TY - JOUR
T1 - Flow cytometry analysis of gap junction-mediated Cel-Cell communication
T2 - Advantages and pitfalls
AU - Fonseca, Paula Candida
AU - Nihei, Oscar Kenji
AU - Savino, Wilson
AU - Spray, David C.
AU - Alves, Luiz Anastacio
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2006/6
Y1 - 2006/6
N2 - Background: Since the first morphological description of the gap junctions use electron microscopy, a considerable number of techniques has been introduced to evaluate gap junction channel functionality, many of which use dye transfer techniques, such as dye injection and fluorescent dye transfer, analyzed by flow cytometry. Methods: To analyze dye transfer, generally one population of cells is incubated with calcein-AM (0.5 μM) for 30 min at 37°C, and the other population was incubated with the lipophilic dye DiIC18 (3) (10 μM) for 1h at 37°C; after incubation, these cells were washed five times with PBS and cocultured for different times, and then the dye transfer was analyzed by flow cytometry. Results: In this short overview, we focus on some advantages and disadvantages of flow cytometry as a technique to investigate gap junction-mediated intercellular communication (GJIC). In addition, we point out some technical pitfalls that we have encountered when applying this technique to study gap junctions in immune system cells. Conclusions: Analysis of fluorescent dye transfer by flow cytometry is a useful tool to investigate GJIC. However, some points must be taken into consideration before using this methodology, which are discussed herein.
AB - Background: Since the first morphological description of the gap junctions use electron microscopy, a considerable number of techniques has been introduced to evaluate gap junction channel functionality, many of which use dye transfer techniques, such as dye injection and fluorescent dye transfer, analyzed by flow cytometry. Methods: To analyze dye transfer, generally one population of cells is incubated with calcein-AM (0.5 μM) for 30 min at 37°C, and the other population was incubated with the lipophilic dye DiIC18 (3) (10 μM) for 1h at 37°C; after incubation, these cells were washed five times with PBS and cocultured for different times, and then the dye transfer was analyzed by flow cytometry. Results: In this short overview, we focus on some advantages and disadvantages of flow cytometry as a technique to investigate gap junction-mediated intercellular communication (GJIC). In addition, we point out some technical pitfalls that we have encountered when applying this technique to study gap junctions in immune system cells. Conclusions: Analysis of fluorescent dye transfer by flow cytometry is a useful tool to investigate GJIC. However, some points must be taken into consideration before using this methodology, which are discussed herein.
KW - Flow cytometry
KW - Gap junctions
KW - Intercellular communication
KW - Lymphocytes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047697917&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047697917&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/cyto.a.20255
DO - 10.1002/cyto.a.20255
M3 - Review article
C2 - 16646046
AN - SCOPUS:85047697917
SN - 1552-4922
VL - 69
SP - 487
EP - 493
JO - Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology
JF - Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology
IS - 6
ER -