Future of the TNM classification and staging system in head and neck cancer

Robert P. Takes, Alessandra Rinaldo, Carl E. Silver, Jay F. Piccirillo, Missak Haigentz, Carlos Suárez, Vincent Van Der Poorten, Robert Hermans, Juan Pablo Rodrigo, Kenneth O. Devaney, Alfio Ferlito

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Staging systems for cancer, including the most universally used TNM classification system, have been based almost exclusively on anatomic information. However, the question arises whether staging systems should be based on this information alone. Other parameters have been identified that should be considered for inclusion in classification systems like the TNM. This is all the more important, as a shift toward nonsurgical treatments for head and neck cancer has been made over the years. For these treatment modalities tumor/biologic characteristics next to anatomic information may be particularly important for treatment choice and outcome. The shortcomings of the current TNM classification system will be discussed, along with suggestions for improvement and expansion of the TNM system based on tumor, patient, and environment-related factors. Further improvement of the TNM classification is expected to result in better treatment choices, outcome and prognostication of patients with head and neck cancer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1693-1711
Number of pages19
JournalHead and Neck
Volume32
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2010

Fingerprint

Neoplasm Staging
Head and Neck Neoplasms
Biological Products
Neoplasms
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • classification
  • head and neck cancer
  • prognostic factors
  • staging
  • TNM

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Takes, R. P., Rinaldo, A., Silver, C. E., Piccirillo, J. F., Haigentz, M., Suárez, C., ... Ferlito, A. (2010). Future of the TNM classification and staging system in head and neck cancer. Head and Neck, 32(12), 1693-1711. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.21361

Future of the TNM classification and staging system in head and neck cancer. / Takes, Robert P.; Rinaldo, Alessandra; Silver, Carl E.; Piccirillo, Jay F.; Haigentz, Missak; Suárez, Carlos; Van Der Poorten, Vincent; Hermans, Robert; Rodrigo, Juan Pablo; Devaney, Kenneth O.; Ferlito, Alfio.

In: Head and Neck, Vol. 32, No. 12, 12.2010, p. 1693-1711.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Takes, RP, Rinaldo, A, Silver, CE, Piccirillo, JF, Haigentz, M, Suárez, C, Van Der Poorten, V, Hermans, R, Rodrigo, JP, Devaney, KO & Ferlito, A 2010, 'Future of the TNM classification and staging system in head and neck cancer', Head and Neck, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 1693-1711. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.21361
Takes RP, Rinaldo A, Silver CE, Piccirillo JF, Haigentz M, Suárez C et al. Future of the TNM classification and staging system in head and neck cancer. Head and Neck. 2010 Dec;32(12):1693-1711. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.21361
Takes, Robert P. ; Rinaldo, Alessandra ; Silver, Carl E. ; Piccirillo, Jay F. ; Haigentz, Missak ; Suárez, Carlos ; Van Der Poorten, Vincent ; Hermans, Robert ; Rodrigo, Juan Pablo ; Devaney, Kenneth O. ; Ferlito, Alfio. / Future of the TNM classification and staging system in head and neck cancer. In: Head and Neck. 2010 ; Vol. 32, No. 12. pp. 1693-1711.
@article{ed5d357905d84904b0bb8b2ada360ad1,
title = "Future of the TNM classification and staging system in head and neck cancer",
abstract = "Staging systems for cancer, including the most universally used TNM classification system, have been based almost exclusively on anatomic information. However, the question arises whether staging systems should be based on this information alone. Other parameters have been identified that should be considered for inclusion in classification systems like the TNM. This is all the more important, as a shift toward nonsurgical treatments for head and neck cancer has been made over the years. For these treatment modalities tumor/biologic characteristics next to anatomic information may be particularly important for treatment choice and outcome. The shortcomings of the current TNM classification system will be discussed, along with suggestions for improvement and expansion of the TNM system based on tumor, patient, and environment-related factors. Further improvement of the TNM classification is expected to result in better treatment choices, outcome and prognostication of patients with head and neck cancer.",
keywords = "classification, head and neck cancer, prognostic factors, staging, TNM",
author = "Takes, {Robert P.} and Alessandra Rinaldo and Silver, {Carl E.} and Piccirillo, {Jay F.} and Missak Haigentz and Carlos Su{\'a}rez and {Van Der Poorten}, Vincent and Robert Hermans and Rodrigo, {Juan Pablo} and Devaney, {Kenneth O.} and Alfio Ferlito",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1002/hed.21361",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "1693--1711",
journal = "Head and Neck",
issn = "1043-3074",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Future of the TNM classification and staging system in head and neck cancer

AU - Takes, Robert P.

AU - Rinaldo, Alessandra

AU - Silver, Carl E.

AU - Piccirillo, Jay F.

AU - Haigentz, Missak

AU - Suárez, Carlos

AU - Van Der Poorten, Vincent

AU - Hermans, Robert

AU - Rodrigo, Juan Pablo

AU - Devaney, Kenneth O.

AU - Ferlito, Alfio

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - Staging systems for cancer, including the most universally used TNM classification system, have been based almost exclusively on anatomic information. However, the question arises whether staging systems should be based on this information alone. Other parameters have been identified that should be considered for inclusion in classification systems like the TNM. This is all the more important, as a shift toward nonsurgical treatments for head and neck cancer has been made over the years. For these treatment modalities tumor/biologic characteristics next to anatomic information may be particularly important for treatment choice and outcome. The shortcomings of the current TNM classification system will be discussed, along with suggestions for improvement and expansion of the TNM system based on tumor, patient, and environment-related factors. Further improvement of the TNM classification is expected to result in better treatment choices, outcome and prognostication of patients with head and neck cancer.

AB - Staging systems for cancer, including the most universally used TNM classification system, have been based almost exclusively on anatomic information. However, the question arises whether staging systems should be based on this information alone. Other parameters have been identified that should be considered for inclusion in classification systems like the TNM. This is all the more important, as a shift toward nonsurgical treatments for head and neck cancer has been made over the years. For these treatment modalities tumor/biologic characteristics next to anatomic information may be particularly important for treatment choice and outcome. The shortcomings of the current TNM classification system will be discussed, along with suggestions for improvement and expansion of the TNM system based on tumor, patient, and environment-related factors. Further improvement of the TNM classification is expected to result in better treatment choices, outcome and prognostication of patients with head and neck cancer.

KW - classification

KW - head and neck cancer

KW - prognostic factors

KW - staging

KW - TNM

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955115277&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955115277&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/hed.21361

DO - 10.1002/hed.21361

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 1693

EP - 1711

JO - Head and Neck

JF - Head and Neck

SN - 1043-3074

IS - 12

ER -