TY - JOUR
T1 - Health Maintenance Organizations vs Indemnity Insurance for Children With Chronic Illness
T2 - Trading Gaps in Coverage
AU - Horwitz, Sarah Mc Cue
AU - Stein, Ruth E.K.
PY - 1990/5
Y1 - 1990/5
N2 - There has been increasing discussion about the potential of health maintenance organizations to provide improved access to and coordination of care for children with complex conditions. This study compares benefits for a sample of health maintenance organizations and traditional indemnity insurers in Connecticut. We conclude that in Connecticut neither health maintenance organizations nor traditional indemnity insurers currently offer comprehensive systems of care to these children. Health maintenance organizations offer preventive care and are easier systems to access. However, for children with chronic conditions, health maintenance organizations have some problematic restrictions, including a lag between start of employment and activation of health care benefits. Both health maintenance organizations and traditional indemnity insurers tend to have restrictions for specific services needed by children with chronic illnesses, such as medical equipment and mental health services. Case managers in both systems tend to control expenditures rather than to coordinate care. Representatives of both systems predict additional restrictions in the future. Our data suggest the need for more extensive evaluation of the generalizability of these findings.
AB - There has been increasing discussion about the potential of health maintenance organizations to provide improved access to and coordination of care for children with complex conditions. This study compares benefits for a sample of health maintenance organizations and traditional indemnity insurers in Connecticut. We conclude that in Connecticut neither health maintenance organizations nor traditional indemnity insurers currently offer comprehensive systems of care to these children. Health maintenance organizations offer preventive care and are easier systems to access. However, for children with chronic conditions, health maintenance organizations have some problematic restrictions, including a lag between start of employment and activation of health care benefits. Both health maintenance organizations and traditional indemnity insurers tend to have restrictions for specific services needed by children with chronic illnesses, such as medical equipment and mental health services. Case managers in both systems tend to control expenditures rather than to coordinate care. Representatives of both systems predict additional restrictions in the future. Our data suggest the need for more extensive evaluation of the generalizability of these findings.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025276561&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025276561&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/archpedi.1990.02150290075032
DO - 10.1001/archpedi.1990.02150290075032
M3 - Article
C2 - 2330927
AN - SCOPUS:0025276561
SN - 0002-922X
VL - 144
SP - 581
EP - 586
JO - American Journal of Diseases of Children
JF - American Journal of Diseases of Children
IS - 5
ER -