Ancillary radionuclide perfusion studies in the determination of death by neurologic criteria: methods, interpretation, and lexicon—a user guide for the clinician

Lionel S. Zuckier, Nicole K. McKinnon

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Radionuclide perfusion studies have an established ancillary role in determination of death by neurologic criteria (DNC). While critically important, these examinations are not well understood by individuals outside of the imaging specialties. The purpose of this review is to clarify relevant concepts and nomenclature and provide a lexicon of relevant terminology of value to non-nuclear medicine practitioners who wish to better understand these examinations. Radionuclides were first employed to evaluate cerebral blood flow in 1969. Radionuclide DNC examinations that use lipophobic radiopharmaceuticals (RPs) entail a flow phase followed immediately by blood pool images. On flow imaging, presence of intracranial activity within the arterial vasculature is scrutinized following arrival of the RP bolus into the neck. Lipophilic RPs designed for functional brain imaging were introduced to nuclear medicine in the 1980s and were engineered to cross the blood–brain–barrier and be retained in the parenchyma. The lipophilic RP 99mTc-hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime (99mTc-HMPAO) was first used as an ancillary investigation in DNC in 1986. Examinations using lipophilic RPs entail both flow and parenchymal phase images. According to some guidelines, parenchymal phase uptake should be assessed by tomographic imaging, while other investigators consider simple planar imaging sufficient. Findings of perfusion on either the flow or parenchymal phase of the examination effectively precludes DNC. If the flow phase is omitted or somehow compromised, the parenchymal phase remains sufficient for DNC. A priori, parenchymal phase imaging is superior to flow phase imaging for several reasons and lipophilic RPs are favoured over lipophobic RPs in that both flow and parenchymal phase imaging are performed. Disadvantages of lipophilic RPs are increased cost and the need to procure them from a central laboratory, which can prove difficult, especially outside usual working hours. According to most current guidelines, both lipophilic and lipophobic RP categories are acceptable for use in ancillary investigations in DNC, with a growing overt preference for studies using the lipophilic RPs based on their ability to capture the parenchymal phase. The new adult and pediatric Canadian recommendations favour use of lipophilic RPs to variable degrees, specifically 99mTc-HMPAO, the lipophilic moiety which has undergone the greatest validation. Although ancillary use of radiopharmaceuticals is quite settled in multiple DNC guidelines and best practices, several areas of further research remain open to investigation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)771-780
Number of pages10
JournalCanadian Journal of Anesthesia
Volume70
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2023

Keywords

  • ancillary investigation
  • brain death
  • death by neurologic criteria
  • death determination
  • radionuclide imaging
  • scintigraphy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ancillary radionuclide perfusion studies in the determination of death by neurologic criteria: methods, interpretation, and lexicon—a user guide for the clinician'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this