Factors associated with returning to HIV care after a gap in care in New York State

Chinazo O. Cunningham, Johanna Buck, Fiona M. Shaw, Laurence S. Spiegel, Moonseong Heo, Bruce D. Agins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background:: Retention in HIV care has important implications. Few studies examining retention include comprehensive and heterogeneous populations, and few examine factors associated with returning to care after gaps in care. We identified reasons for gaps in care and factors associated with returning to care. Methods:: We extracted medical record and state-wide reporting data from 1865 patients with 1 HIV visit to a New York facility in 2008 and subsequent 6-month gap in care. Using mixed effect logistic regression, we examined sociodemographic, clinical, and facility characteristics associated with returning to care. Results:: Most patients were men (63.2%), black (51.4%), had Medicaid (53.9%). Many had CD4 counts >500 cells per cubic millimeter (34.4%) and undetectable viral loads (45.0%). Most (55.9%) had unknown reasons for gaps in care; of those with known reasons, reasons varied considerably. After a gap, 54.6% returned to care. Patients who did (vs. did not) return to care were more likely to have stable housing, longer duration of HIV, high CD4 count, suppressed viral load, antiretroviral medications, and had facilities attempt to contact them. Those who returned to care were less likely to be uninsured and have mental health problems or substance use histories. Conclusion:: Over half of our sample of patients in New York with 1 HIV visit and subsequent 6-month gap in care returned to care; no major reasons for gaps emerged. Nevertheless, our findings emphasize that stabilizing patients psychosocial factors and contacting patients after a gap in care are key strategies to retain HIV-positive patients in care in New York.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)419-427
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
Volume66
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

HIV
CD4 Lymphocyte Count
Viral Load
HIV-1
Medicaid
Medical Records
Patient Care
Mental Health
Research Design
Logistic Models
Psychology
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Infectious Diseases
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

Factors associated with returning to HIV care after a gap in care in New York State. / Cunningham, Chinazo O.; Buck, Johanna; Shaw, Fiona M.; Spiegel, Laurence S.; Heo, Moonseong; Agins, Bruce D.

In: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, Vol. 66, No. 4, 2014, p. 419-427.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cunningham, Chinazo O. ; Buck, Johanna ; Shaw, Fiona M. ; Spiegel, Laurence S. ; Heo, Moonseong ; Agins, Bruce D. / Factors associated with returning to HIV care after a gap in care in New York State. In: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2014 ; Vol. 66, No. 4. pp. 419-427.
@article{b651b851e8ca48d79e76c8d0bf90552d,
title = "Factors associated with returning to HIV care after a gap in care in New York State",
abstract = "Background:: Retention in HIV care has important implications. Few studies examining retention include comprehensive and heterogeneous populations, and few examine factors associated with returning to care after gaps in care. We identified reasons for gaps in care and factors associated with returning to care. Methods:: We extracted medical record and state-wide reporting data from 1865 patients with 1 HIV visit to a New York facility in 2008 and subsequent 6-month gap in care. Using mixed effect logistic regression, we examined sociodemographic, clinical, and facility characteristics associated with returning to care. Results:: Most patients were men (63.2{\%}), black (51.4{\%}), had Medicaid (53.9{\%}). Many had CD4 counts >500 cells per cubic millimeter (34.4{\%}) and undetectable viral loads (45.0{\%}). Most (55.9{\%}) had unknown reasons for gaps in care; of those with known reasons, reasons varied considerably. After a gap, 54.6{\%} returned to care. Patients who did (vs. did not) return to care were more likely to have stable housing, longer duration of HIV, high CD4 count, suppressed viral load, antiretroviral medications, and had facilities attempt to contact them. Those who returned to care were less likely to be uninsured and have mental health problems or substance use histories. Conclusion:: Over half of our sample of patients in New York with 1 HIV visit and subsequent 6-month gap in care returned to care; no major reasons for gaps emerged. Nevertheless, our findings emphasize that stabilizing patients psychosocial factors and contacting patients after a gap in care are key strategies to retain HIV-positive patients in care in New York.",
author = "Cunningham, {Chinazo O.} and Johanna Buck and Shaw, {Fiona M.} and Spiegel, {Laurence S.} and Moonseong Heo and Agins, {Bruce D.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1097/QAI.0000000000000171",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "66",
pages = "419--427",
journal = "Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes",
issn = "1525-4135",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors associated with returning to HIV care after a gap in care in New York State

AU - Cunningham, Chinazo O.

AU - Buck, Johanna

AU - Shaw, Fiona M.

AU - Spiegel, Laurence S.

AU - Heo, Moonseong

AU - Agins, Bruce D.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background:: Retention in HIV care has important implications. Few studies examining retention include comprehensive and heterogeneous populations, and few examine factors associated with returning to care after gaps in care. We identified reasons for gaps in care and factors associated with returning to care. Methods:: We extracted medical record and state-wide reporting data from 1865 patients with 1 HIV visit to a New York facility in 2008 and subsequent 6-month gap in care. Using mixed effect logistic regression, we examined sociodemographic, clinical, and facility characteristics associated with returning to care. Results:: Most patients were men (63.2%), black (51.4%), had Medicaid (53.9%). Many had CD4 counts >500 cells per cubic millimeter (34.4%) and undetectable viral loads (45.0%). Most (55.9%) had unknown reasons for gaps in care; of those with known reasons, reasons varied considerably. After a gap, 54.6% returned to care. Patients who did (vs. did not) return to care were more likely to have stable housing, longer duration of HIV, high CD4 count, suppressed viral load, antiretroviral medications, and had facilities attempt to contact them. Those who returned to care were less likely to be uninsured and have mental health problems or substance use histories. Conclusion:: Over half of our sample of patients in New York with 1 HIV visit and subsequent 6-month gap in care returned to care; no major reasons for gaps emerged. Nevertheless, our findings emphasize that stabilizing patients psychosocial factors and contacting patients after a gap in care are key strategies to retain HIV-positive patients in care in New York.

AB - Background:: Retention in HIV care has important implications. Few studies examining retention include comprehensive and heterogeneous populations, and few examine factors associated with returning to care after gaps in care. We identified reasons for gaps in care and factors associated with returning to care. Methods:: We extracted medical record and state-wide reporting data from 1865 patients with 1 HIV visit to a New York facility in 2008 and subsequent 6-month gap in care. Using mixed effect logistic regression, we examined sociodemographic, clinical, and facility characteristics associated with returning to care. Results:: Most patients were men (63.2%), black (51.4%), had Medicaid (53.9%). Many had CD4 counts >500 cells per cubic millimeter (34.4%) and undetectable viral loads (45.0%). Most (55.9%) had unknown reasons for gaps in care; of those with known reasons, reasons varied considerably. After a gap, 54.6% returned to care. Patients who did (vs. did not) return to care were more likely to have stable housing, longer duration of HIV, high CD4 count, suppressed viral load, antiretroviral medications, and had facilities attempt to contact them. Those who returned to care were less likely to be uninsured and have mental health problems or substance use histories. Conclusion:: Over half of our sample of patients in New York with 1 HIV visit and subsequent 6-month gap in care returned to care; no major reasons for gaps emerged. Nevertheless, our findings emphasize that stabilizing patients psychosocial factors and contacting patients after a gap in care are key strategies to retain HIV-positive patients in care in New York.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903758417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84903758417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000171

DO - 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000171

M3 - Article

VL - 66

SP - 419

EP - 427

JO - Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes

JF - Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes

SN - 1525-4135

IS - 4

ER -