Health Maintenance Organizations vs Indemnity Insurance for Children With Chronic Illness: Trading Gaps in Coverage

Sarah McCue Horwitz, Ruth E. K. Stein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There has been increasing discussion about the potential of health maintenance organizations to provide improved access to and coordination of care for children with complex conditions. This study compares benefits for a sample of health maintenance organizations and traditional indemnity insurers in Connecticut. We conclude that in Connecticut neither health maintenance organizations nor traditional indemnity insurers currently offer comprehensive systems of care to these children. Health maintenance organizations offer preventive care and are easier systems to access. However, for children with chronic conditions, health maintenance organizations have some problematic restrictions, including a lag between start of employment and activation of health care benefits. Both health maintenance organizations and traditional indemnity insurers tend to have restrictions for specific services needed by children with chronic illnesses, such as medical equipment and mental health services. Case managers in both systems tend to control expenditures rather than to coordinate care. Representatives of both systems predict additional restrictions in the future. Our data suggest the need for more extensive evaluation of the generalizability of these findings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)581-586
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Diseases of Children
Volume144
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1990

Fingerprint

Health Maintenance Organizations
Insurance
Chronic Disease
Insurance Carriers
Child Care
Preventive Medicine
Mental Health Services
Insurance Benefits
Health Expenditures
Delivery of Health Care
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

@article{9c14263083da47729da1661c3bafb6a5,
title = "Health Maintenance Organizations vs Indemnity Insurance for Children With Chronic Illness: Trading Gaps in Coverage",
abstract = "There has been increasing discussion about the potential of health maintenance organizations to provide improved access to and coordination of care for children with complex conditions. This study compares benefits for a sample of health maintenance organizations and traditional indemnity insurers in Connecticut. We conclude that in Connecticut neither health maintenance organizations nor traditional indemnity insurers currently offer comprehensive systems of care to these children. Health maintenance organizations offer preventive care and are easier systems to access. However, for children with chronic conditions, health maintenance organizations have some problematic restrictions, including a lag between start of employment and activation of health care benefits. Both health maintenance organizations and traditional indemnity insurers tend to have restrictions for specific services needed by children with chronic illnesses, such as medical equipment and mental health services. Case managers in both systems tend to control expenditures rather than to coordinate care. Representatives of both systems predict additional restrictions in the future. Our data suggest the need for more extensive evaluation of the generalizability of these findings.",
author = "Horwitz, {Sarah McCue} and Stein, {Ruth E. K.}",
year = "1990",
doi = "10.1001/archpedi.1990.02150290075032",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "144",
pages = "581--586",
journal = "JAMA Pediatrics",
issn = "2168-6203",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Health Maintenance Organizations vs Indemnity Insurance for Children With Chronic Illness

T2 - Trading Gaps in Coverage

AU - Horwitz, Sarah McCue

AU - Stein, Ruth E. K.

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - There has been increasing discussion about the potential of health maintenance organizations to provide improved access to and coordination of care for children with complex conditions. This study compares benefits for a sample of health maintenance organizations and traditional indemnity insurers in Connecticut. We conclude that in Connecticut neither health maintenance organizations nor traditional indemnity insurers currently offer comprehensive systems of care to these children. Health maintenance organizations offer preventive care and are easier systems to access. However, for children with chronic conditions, health maintenance organizations have some problematic restrictions, including a lag between start of employment and activation of health care benefits. Both health maintenance organizations and traditional indemnity insurers tend to have restrictions for specific services needed by children with chronic illnesses, such as medical equipment and mental health services. Case managers in both systems tend to control expenditures rather than to coordinate care. Representatives of both systems predict additional restrictions in the future. Our data suggest the need for more extensive evaluation of the generalizability of these findings.

AB - There has been increasing discussion about the potential of health maintenance organizations to provide improved access to and coordination of care for children with complex conditions. This study compares benefits for a sample of health maintenance organizations and traditional indemnity insurers in Connecticut. We conclude that in Connecticut neither health maintenance organizations nor traditional indemnity insurers currently offer comprehensive systems of care to these children. Health maintenance organizations offer preventive care and are easier systems to access. However, for children with chronic conditions, health maintenance organizations have some problematic restrictions, including a lag between start of employment and activation of health care benefits. Both health maintenance organizations and traditional indemnity insurers tend to have restrictions for specific services needed by children with chronic illnesses, such as medical equipment and mental health services. Case managers in both systems tend to control expenditures rather than to coordinate care. Representatives of both systems predict additional restrictions in the future. Our data suggest the need for more extensive evaluation of the generalizability of these findings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025276561&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025276561&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archpedi.1990.02150290075032

DO - 10.1001/archpedi.1990.02150290075032

M3 - Article

C2 - 2330927

AN - SCOPUS:0025276561

VL - 144

SP - 581

EP - 586

JO - JAMA Pediatrics

JF - JAMA Pediatrics

SN - 2168-6203

IS - 5

ER -