranted, while addressing heavy alcohol use may be effective at improving utilization of care for hard-to-reach HIV-positive populations.",
keywords = "Access, HIV, Outreach, Utilization, Vulnerable populations",
author = "Cunningham, {William E.} and Sohler, {Nancy L.} and Carol Tobias and Drainoni, {Mari Lynn} and Judith Bradford and Cynthia Davis and Cabral, {Howard J.} and Cunningham, {Chinazo O.} and Lois Eldred and Wong, {Mitchell D.}",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1097/01.mlr.0000242942.17968.69",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "1038--1047",
journal = "Medical Care",
issn = "0025-7079",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Health services utilization for people with HIV infection

T2 - Comparison of a population targeted for outreach with the U.S. population in care

AU - Cunningham, William E.

AU - Sohler, Nancy L.

AU - Tobias, Carol

AU - Drainoni, Mari Lynn

AU - Bradford, Judith

AU - Davis, Cynthia

AU - Cabral, Howard J.

AU - Cunningham, Chinazo O.

AU - Eldred, Lois

AU - Wong, Mitchell D.

PY - 2006/11

Y1 - 2006/11

N2 - BACKGROUND: Many persons with HIV infection do not receive consistent ambulatory medical care and are excluded from studies of patients in medical care. However, these hard-to-reach groups are important to study because they may be in greatest need of services. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the sociodemographic, clinical, and health care utilization characteristics of a multisite sample of HIV-positive persons who were hard to reach with a nationally representative cohort of persons with HIV infection who were receiving care from known HIV providers in the United States and examined whether the independent correlates of low ambulatory utilization differed between the 2 samples. METHODS: We compared sociodemographic, clinical, and health care utilization characteristics in 2 samples of adults with HIV infection: 1286 persons from 16 sites across the United States interviewed in 2001-2002 for the Targeted HIV Outreach and Intervention Initiative (Outreach), a study of underserved persons targeted for supportive outreach services; and 2267 persons from the HIV Costs and Services Utilization Study (HCSUS), a probability sample of persons receiving care who were interviewed in 1998. We conducted logistic regression analyses to identify differences between the 2 samples in sociodemographic and clinical associations with ambulatory medical visits. RESULTS: Compared with the HCSUS sample, the Outreach sample had notably greater proportions of black respondents (59% vs. 32%, P = 0.0001), Hispanics (20% vs. 16%), Spanish-speakers (9% vs. 2%, P = 0.02), those with low socioeconomic status (annual income <$10,000 75% vs. 45%, P = 0.0001), the unemployed, and persons with homelessness, no insurance, and heroin or cocaine use (58% vs. 47%, P = 0.05). They also were more likely to have fewer than 2 ambulatory visits (26% vs. 16%, P = 0.0001), more likely to have emergency room visits or hospitalizations in the prior 6 months, and less likely to be on antiretroviral treatment (82% vs. 58%, P = 0.0001). Nearly all these differences persisted after stratifying for level of ambulatory utilization (fewer than 2 vs. 2 or more in the last 6 months). In multivariate analysis, several variables showed significantly different associations in the 2 samples (interacted) with low ambulatory care utilization. The variables with significant interactions (P values for interaction shown below) had very different adjusted odds ratios (and 95% confidence intervals) for low ambulatory care utilization: age greater than 50 (Outreach 0.55 [0.35-0.88], HCSUS 1.17 [0.65-2.11)], P = 0.05), Hispanic ethnicity (Outreach 0.81 [0.39-1.69], HCSUS 2.34 [1.56-3.52], P = 0.02), low income (Outreach 0.73 [0.56-0.96], HCSUS 1.35 [1.04-1.75], P = 0.002), and heavy alcohol use (Outreach 1.74 [1.23-2.45], HCSUS 1.00 [0.73-1.37], P = 0.02). Having CD4 count less than 50 was associated with elevated odds of low ambulatory medical visits in the Outreach sample (1.53 [1.00-2.36], P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with HCSUS, the Outreach sample had far greater proportions of traditionally vulnerable groups, and were less likely to be in care if they had low CD4 counts. Furthermore, heavy alcohol use was only associated with low ambulatory utilization in Outreach. Generalizing from in care populations may not be warranted, while addressing heavy alcohol use may be effective at improving utilization of care for hard-to-reach HIV-positive populations.

AB - BACKGROUND: Many persons with HIV infection do not receive consistent ambulatory medical care and are excluded from studies of patients in medical care. However, these hard-to-reach groups are important to study because they may be in greatest need of services. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the sociodemographic, clinical, and health care utilization characteristics of a multisite sample of HIV-positive persons who were hard to reach with a nationally representative cohort of persons with HIV infection who were receiving care from known HIV providers in the United States and examined whether the independent correlates of low ambulatory utilization differed between the 2 samples. METHODS: We compared sociodemographic, clinical, and health care utilization characteristics in 2 samples of adults with HIV infection: 1286 persons from 16 sites across the United States interviewed in 2001-2002 for the Targeted HIV Outreach and Intervention Initiative (Outreach), a study of underserved persons targeted for supportive outreach services; and 2267 persons from the HIV Costs and Services Utilization Study (HCSUS), a probability sample of persons receiving care who were interviewed in 1998. We conducted logistic regression analyses to identify differences between the 2 samples in sociodemographic and clinical associations with ambulatory medical visits. RESULTS: Compared with the HCSUS sample, the Outreach sample had notably greater proportions of black respondents (59% vs. 32%, P = 0.0001), Hispanics (20% vs. 16%), Spanish-speakers (9% vs. 2%, P = 0.02), those with low socioeconomic status (annual income <$10,000 75% vs. 45%, P = 0.0001), the unemployed, and persons with homelessness, no insurance, and heroin or cocaine use (58% vs. 47%, P = 0.05). They also were more likely to have fewer than 2 ambulatory visits (26% vs. 16%, P = 0.0001), more likely to have emergency room visits or hospitalizations in the prior 6 months, and less likely to be on antiretroviral treatment (82% vs. 58%, P = 0.0001). Nearly all these differences persisted after stratifying for level of ambulatory utilization (fewer than 2 vs. 2 or more in the last 6 months). In multivariate analysis, several variables showed significantly different associations in the 2 samples (interacted) with low ambulatory care utilization. The variables with significant interactions (P values for interaction shown below) had very different adjusted odds ratios (and 95% confidence intervals) for low ambulatory care utilization: age greater than 50 (Outreach 0.55 [0.35-0.88], HCSUS 1.17 [0.65-2.11)], P = 0.05), Hispanic ethnicity (Outreach 0.81 [0.39-1.69], HCSUS 2.34 [1.56-3.52], P = 0.02), low income (Outreach 0.73 [0.56-0.96], HCSUS 1.35 [1.04-1.75], P = 0.002), and heavy alcohol use (Outreach 1.74 [1.23-2.45], HCSUS 1.00 [0.73-1.37], P = 0.02). Having CD4 count less than 50 was associated with elevated odds of low ambulatory medical visits in the Outreach sample (1.53 [1.00-2.36], P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with HCSUS, the Outreach sample had far greater proportions of traditionally vulnerable groups, and were less likely to be in care if they had low CD4 counts. Furthermore, heavy alcohol use was only associated with low ambulatory utilization in Outreach. Generalizing from in care populations may not be warranted, while addressing heavy alcohol use may be effective at improving utilization of care for hard-to-reach HIV-positive populations.

KW - Access

KW - HIV

KW - Outreach

KW - Utilization

KW - Vulnerable populations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750549902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750549902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.mlr.0000242942.17968.69

DO - 10.1097/01.mlr.0000242942.17968.69

M3 - Article

C2 - 17063136

AN - SCOPUS:33750549902

VL - 44

SP - 1038

EP - 1047

JO - Medical Care

JF - Medical Care

SN - 0025-7079

IS - 11

ER -