Family medicine research in the united states: From the late 1960s into the future

Marjorie A. Bowman, Sean C. Lucan, Thomas C. Rosenthal, Arch G. Mainous, Paul A. James

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: When the new field of family medicine research began a half century ago, multiple individuals and organizations emphasized that research was a key mission. Since the field’s inception, there have been notable research successes for which family medicine organizations, researchers, and leaders assisted by federal and state governments and private foundations can take credit. Research is a requirement for family medicine residency programs but not individual residents, and multiple family medicine departments offer research training in various forms for learners at all levels, including research fellowships. Family physicians have developed practicebased research networks (PBRNs) to conduct investigations and generate new knowledge. The field of family medicine has seen the creation of new journals to support the publication of research relevant to practicing family physicians. Nonetheless, in spite of much growth and many successes, family physicians and their research have been underrepresented in research funding. Clinical presentations in family medicine are often complex, poorlydifferentiated, and exist as one of several patient complaints and diagnoses, and are not well-covered by the narrow basic-science and specialty research that defines most of the biomedical research enterprise. Overall health in the United States would benefit from a more robust research participation and greater support for family medicine research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)289-295
Number of pages7
JournalFamily Medicine
Volume49
Issue number4
StatePublished - Apr 1 2017

Fingerprint

Medicine
Research
Family Physicians
Organizations
State Government
Federal Government
Internship and Residency
Publications
Biomedical Research
Research Personnel
Health
Growth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice

Cite this

Bowman, M. A., Lucan, S. C., Rosenthal, T. C., Mainous, A. G., & James, P. A. (2017). Family medicine research in the united states: From the late 1960s into the future. Family Medicine, 49(4), 289-295.

Family medicine research in the united states : From the late 1960s into the future. / Bowman, Marjorie A.; Lucan, Sean C.; Rosenthal, Thomas C.; Mainous, Arch G.; James, Paul A.

In: Family Medicine, Vol. 49, No. 4, 01.04.2017, p. 289-295.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bowman, MA, Lucan, SC, Rosenthal, TC, Mainous, AG & James, PA 2017, 'Family medicine research in the united states: From the late 1960s into the future', Family Medicine, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 289-295.
Bowman MA, Lucan SC, Rosenthal TC, Mainous AG, James PA. Family medicine research in the united states: From the late 1960s into the future. Family Medicine. 2017 Apr 1;49(4):289-295.
Bowman, Marjorie A. ; Lucan, Sean C. ; Rosenthal, Thomas C. ; Mainous, Arch G. ; James, Paul A. / Family medicine research in the united states : From the late 1960s into the future. In: Family Medicine. 2017 ; Vol. 49, No. 4. pp. 289-295.
@article{c05671306f834d7982aa5ebc8d01a2f0,
title = "Family medicine research in the united states: From the late 1960s into the future",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: When the new field of family medicine research began a half century ago, multiple individuals and organizations emphasized that research was a key mission. Since the field’s inception, there have been notable research successes for which family medicine organizations, researchers, and leaders assisted by federal and state governments and private foundations can take credit. Research is a requirement for family medicine residency programs but not individual residents, and multiple family medicine departments offer research training in various forms for learners at all levels, including research fellowships. Family physicians have developed practicebased research networks (PBRNs) to conduct investigations and generate new knowledge. The field of family medicine has seen the creation of new journals to support the publication of research relevant to practicing family physicians. Nonetheless, in spite of much growth and many successes, family physicians and their research have been underrepresented in research funding. Clinical presentations in family medicine are often complex, poorlydifferentiated, and exist as one of several patient complaints and diagnoses, and are not well-covered by the narrow basic-science and specialty research that defines most of the biomedical research enterprise. Overall health in the United States would benefit from a more robust research participation and greater support for family medicine research.",
author = "Bowman, {Marjorie A.} and Lucan, {Sean C.} and Rosenthal, {Thomas C.} and Mainous, {Arch G.} and James, {Paul A.}",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "289--295",
journal = "Family Medicine",
issn = "0742-3225",
publisher = "Society of Teachers of Family Medicine",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Family medicine research in the united states

T2 - From the late 1960s into the future

AU - Bowman, Marjorie A.

AU - Lucan, Sean C.

AU - Rosenthal, Thomas C.

AU - Mainous, Arch G.

AU - James, Paul A.

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: When the new field of family medicine research began a half century ago, multiple individuals and organizations emphasized that research was a key mission. Since the field’s inception, there have been notable research successes for which family medicine organizations, researchers, and leaders assisted by federal and state governments and private foundations can take credit. Research is a requirement for family medicine residency programs but not individual residents, and multiple family medicine departments offer research training in various forms for learners at all levels, including research fellowships. Family physicians have developed practicebased research networks (PBRNs) to conduct investigations and generate new knowledge. The field of family medicine has seen the creation of new journals to support the publication of research relevant to practicing family physicians. Nonetheless, in spite of much growth and many successes, family physicians and their research have been underrepresented in research funding. Clinical presentations in family medicine are often complex, poorlydifferentiated, and exist as one of several patient complaints and diagnoses, and are not well-covered by the narrow basic-science and specialty research that defines most of the biomedical research enterprise. Overall health in the United States would benefit from a more robust research participation and greater support for family medicine research.

AB - BACKGROUND: When the new field of family medicine research began a half century ago, multiple individuals and organizations emphasized that research was a key mission. Since the field’s inception, there have been notable research successes for which family medicine organizations, researchers, and leaders assisted by federal and state governments and private foundations can take credit. Research is a requirement for family medicine residency programs but not individual residents, and multiple family medicine departments offer research training in various forms for learners at all levels, including research fellowships. Family physicians have developed practicebased research networks (PBRNs) to conduct investigations and generate new knowledge. The field of family medicine has seen the creation of new journals to support the publication of research relevant to practicing family physicians. Nonetheless, in spite of much growth and many successes, family physicians and their research have been underrepresented in research funding. Clinical presentations in family medicine are often complex, poorlydifferentiated, and exist as one of several patient complaints and diagnoses, and are not well-covered by the narrow basic-science and specialty research that defines most of the biomedical research enterprise. Overall health in the United States would benefit from a more robust research participation and greater support for family medicine research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017300280&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017300280&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 28414408

AN - SCOPUS:85017300280

VL - 49

SP - 289

EP - 295

JO - Family Medicine

JF - Family Medicine

SN - 0742-3225

IS - 4

ER -