Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 11

Interbody techniques for lumbar fusion

Praveen V. Mummaneni, Sanjay S. Dhall, Jason C. Eck, Michael W. Groff, Zoher Ghogawala, William C. Watters, Andrew T. Dailey, Daniel K. Resnick, Tanvir F. Choudhri, Alok Sharan, Jeffrey C. Wang, MIchael G. Kaiser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Interbody fusion techniques have been promoted as an adjunct to lumbar fusion procedures in an effort to enhance fusion rates and potentially improve clinical outcome. The medical evidence continues to suggest that interbody techniques are associated with higher fusion rates compared with posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF) in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis who demonstrate preoperative instability. There is no conclusive evidence demonstrating improved clinical or radiographic outcomes based on the different interbody fusion techniques. The addition of a PLF when posterior or anterior interbody lumbar fusion is performed remains an option, although due to increased cost and complications, it is not recommended. No substantial clinical benefit has been demonstrated when a PLF is included with an interbody fusion. For lumbar degenerative disc disease without instability, there is moderate evidence that the standalone anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) has better clinical outcomes than the ALIF plus instrumented, open PLF. With regard to type of interbody spacer used, frozen allograft is associated with lower pseudarthrosis rates compared with freeze-dried allograft; however, this was not associated with a difference in clinical outcome.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)67-74
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Neurosurgery: Spine
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Allografts
Spine
Guidelines
Spondylolisthesis
Pseudarthrosis
Costs and Cost Analysis
Intervertebral disc disease

Keywords

  • Bone graft
  • Fusion
  • Lumbar spine
  • Practice guidelines
  • Spondylosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery
  • Neurology

Cite this

Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 11 : Interbody techniques for lumbar fusion. / Mummaneni, Praveen V.; Dhall, Sanjay S.; Eck, Jason C.; Groff, Michael W.; Ghogawala, Zoher; Watters, William C.; Dailey, Andrew T.; Resnick, Daniel K.; Choudhri, Tanvir F.; Sharan, Alok; Wang, Jeffrey C.; Kaiser, MIchael G.

In: Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2014, p. 67-74.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mummaneni, PV, Dhall, SS, Eck, JC, Groff, MW, Ghogawala, Z, Watters, WC, Dailey, AT, Resnick, DK, Choudhri, TF, Sharan, A, Wang, JC & Kaiser, MIG 2014, 'Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 11: Interbody techniques for lumbar fusion', Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 67-74. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14276
Mummaneni, Praveen V. ; Dhall, Sanjay S. ; Eck, Jason C. ; Groff, Michael W. ; Ghogawala, Zoher ; Watters, William C. ; Dailey, Andrew T. ; Resnick, Daniel K. ; Choudhri, Tanvir F. ; Sharan, Alok ; Wang, Jeffrey C. ; Kaiser, MIchael G. / Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 11 : Interbody techniques for lumbar fusion. In: Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2014 ; Vol. 21, No. 1. pp. 67-74.
@article{cf81df078ce944de82dc2d0e4a4b2847,
title = "Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 11: Interbody techniques for lumbar fusion",
abstract = "Interbody fusion techniques have been promoted as an adjunct to lumbar fusion procedures in an effort to enhance fusion rates and potentially improve clinical outcome. The medical evidence continues to suggest that interbody techniques are associated with higher fusion rates compared with posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF) in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis who demonstrate preoperative instability. There is no conclusive evidence demonstrating improved clinical or radiographic outcomes based on the different interbody fusion techniques. The addition of a PLF when posterior or anterior interbody lumbar fusion is performed remains an option, although due to increased cost and complications, it is not recommended. No substantial clinical benefit has been demonstrated when a PLF is included with an interbody fusion. For lumbar degenerative disc disease without instability, there is moderate evidence that the standalone anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) has better clinical outcomes than the ALIF plus instrumented, open PLF. With regard to type of interbody spacer used, frozen allograft is associated with lower pseudarthrosis rates compared with freeze-dried allograft; however, this was not associated with a difference in clinical outcome.",
keywords = "Bone graft, Fusion, Lumbar spine, Practice guidelines, Spondylosis",
author = "Mummaneni, {Praveen V.} and Dhall, {Sanjay S.} and Eck, {Jason C.} and Groff, {Michael W.} and Zoher Ghogawala and Watters, {William C.} and Dailey, {Andrew T.} and Resnick, {Daniel K.} and Choudhri, {Tanvir F.} and Alok Sharan and Wang, {Jeffrey C.} and Kaiser, {MIchael G.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14276",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "67--74",
journal = "Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine",
issn = "1547-5654",
publisher = "American Association of Neurological Surgeons",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 11

T2 - Interbody techniques for lumbar fusion

AU - Mummaneni, Praveen V.

AU - Dhall, Sanjay S.

AU - Eck, Jason C.

AU - Groff, Michael W.

AU - Ghogawala, Zoher

AU - Watters, William C.

AU - Dailey, Andrew T.

AU - Resnick, Daniel K.

AU - Choudhri, Tanvir F.

AU - Sharan, Alok

AU - Wang, Jeffrey C.

AU - Kaiser, MIchael G.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Interbody fusion techniques have been promoted as an adjunct to lumbar fusion procedures in an effort to enhance fusion rates and potentially improve clinical outcome. The medical evidence continues to suggest that interbody techniques are associated with higher fusion rates compared with posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF) in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis who demonstrate preoperative instability. There is no conclusive evidence demonstrating improved clinical or radiographic outcomes based on the different interbody fusion techniques. The addition of a PLF when posterior or anterior interbody lumbar fusion is performed remains an option, although due to increased cost and complications, it is not recommended. No substantial clinical benefit has been demonstrated when a PLF is included with an interbody fusion. For lumbar degenerative disc disease without instability, there is moderate evidence that the standalone anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) has better clinical outcomes than the ALIF plus instrumented, open PLF. With regard to type of interbody spacer used, frozen allograft is associated with lower pseudarthrosis rates compared with freeze-dried allograft; however, this was not associated with a difference in clinical outcome.

AB - Interbody fusion techniques have been promoted as an adjunct to lumbar fusion procedures in an effort to enhance fusion rates and potentially improve clinical outcome. The medical evidence continues to suggest that interbody techniques are associated with higher fusion rates compared with posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF) in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis who demonstrate preoperative instability. There is no conclusive evidence demonstrating improved clinical or radiographic outcomes based on the different interbody fusion techniques. The addition of a PLF when posterior or anterior interbody lumbar fusion is performed remains an option, although due to increased cost and complications, it is not recommended. No substantial clinical benefit has been demonstrated when a PLF is included with an interbody fusion. For lumbar degenerative disc disease without instability, there is moderate evidence that the standalone anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) has better clinical outcomes than the ALIF plus instrumented, open PLF. With regard to type of interbody spacer used, frozen allograft is associated with lower pseudarthrosis rates compared with freeze-dried allograft; however, this was not associated with a difference in clinical outcome.

KW - Bone graft

KW - Fusion

KW - Lumbar spine

KW - Practice guidelines

KW - Spondylosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903883316&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84903883316&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14276

DO - 10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14276

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 67

EP - 74

JO - Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

JF - Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

SN - 1547-5654

IS - 1

ER -