Grouping of Sequential Sounds - An Event-Related Potential Study Comparing Musicians and Nonmusicians

Titia L. Van Zuijen, Elyse S. Sussman, István Winkler, Risto Näätänen, Mari Tervaniemi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

88 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is believed that auditory processes governing grouping and segmentation of sounds are automatic and represent universal aspects of music perception (e.g., they are independent of the listener's musical skill). The present study challenges this view by showing that musicians and nonmusicians differ in their ability to preattentively group consecutive sounds. We measured event-related potentials (ERPs) from professional musicians and nonmusicians who were presented with isochronous tone sequences that they ignored. Four consecutive tones in a sequence could be grouped according to either pitch similarity or good continuation of pitch. Occasionally, the tone-group length was violated by a deviant tone. The mismatch negativity (MMN) was elicited to the deviants in both subject groups when the sounds could be grouped based on pitch similarity. In contrast, MMN was only elicited in musicians when the sounds could be grouped according to good continuation of pitch. These results suggest that some forms of auditory grouping depend on musical skill and that not all aspects of auditory grouping are universal.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)331-338
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2004

Fingerprint

Evoked Potentials
Aptitude
Music

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Grouping of Sequential Sounds - An Event-Related Potential Study Comparing Musicians and Nonmusicians. / Van Zuijen, Titia L.; Sussman, Elyse S.; Winkler, István; Näätänen, Risto; Tervaniemi, Mari.

In: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Vol. 16, No. 2, 03.2004, p. 331-338.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Van Zuijen, Titia L. ; Sussman, Elyse S. ; Winkler, István ; Näätänen, Risto ; Tervaniemi, Mari. / Grouping of Sequential Sounds - An Event-Related Potential Study Comparing Musicians and Nonmusicians. In: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2004 ; Vol. 16, No. 2. pp. 331-338.
@article{d9feb3c4fce34743808411f14108b6d8,
title = "Grouping of Sequential Sounds - An Event-Related Potential Study Comparing Musicians and Nonmusicians",
abstract = "It is believed that auditory processes governing grouping and segmentation of sounds are automatic and represent universal aspects of music perception (e.g., they are independent of the listener's musical skill). The present study challenges this view by showing that musicians and nonmusicians differ in their ability to preattentively group consecutive sounds. We measured event-related potentials (ERPs) from professional musicians and nonmusicians who were presented with isochronous tone sequences that they ignored. Four consecutive tones in a sequence could be grouped according to either pitch similarity or good continuation of pitch. Occasionally, the tone-group length was violated by a deviant tone. The mismatch negativity (MMN) was elicited to the deviants in both subject groups when the sounds could be grouped based on pitch similarity. In contrast, MMN was only elicited in musicians when the sounds could be grouped according to good continuation of pitch. These results suggest that some forms of auditory grouping depend on musical skill and that not all aspects of auditory grouping are universal.",
author = "{Van Zuijen}, {Titia L.} and Sussman, {Elyse S.} and Istv{\'a}n Winkler and Risto N{\"a}{\"a}t{\"a}nen and Mari Tervaniemi",
year = "2004",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1162/089892904322984607",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "331--338",
journal = "Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience",
issn = "0898-929X",
publisher = "MIT Press Journals",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Grouping of Sequential Sounds - An Event-Related Potential Study Comparing Musicians and Nonmusicians

AU - Van Zuijen, Titia L.

AU - Sussman, Elyse S.

AU - Winkler, István

AU - Näätänen, Risto

AU - Tervaniemi, Mari

PY - 2004/3

Y1 - 2004/3

N2 - It is believed that auditory processes governing grouping and segmentation of sounds are automatic and represent universal aspects of music perception (e.g., they are independent of the listener's musical skill). The present study challenges this view by showing that musicians and nonmusicians differ in their ability to preattentively group consecutive sounds. We measured event-related potentials (ERPs) from professional musicians and nonmusicians who were presented with isochronous tone sequences that they ignored. Four consecutive tones in a sequence could be grouped according to either pitch similarity or good continuation of pitch. Occasionally, the tone-group length was violated by a deviant tone. The mismatch negativity (MMN) was elicited to the deviants in both subject groups when the sounds could be grouped based on pitch similarity. In contrast, MMN was only elicited in musicians when the sounds could be grouped according to good continuation of pitch. These results suggest that some forms of auditory grouping depend on musical skill and that not all aspects of auditory grouping are universal.

AB - It is believed that auditory processes governing grouping and segmentation of sounds are automatic and represent universal aspects of music perception (e.g., they are independent of the listener's musical skill). The present study challenges this view by showing that musicians and nonmusicians differ in their ability to preattentively group consecutive sounds. We measured event-related potentials (ERPs) from professional musicians and nonmusicians who were presented with isochronous tone sequences that they ignored. Four consecutive tones in a sequence could be grouped according to either pitch similarity or good continuation of pitch. Occasionally, the tone-group length was violated by a deviant tone. The mismatch negativity (MMN) was elicited to the deviants in both subject groups when the sounds could be grouped based on pitch similarity. In contrast, MMN was only elicited in musicians when the sounds could be grouped according to good continuation of pitch. These results suggest that some forms of auditory grouping depend on musical skill and that not all aspects of auditory grouping are universal.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1542344466&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1542344466&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1162/089892904322984607

DO - 10.1162/089892904322984607

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 331

EP - 338

JO - Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

SN - 0898-929X

IS - 2

ER -