Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 7: Lumbar fusion for intractable low-back pain without stenosis or spondylolisthesis

Jason C. Eck, Alok Sharan, Zoher Ghogawala, Daniel K. Resnick, William C. Watters, Raveen V. Mummaneni, Andrew T. Dailey, Tanvir F. Choudhri, Michael W. Groff, Jeffrey C. Wang, Sanjay S. Dhall, Michael G. Kaiser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Establishing an appropriate treatment strategy for patients presenting with low-back pain, in the absence of stenosis or spondylolisthesis, remains a controversial subject. Inherent to this situation is often an inability to adequately identify the source of low-back pain to justify various treatment recommendations, such as lumbar fusion. The current evidence does not identify a single best treatment alternative for these patients. Based on a number of prospective, randomized trials, comparable outcomes, for patients presenting with 1- or 2-level degenerative disc disease, have been demonstrated following either lumbar fusion or a comprehensive rehabilitation program with a cognitive element. Limited access to such comprehensive rehabilitative programs may prove problematic when pursuing this alternative. For patients whose pain is refractory to conservative care, lumbar fusion is recommended. Limitations of these studies preclude the ability to present the most robust recommendation in support of lumbar fusion. A number of lesser-quality studies, primarily case series, also support the use of lumbar fusion in this patient population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)42-47
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Neurosurgery: Spine
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Spondylolisthesis
Low Back Pain
Pathologic Constriction
Spine
Guidelines
Intractable Pain
Therapeutics
Rehabilitation
Population

Keywords

  • Low-back pain
  • Lumbar fusion
  • Lumbar spine
  • Lumbar spondylosis
  • Practice guidelines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery
  • Neurology

Cite this

Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 7 : Lumbar fusion for intractable low-back pain without stenosis or spondylolisthesis. / Eck, Jason C.; Sharan, Alok; Ghogawala, Zoher; Resnick, Daniel K.; Watters, William C.; Mummaneni, Raveen V.; Dailey, Andrew T.; Choudhri, Tanvir F.; Groff, Michael W.; Wang, Jeffrey C.; Dhall, Sanjay S.; Kaiser, Michael G.

In: Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2014, p. 42-47.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Eck, JC, Sharan, A, Ghogawala, Z, Resnick, DK, Watters, WC, Mummaneni, RV, Dailey, AT, Choudhri, TF, Groff, MW, Wang, JC, Dhall, SS & Kaiser, MG 2014, 'Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 7: Lumbar fusion for intractable low-back pain without stenosis or spondylolisthesis', Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 42-47. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14270
Eck, Jason C. ; Sharan, Alok ; Ghogawala, Zoher ; Resnick, Daniel K. ; Watters, William C. ; Mummaneni, Raveen V. ; Dailey, Andrew T. ; Choudhri, Tanvir F. ; Groff, Michael W. ; Wang, Jeffrey C. ; Dhall, Sanjay S. ; Kaiser, Michael G. / Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 7 : Lumbar fusion for intractable low-back pain without stenosis or spondylolisthesis. In: Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2014 ; Vol. 21, No. 1. pp. 42-47.
@article{7119ac6091be436a87e395345d2f8082,
title = "Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 7: Lumbar fusion for intractable low-back pain without stenosis or spondylolisthesis",
abstract = "Establishing an appropriate treatment strategy for patients presenting with low-back pain, in the absence of stenosis or spondylolisthesis, remains a controversial subject. Inherent to this situation is often an inability to adequately identify the source of low-back pain to justify various treatment recommendations, such as lumbar fusion. The current evidence does not identify a single best treatment alternative for these patients. Based on a number of prospective, randomized trials, comparable outcomes, for patients presenting with 1- or 2-level degenerative disc disease, have been demonstrated following either lumbar fusion or a comprehensive rehabilitation program with a cognitive element. Limited access to such comprehensive rehabilitative programs may prove problematic when pursuing this alternative. For patients whose pain is refractory to conservative care, lumbar fusion is recommended. Limitations of these studies preclude the ability to present the most robust recommendation in support of lumbar fusion. A number of lesser-quality studies, primarily case series, also support the use of lumbar fusion in this patient population.",
keywords = "Low-back pain, Lumbar fusion, Lumbar spine, Lumbar spondylosis, Practice guidelines",
author = "Eck, {Jason C.} and Alok Sharan and Zoher Ghogawala and Resnick, {Daniel K.} and Watters, {William C.} and Mummaneni, {Raveen V.} and Dailey, {Andrew T.} and Choudhri, {Tanvir F.} and Groff, {Michael W.} and Wang, {Jeffrey C.} and Dhall, {Sanjay S.} and Kaiser, {Michael G.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14270",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "42--47",
journal = "Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine",
issn = "1547-5654",
publisher = "American Association of Neurological Surgeons",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 7

T2 - Lumbar fusion for intractable low-back pain without stenosis or spondylolisthesis

AU - Eck, Jason C.

AU - Sharan, Alok

AU - Ghogawala, Zoher

AU - Resnick, Daniel K.

AU - Watters, William C.

AU - Mummaneni, Raveen V.

AU - Dailey, Andrew T.

AU - Choudhri, Tanvir F.

AU - Groff, Michael W.

AU - Wang, Jeffrey C.

AU - Dhall, Sanjay S.

AU - Kaiser, Michael G.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Establishing an appropriate treatment strategy for patients presenting with low-back pain, in the absence of stenosis or spondylolisthesis, remains a controversial subject. Inherent to this situation is often an inability to adequately identify the source of low-back pain to justify various treatment recommendations, such as lumbar fusion. The current evidence does not identify a single best treatment alternative for these patients. Based on a number of prospective, randomized trials, comparable outcomes, for patients presenting with 1- or 2-level degenerative disc disease, have been demonstrated following either lumbar fusion or a comprehensive rehabilitation program with a cognitive element. Limited access to such comprehensive rehabilitative programs may prove problematic when pursuing this alternative. For patients whose pain is refractory to conservative care, lumbar fusion is recommended. Limitations of these studies preclude the ability to present the most robust recommendation in support of lumbar fusion. A number of lesser-quality studies, primarily case series, also support the use of lumbar fusion in this patient population.

AB - Establishing an appropriate treatment strategy for patients presenting with low-back pain, in the absence of stenosis or spondylolisthesis, remains a controversial subject. Inherent to this situation is often an inability to adequately identify the source of low-back pain to justify various treatment recommendations, such as lumbar fusion. The current evidence does not identify a single best treatment alternative for these patients. Based on a number of prospective, randomized trials, comparable outcomes, for patients presenting with 1- or 2-level degenerative disc disease, have been demonstrated following either lumbar fusion or a comprehensive rehabilitation program with a cognitive element. Limited access to such comprehensive rehabilitative programs may prove problematic when pursuing this alternative. For patients whose pain is refractory to conservative care, lumbar fusion is recommended. Limitations of these studies preclude the ability to present the most robust recommendation in support of lumbar fusion. A number of lesser-quality studies, primarily case series, also support the use of lumbar fusion in this patient population.

KW - Low-back pain

KW - Lumbar fusion

KW - Lumbar spine

KW - Lumbar spondylosis

KW - Practice guidelines

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903892589&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84903892589&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14270

DO - 10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14270

M3 - Article

C2 - 24980584

AN - SCOPUS:84903892589

VL - 21

SP - 42

EP - 47

JO - Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

JF - Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

SN - 1547-5654

IS - 1

ER -