TY - JOUR
T1 - Future perspectives in melanoma research
T2 - Meeting report from the "Melanoma Bridge", Napoli, December 5th-8th 2013
AU - Ascierto, Paolo A.
AU - Grimaldi, Antonio M.
AU - Anderson, Ana Carrizosa
AU - Bifulco, Carlo
AU - Cochran, Alistair
AU - Garbe, Claus
AU - Eggermont, Alexander M.
AU - Faries, Mark
AU - Ferrone, Soldano
AU - Gershenwald, Jeffrey E.
AU - Gajewski, Thomas F.
AU - Halaban, Ruth
AU - Stephen Hodi, F.
AU - Kefford, Richard
AU - Kirkwood, John M.
AU - Larkin, James
AU - Leachman, Sancy
AU - Maio, Michele
AU - Marais, Richard
AU - Masucci, Giuseppe
AU - Melero, Ignacio
AU - Palmieri, Giuseppe
AU - Puzanov, Igor
AU - Ribas, Antoni
AU - Saenger, Yvonne
AU - Schilling, Bastian
AU - Seliger, Barbara
AU - Stroncek, David
AU - Sullivan, Ryan
AU - Testori, Alessandro
AU - Wang, Ena
AU - Ciliberto, Gennaro
AU - Mozzillo, Nicola
AU - Marincola, Francesco M.
AU - Thurin, Magdalena
N1 - Funding Information:
PAA has/had consultant and advisory role for Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche-Genenetech, Glaxo Smith-Kline, Amgen, Ventana Medical Systems, Inc, and Novartis. He received research fund from Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche-Genetech, and Ventana. He received honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche-Genenetech, Glaxo Smith-Kline. AMG has no competing interest. ACA was a paid member of the scientific advisory board for CoStim Pharmaceuticals which was acquired by Novartis. CB is a consultant/ advisory board member of EMD/Serono Inc. AC has no competing interest. CG reports personal fees from Amgen, grants and personal fees from BMS, grants and personal fees from GSK, personal fees from MSD, personal fees from Novartis, grants and personal fees from Roche, and personal fees from Philogen. AME scientific advisory board honoraria from Amgen, BMS, GSK, MedImmune; Merck. MF Consulting: Amgen, Genentech. Advisory Board: Astellas Pharma. SF has no competing interest. TG advisory boards: Roche-Genentech, Merck, Abbvie, Bayer, Flexus. Co-founder: Jounce. Research support: GSK-Bio, Roche-Genentech, BMS, Incyte, Merck, Ono. JEG Merck – Global Advisory Board. RH has no competing interest. FSH non paid consultant and institution received research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Genentech. RK received Institutional reimbursement for Advisory Boards: Roche, GSK, Merck, BMS, Novartis, and Institutional reimbursement for travel: BMS, Merck. JMK is advisory board consultant for Merck, BMS, GSK, and had funds for research from Prometheus. JL received research funding from Pfizer and Novartis. He is consultant (non-remunerated since 2012) for BMS, GSK, Pfizer, Novartis. SL is a consultant/advisory board member of Myriad Genetics, Inc. MM served as advisor to Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche-Genentech, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Merck Serono, GlaxoSmithKline and Amgen; received research funds from Bristol-Myers Squibb. RM has no competing interest. GM has no competing interest. IM has no competing interest. GP has no competing interest IP is consultant for Amgen and Roche. AR has/had consultant and advisory role for Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche-Genentech, Glaxo Smith-Kline, Amgen, MedImmune-Astra Zeneca and Novartis, with the honoraria paid to UCLA. He is a stockholder at Kite Pharma. YS received honoraria for advisory boards for Amgen. BS Roche: Honoraria, BMS: Travel support. BSE has no competing interest. DS has no competing interest. RS has no competing interest. AT has/had a consultant/advisory role for BMS, Roche, GSK, Amgen, Celgene. He received also honoraria from BMS. EW has no competing interest. GC has no competing interest. NM has no competing interest. FMM has no competing interest. MT has no competing interest.
Funding Information:
Acknowledgement The meeting was supported by Fondazione Melanoma Onlus and the Society of ImmunoTherapy of Cancer (SITC). A special thanks to 3P Solution of Napoli for their support and cooperation in organizing the meeting and to Michael Hoetzel for providing us with the group picture from the meeting.
Funding Information:
The meeting was supported by Fondazione Melanoma Onlus and the Society of ImmunoTherapy of Cancer (SITC). A special thanks to 3P Solution of Napoli for their support and cooperation in organizing the meeting and to Michael Hoetzel for providing us with the group picture from the meeting.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Ascierto et al.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - The fourth "Melanoma Bridge Meeting" took place in Naples, December 5 to 8th, 2013. The four topics discussed at this meeting were: Diagnosis and New Procedures, Molecular Advances and Combination Therapies, News in Immunotherapy, and Tumor Microenvironment and Biomarkers. Until recently systemic therapy for metastatic melanoma patients was ineffective, but recent research in tumor biology and immunology has led to the development of new targeted and immunotherapeutic agents that prolong progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). New therapies, such as mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway inhibitors, like BRAF and MEK inhibitors, as well as other signaling pathways inhibitors, are being tested in metastatic melanoma either as monotherapy or in combination, and have yielded promising results. Improved survival rates have also been observed with immune therapy for patients with metastatic melanoma. Immune-modulating antibodies came to the forefront with anti-CTLA-4, programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway blocking antibodies that result in durable responses in a subset of melanoma patients. Agents targeting other immune inhibitory (e.g., Tim-3) or immune stimulating (e.g., CD137) receptors and other approaches such as adoptive cell transfer demonstrate clinical benefit in melanoma as well. This meeting's specific focus was on advances in targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Both combination targeted therapy approaches and different immunotherapies were discussed. Similarly to the previous meetings, the importance of biomarkers for clinical application as markers for diagnosis, prognosis and prediction of treatment response was an integral part of the meeting. Significant consideration was given to issues surrounding the development of novel therapeutic targets as further study of patterns of resistance to both immunologic and targeted drugs are paramount to future drug development to guide existing and future therapies. The overall emphasis on biomarkers supports novel concepts toward integrating biomarkers into contemporary clinical management of patients with melanoma across the entire spectrum of disease stage. Translation of the knowledge gained from the biology of tumor microenvironment across different tumors represents a bridge to impact on prognosis and response to therapy in melanoma.
AB - The fourth "Melanoma Bridge Meeting" took place in Naples, December 5 to 8th, 2013. The four topics discussed at this meeting were: Diagnosis and New Procedures, Molecular Advances and Combination Therapies, News in Immunotherapy, and Tumor Microenvironment and Biomarkers. Until recently systemic therapy for metastatic melanoma patients was ineffective, but recent research in tumor biology and immunology has led to the development of new targeted and immunotherapeutic agents that prolong progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). New therapies, such as mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway inhibitors, like BRAF and MEK inhibitors, as well as other signaling pathways inhibitors, are being tested in metastatic melanoma either as monotherapy or in combination, and have yielded promising results. Improved survival rates have also been observed with immune therapy for patients with metastatic melanoma. Immune-modulating antibodies came to the forefront with anti-CTLA-4, programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway blocking antibodies that result in durable responses in a subset of melanoma patients. Agents targeting other immune inhibitory (e.g., Tim-3) or immune stimulating (e.g., CD137) receptors and other approaches such as adoptive cell transfer demonstrate clinical benefit in melanoma as well. This meeting's specific focus was on advances in targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Both combination targeted therapy approaches and different immunotherapies were discussed. Similarly to the previous meetings, the importance of biomarkers for clinical application as markers for diagnosis, prognosis and prediction of treatment response was an integral part of the meeting. Significant consideration was given to issues surrounding the development of novel therapeutic targets as further study of patterns of resistance to both immunologic and targeted drugs are paramount to future drug development to guide existing and future therapies. The overall emphasis on biomarkers supports novel concepts toward integrating biomarkers into contemporary clinical management of patients with melanoma across the entire spectrum of disease stage. Translation of the knowledge gained from the biology of tumor microenvironment across different tumors represents a bridge to impact on prognosis and response to therapy in melanoma.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988660611&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84988660611&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12967-014-0277-z
DO - 10.1186/s12967-014-0277-z
M3 - Article
C2 - 25348889
AN - SCOPUS:84988660611
VL - 12
JO - Journal of Translational Medicine
JF - Journal of Translational Medicine
SN - 1479-5876
IS - 1
M1 - 277
ER -