Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 5

Correlation between radiographic outcome and function

Sanjay S. Dhall, Tanvir F. Choudhri, Jason C. Eck, Michael W. Groff, Zoher Ghogawala, William C. Watters, Andrew T. Dailey, Daniel K. Resnick, Alok Sharan, Praveen V. Mummaneni, Jeffrey C. Wang, Michael G. Kaiser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In an effort to diminish pain or progressive instability, due to either the pathological process or as a result of surgical decompression, one of the primary goals of a fusion procedure is to achieve a solid arthrodesis. Assuming that pain and disability result from lost mechanical integrity of the spine, the objective of a fusion across an unstable segment is to eliminate pathological motion and improve clinical outcome. However, conclusive evidence of this correlation, between successful fusion and clinical outcome, remains elusive, and thus the necessity of documenting successful arthrodesis through radiographic analysis remains debatable. Although a definitive cause and effect relationship has not been demonstrated, there is moderate evidence that demonstrates a positive association between radiographic presence of fusion and improved clinical outcome. Due to this growing body of literature, it is recommended that strategies intended to enhance the potential for radiographic fusion are considered when performing a lumbar arthrodesis for degenerative spine disease.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)31-36
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Neurosurgery: Spine
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Arthrodesis
Spine
Guidelines
Surgical Decompression
Pain
Pathologic Processes

Keywords

  • Fusion
  • Lumbar spine
  • Practice guidelines
  • Treatment outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery
  • Neurology

Cite this

Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 5 : Correlation between radiographic outcome and function. / Dhall, Sanjay S.; Choudhri, Tanvir F.; Eck, Jason C.; Groff, Michael W.; Ghogawala, Zoher; Watters, William C.; Dailey, Andrew T.; Resnick, Daniel K.; Sharan, Alok; Mummaneni, Praveen V.; Wang, Jeffrey C.; Kaiser, Michael G.

In: Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2014, p. 31-36.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dhall, SS, Choudhri, TF, Eck, JC, Groff, MW, Ghogawala, Z, Watters, WC, Dailey, AT, Resnick, DK, Sharan, A, Mummaneni, PV, Wang, JC & Kaiser, MG 2014, 'Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 5: Correlation between radiographic outcome and function', Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 31-36. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14268
Dhall, Sanjay S. ; Choudhri, Tanvir F. ; Eck, Jason C. ; Groff, Michael W. ; Ghogawala, Zoher ; Watters, William C. ; Dailey, Andrew T. ; Resnick, Daniel K. ; Sharan, Alok ; Mummaneni, Praveen V. ; Wang, Jeffrey C. ; Kaiser, Michael G. / Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 5 : Correlation between radiographic outcome and function. In: Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2014 ; Vol. 21, No. 1. pp. 31-36.
@article{9018c4518f794bed90551214ee0924a3,
title = "Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 5: Correlation between radiographic outcome and function",
abstract = "In an effort to diminish pain or progressive instability, due to either the pathological process or as a result of surgical decompression, one of the primary goals of a fusion procedure is to achieve a solid arthrodesis. Assuming that pain and disability result from lost mechanical integrity of the spine, the objective of a fusion across an unstable segment is to eliminate pathological motion and improve clinical outcome. However, conclusive evidence of this correlation, between successful fusion and clinical outcome, remains elusive, and thus the necessity of documenting successful arthrodesis through radiographic analysis remains debatable. Although a definitive cause and effect relationship has not been demonstrated, there is moderate evidence that demonstrates a positive association between radiographic presence of fusion and improved clinical outcome. Due to this growing body of literature, it is recommended that strategies intended to enhance the potential for radiographic fusion are considered when performing a lumbar arthrodesis for degenerative spine disease.",
keywords = "Fusion, Lumbar spine, Practice guidelines, Treatment outcomes",
author = "Dhall, {Sanjay S.} and Choudhri, {Tanvir F.} and Eck, {Jason C.} and Groff, {Michael W.} and Zoher Ghogawala and Watters, {William C.} and Dailey, {Andrew T.} and Resnick, {Daniel K.} and Alok Sharan and Mummaneni, {Praveen V.} and Wang, {Jeffrey C.} and Kaiser, {Michael G.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14268",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "31--36",
journal = "Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine",
issn = "1547-5654",
publisher = "American Association of Neurological Surgeons",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 5

T2 - Correlation between radiographic outcome and function

AU - Dhall, Sanjay S.

AU - Choudhri, Tanvir F.

AU - Eck, Jason C.

AU - Groff, Michael W.

AU - Ghogawala, Zoher

AU - Watters, William C.

AU - Dailey, Andrew T.

AU - Resnick, Daniel K.

AU - Sharan, Alok

AU - Mummaneni, Praveen V.

AU - Wang, Jeffrey C.

AU - Kaiser, Michael G.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - In an effort to diminish pain or progressive instability, due to either the pathological process or as a result of surgical decompression, one of the primary goals of a fusion procedure is to achieve a solid arthrodesis. Assuming that pain and disability result from lost mechanical integrity of the spine, the objective of a fusion across an unstable segment is to eliminate pathological motion and improve clinical outcome. However, conclusive evidence of this correlation, between successful fusion and clinical outcome, remains elusive, and thus the necessity of documenting successful arthrodesis through radiographic analysis remains debatable. Although a definitive cause and effect relationship has not been demonstrated, there is moderate evidence that demonstrates a positive association between radiographic presence of fusion and improved clinical outcome. Due to this growing body of literature, it is recommended that strategies intended to enhance the potential for radiographic fusion are considered when performing a lumbar arthrodesis for degenerative spine disease.

AB - In an effort to diminish pain or progressive instability, due to either the pathological process or as a result of surgical decompression, one of the primary goals of a fusion procedure is to achieve a solid arthrodesis. Assuming that pain and disability result from lost mechanical integrity of the spine, the objective of a fusion across an unstable segment is to eliminate pathological motion and improve clinical outcome. However, conclusive evidence of this correlation, between successful fusion and clinical outcome, remains elusive, and thus the necessity of documenting successful arthrodesis through radiographic analysis remains debatable. Although a definitive cause and effect relationship has not been demonstrated, there is moderate evidence that demonstrates a positive association between radiographic presence of fusion and improved clinical outcome. Due to this growing body of literature, it is recommended that strategies intended to enhance the potential for radiographic fusion are considered when performing a lumbar arthrodesis for degenerative spine disease.

KW - Fusion

KW - Lumbar spine

KW - Practice guidelines

KW - Treatment outcomes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903896526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84903896526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14268

DO - 10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14268

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 31

EP - 36

JO - Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

JF - Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

SN - 1547-5654

IS - 1

ER -