Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 17: Bone growth stimulators as an adjunct for lumbar fusion

Michael G. Kaiser, Jason C. Eck, Michael W. Groff, Zoher Ghogawala, William C. Watters, Andrew T. Dailey, Daniel K. Resnick, Tanvir F. Choudhri, Alok Sharan, Jeffrey C. Wang, Sanjay S. Dhall, Praveen V. Mummaneni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The relationship between the formation of a solid arthrodesis and electrical and electromagnetic energy is well established; most of the information on the topic, however, pertains to the healing of long bone fractures. The use of both invasive and noninvasive means to supply this energy and supplement spinal fusions has been investigated. Three forms of electrical stimulation are routinely used: direct current stimulation (DCS), pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation (PEMFS), and capacitive coupled electrical stimulation (CCES). Only DCS requires the placement of electrodes within the fusion substrate and is inserted at the time of surgery. Since publication of the original guidelines, few studies have investigated the use of bone growth stimulators. Based on the current review, no conflict with the previous recommendations was generated. The use of DCS is recommended as an option for patients younger than 60 years of age, since a positive effect on fusion has been observed. The same, however, cannot be stated for patients over 60, because DCS did not appear to have an impact on fusion rates in this population. No study was reviewed that investigated the use of CCES or the routine use of PEMFS. A single low-level study demonstrated a positive impact of PEMFS on patients undergoing revision surgery for pseudarthrosis, but this single study is insufficient 0 to recommend for or against the use of PEMFS in this patient population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)133-139
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Neurosurgery: Spine
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Electromagnetic Fields
Bone Development
Spine
Guidelines
Electric Stimulation
Electromagnetic Radiation
Spinal Fusion
Pseudarthrosis
Arthrodesis
Bone Fractures
Reoperation
Population
Publications
Electrodes

Keywords

  • Bone growth stimulator
  • Lumbar fusion
  • Lumbar spine
  • Practice guidelines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery
  • Neurology

Cite this

Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 17 : Bone growth stimulators as an adjunct for lumbar fusion. / Kaiser, Michael G.; Eck, Jason C.; Groff, Michael W.; Ghogawala, Zoher; Watters, William C.; Dailey, Andrew T.; Resnick, Daniel K.; Choudhri, Tanvir F.; Sharan, Alok; Wang, Jeffrey C.; Dhall, Sanjay S.; Mummaneni, Praveen V.

In: Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2014, p. 133-139.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kaiser, MG, Eck, JC, Groff, MW, Ghogawala, Z, Watters, WC, Dailey, AT, Resnick, DK, Choudhri, TF, Sharan, A, Wang, JC, Dhall, SS & Mummaneni, PV 2014, 'Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 17: Bone growth stimulators as an adjunct for lumbar fusion', Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 133-139. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14326
Kaiser, Michael G. ; Eck, Jason C. ; Groff, Michael W. ; Ghogawala, Zoher ; Watters, William C. ; Dailey, Andrew T. ; Resnick, Daniel K. ; Choudhri, Tanvir F. ; Sharan, Alok ; Wang, Jeffrey C. ; Dhall, Sanjay S. ; Mummaneni, Praveen V. / Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 17 : Bone growth stimulators as an adjunct for lumbar fusion. In: Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2014 ; Vol. 21, No. 1. pp. 133-139.
@article{8dcd2ba92ba24a23b6df9bc895449299,
title = "Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 17: Bone growth stimulators as an adjunct for lumbar fusion",
abstract = "The relationship between the formation of a solid arthrodesis and electrical and electromagnetic energy is well established; most of the information on the topic, however, pertains to the healing of long bone fractures. The use of both invasive and noninvasive means to supply this energy and supplement spinal fusions has been investigated. Three forms of electrical stimulation are routinely used: direct current stimulation (DCS), pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation (PEMFS), and capacitive coupled electrical stimulation (CCES). Only DCS requires the placement of electrodes within the fusion substrate and is inserted at the time of surgery. Since publication of the original guidelines, few studies have investigated the use of bone growth stimulators. Based on the current review, no conflict with the previous recommendations was generated. The use of DCS is recommended as an option for patients younger than 60 years of age, since a positive effect on fusion has been observed. The same, however, cannot be stated for patients over 60, because DCS did not appear to have an impact on fusion rates in this population. No study was reviewed that investigated the use of CCES or the routine use of PEMFS. A single low-level study demonstrated a positive impact of PEMFS on patients undergoing revision surgery for pseudarthrosis, but this single study is insufficient 0 to recommend for or against the use of PEMFS in this patient population.",
keywords = "Bone growth stimulator, Lumbar fusion, Lumbar spine, Practice guidelines",
author = "Kaiser, {Michael G.} and Eck, {Jason C.} and Groff, {Michael W.} and Zoher Ghogawala and Watters, {William C.} and Dailey, {Andrew T.} and Resnick, {Daniel K.} and Choudhri, {Tanvir F.} and Alok Sharan and Wang, {Jeffrey C.} and Dhall, {Sanjay S.} and Mummaneni, {Praveen V.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14326",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "133--139",
journal = "Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine",
issn = "1547-5654",
publisher = "American Association of Neurological Surgeons",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 17

T2 - Bone growth stimulators as an adjunct for lumbar fusion

AU - Kaiser, Michael G.

AU - Eck, Jason C.

AU - Groff, Michael W.

AU - Ghogawala, Zoher

AU - Watters, William C.

AU - Dailey, Andrew T.

AU - Resnick, Daniel K.

AU - Choudhri, Tanvir F.

AU - Sharan, Alok

AU - Wang, Jeffrey C.

AU - Dhall, Sanjay S.

AU - Mummaneni, Praveen V.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The relationship between the formation of a solid arthrodesis and electrical and electromagnetic energy is well established; most of the information on the topic, however, pertains to the healing of long bone fractures. The use of both invasive and noninvasive means to supply this energy and supplement spinal fusions has been investigated. Three forms of electrical stimulation are routinely used: direct current stimulation (DCS), pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation (PEMFS), and capacitive coupled electrical stimulation (CCES). Only DCS requires the placement of electrodes within the fusion substrate and is inserted at the time of surgery. Since publication of the original guidelines, few studies have investigated the use of bone growth stimulators. Based on the current review, no conflict with the previous recommendations was generated. The use of DCS is recommended as an option for patients younger than 60 years of age, since a positive effect on fusion has been observed. The same, however, cannot be stated for patients over 60, because DCS did not appear to have an impact on fusion rates in this population. No study was reviewed that investigated the use of CCES or the routine use of PEMFS. A single low-level study demonstrated a positive impact of PEMFS on patients undergoing revision surgery for pseudarthrosis, but this single study is insufficient 0 to recommend for or against the use of PEMFS in this patient population.

AB - The relationship between the formation of a solid arthrodesis and electrical and electromagnetic energy is well established; most of the information on the topic, however, pertains to the healing of long bone fractures. The use of both invasive and noninvasive means to supply this energy and supplement spinal fusions has been investigated. Three forms of electrical stimulation are routinely used: direct current stimulation (DCS), pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation (PEMFS), and capacitive coupled electrical stimulation (CCES). Only DCS requires the placement of electrodes within the fusion substrate and is inserted at the time of surgery. Since publication of the original guidelines, few studies have investigated the use of bone growth stimulators. Based on the current review, no conflict with the previous recommendations was generated. The use of DCS is recommended as an option for patients younger than 60 years of age, since a positive effect on fusion has been observed. The same, however, cannot be stated for patients over 60, because DCS did not appear to have an impact on fusion rates in this population. No study was reviewed that investigated the use of CCES or the routine use of PEMFS. A single low-level study demonstrated a positive impact of PEMFS on patients undergoing revision surgery for pseudarthrosis, but this single study is insufficient 0 to recommend for or against the use of PEMFS in this patient population.

KW - Bone growth stimulator

KW - Lumbar fusion

KW - Lumbar spine

KW - Practice guidelines

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903890655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84903890655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14326

DO - 10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14326

M3 - Article

C2 - 24980594

AN - SCOPUS:84903890655

VL - 21

SP - 133

EP - 139

JO - Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

JF - Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

SN - 1547-5654

IS - 1

ER -