Forty-One Million RADPEER Reviews Later: What We Have Learned and Are Still Learning

Humaira Chaudhry, Andrew J. Del Gaizo, L. Alexandre Frigini, Shlomit Goldberg-Stein, Scott D. Long, Zeyad A. Metwalli, Jonathan A. Morgan, Xuan V. Nguyen, Mark S. Parker, Hani Abujudeh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

ACR RADPEER® is the leading method of radiologic peer review in the United States. The program has evolved since its inception in 2002 and was most recently updated in 2016. In 2018, a survey was sent to RADPEER participants to gauge the current state of the program and explore opportunities for continued improvement. A total of 26 questions were included, and more than 300 practices responded. In this report, the ACR RADPEER Committee authors summarize the survey results and discuss opportunities for future iterations of the RADPEER program.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)779-785
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American College of Radiology
Volume17
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2020

Keywords

  • RADPEER
  • diagnostic radiology
  • peer review
  • quality improvement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Forty-One Million RADPEER Reviews Later: What We Have Learned and Are Still Learning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this