Factors related to clinical quality improvement for small practices using an ehr

Jason J. Wang, Jisung Cha, Kimberly M. Sebek, Colleen M. McCullough, Amanda S. Parsons, Jesse Singer, Sarah C. Shih

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To analyze the impact of three primary care practice transformation program models on performance: Meaningful Use (MU), Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH), and a pay-for-performance program (eHearts). Data Sources/Study Setting Data for seven quality measures (QM) were retrospectively collected from 192 small primary care practices between October 2009 and October 2012; practice demographics and program participation status were extracted from in-house data. Study Design Bivariate analyses were conducted to measure the impact of individual programs, and a Generalized Estimating Equation model was built to test the impact of each program alongside the others. Data Collection/Extraction Methods Monthly data were extracted via a structured query data network and were compared to program participation status, adjusting for variables including practice size and patient volume. Seven QMs were analyzed related to smoking prevention, blood pressure control, BMI, diabetes, and antithrombotic therapy. Principal Findings In bivariate analysis, MU practices tended to perform better on process measures, PCMH practices on more complex process measures, and eHearts practices on measures for which they were incentivized; in multivariate analysis, PCMH recognition was associated with better performance on more QMs than any other program. Conclusions Results suggest each of the programs can positively impact performance. In our data, PCMH appears to have the most positive impact.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1729-1746
Number of pages18
JournalHealth Services Research
Volume49
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2014

Fingerprint

Quality Improvement
Patient-Centered Care
Process Assessment (Health Care)
Primary Health Care
Incentive Reimbursement
Information Storage and Retrieval
Multivariate Analysis
Smoking
Demography
Blood Pressure
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • meaningful use
  • pay-for-performance
  • PCMH
  • primary care
  • Quality measurement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Wang, J. J., Cha, J., Sebek, K. M., McCullough, C. M., Parsons, A. S., Singer, J., & Shih, S. C. (2014). Factors related to clinical quality improvement for small practices using an ehr. Health Services Research, 49(6), 1729-1746. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12243

Factors related to clinical quality improvement for small practices using an ehr. / Wang, Jason J.; Cha, Jisung; Sebek, Kimberly M.; McCullough, Colleen M.; Parsons, Amanda S.; Singer, Jesse; Shih, Sarah C.

In: Health Services Research, Vol. 49, No. 6, 01.12.2014, p. 1729-1746.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wang, JJ, Cha, J, Sebek, KM, McCullough, CM, Parsons, AS, Singer, J & Shih, SC 2014, 'Factors related to clinical quality improvement for small practices using an ehr', Health Services Research, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 1729-1746. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12243
Wang, Jason J. ; Cha, Jisung ; Sebek, Kimberly M. ; McCullough, Colleen M. ; Parsons, Amanda S. ; Singer, Jesse ; Shih, Sarah C. / Factors related to clinical quality improvement for small practices using an ehr. In: Health Services Research. 2014 ; Vol. 49, No. 6. pp. 1729-1746.
@article{f75ed55983484fbeae057cdceac678cb,
title = "Factors related to clinical quality improvement for small practices using an ehr",
abstract = "Objective To analyze the impact of three primary care practice transformation program models on performance: Meaningful Use (MU), Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH), and a pay-for-performance program (eHearts). Data Sources/Study Setting Data for seven quality measures (QM) were retrospectively collected from 192 small primary care practices between October 2009 and October 2012; practice demographics and program participation status were extracted from in-house data. Study Design Bivariate analyses were conducted to measure the impact of individual programs, and a Generalized Estimating Equation model was built to test the impact of each program alongside the others. Data Collection/Extraction Methods Monthly data were extracted via a structured query data network and were compared to program participation status, adjusting for variables including practice size and patient volume. Seven QMs were analyzed related to smoking prevention, blood pressure control, BMI, diabetes, and antithrombotic therapy. Principal Findings In bivariate analysis, MU practices tended to perform better on process measures, PCMH practices on more complex process measures, and eHearts practices on measures for which they were incentivized; in multivariate analysis, PCMH recognition was associated with better performance on more QMs than any other program. Conclusions Results suggest each of the programs can positively impact performance. In our data, PCMH appears to have the most positive impact.",
keywords = "meaningful use, pay-for-performance, PCMH, primary care, Quality measurement",
author = "Wang, {Jason J.} and Jisung Cha and Sebek, {Kimberly M.} and McCullough, {Colleen M.} and Parsons, {Amanda S.} and Jesse Singer and Shih, {Sarah C.}",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1475-6773.12243",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "1729--1746",
journal = "Health Services Research",
issn = "0017-9124",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors related to clinical quality improvement for small practices using an ehr

AU - Wang, Jason J.

AU - Cha, Jisung

AU - Sebek, Kimberly M.

AU - McCullough, Colleen M.

AU - Parsons, Amanda S.

AU - Singer, Jesse

AU - Shih, Sarah C.

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - Objective To analyze the impact of three primary care practice transformation program models on performance: Meaningful Use (MU), Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH), and a pay-for-performance program (eHearts). Data Sources/Study Setting Data for seven quality measures (QM) were retrospectively collected from 192 small primary care practices between October 2009 and October 2012; practice demographics and program participation status were extracted from in-house data. Study Design Bivariate analyses were conducted to measure the impact of individual programs, and a Generalized Estimating Equation model was built to test the impact of each program alongside the others. Data Collection/Extraction Methods Monthly data were extracted via a structured query data network and were compared to program participation status, adjusting for variables including practice size and patient volume. Seven QMs were analyzed related to smoking prevention, blood pressure control, BMI, diabetes, and antithrombotic therapy. Principal Findings In bivariate analysis, MU practices tended to perform better on process measures, PCMH practices on more complex process measures, and eHearts practices on measures for which they were incentivized; in multivariate analysis, PCMH recognition was associated with better performance on more QMs than any other program. Conclusions Results suggest each of the programs can positively impact performance. In our data, PCMH appears to have the most positive impact.

AB - Objective To analyze the impact of three primary care practice transformation program models on performance: Meaningful Use (MU), Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH), and a pay-for-performance program (eHearts). Data Sources/Study Setting Data for seven quality measures (QM) were retrospectively collected from 192 small primary care practices between October 2009 and October 2012; practice demographics and program participation status were extracted from in-house data. Study Design Bivariate analyses were conducted to measure the impact of individual programs, and a Generalized Estimating Equation model was built to test the impact of each program alongside the others. Data Collection/Extraction Methods Monthly data were extracted via a structured query data network and were compared to program participation status, adjusting for variables including practice size and patient volume. Seven QMs were analyzed related to smoking prevention, blood pressure control, BMI, diabetes, and antithrombotic therapy. Principal Findings In bivariate analysis, MU practices tended to perform better on process measures, PCMH practices on more complex process measures, and eHearts practices on measures for which they were incentivized; in multivariate analysis, PCMH recognition was associated with better performance on more QMs than any other program. Conclusions Results suggest each of the programs can positively impact performance. In our data, PCMH appears to have the most positive impact.

KW - meaningful use

KW - pay-for-performance

KW - PCMH

KW - primary care

KW - Quality measurement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84911998981&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84911998981&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1475-6773.12243

DO - 10.1111/1475-6773.12243

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 1729

EP - 1746

JO - Health Services Research

JF - Health Services Research

SN - 0017-9124

IS - 6

ER -