Abstract
Conclusion: The authorship has two stakeholders or sides simply. Unless quantity dominating promotion process rather than quality improves, no legislation or law could prevent the exertion for being listed in the byline and the order of authorship will continue to be an obstacle. Local authorized organizations such universities, educational councils, and national professional associations should initiate a task force and create an agreement on the order of authorship. Meanwhile, compulsory requirement of contributorship explanation by journals would definitely help to clarify ambiguity and dissipate the disagreements.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 38-39 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Meme Sagligi Dergisi / Journal of Breast Health |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| State | Published - Jul 27 2010 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Guideline
- Order of authorship
- Publication
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Internal Medicine
- Oncology
Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Frailty in publication: Order of authorship'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Cite this
Soran, A., & Andacoglu, O. (2010). Frailty in publication: Order of authorship. Meme Sagligi Dergisi / Journal of Breast Health, 6(1), 38-39.