Evolution of gender options in multiple pregnancy management

Mark I. Evans, Mara Rosner, Stephanie Andriole, Avishai Alkalay, Juliana Gebb, David W. Britt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Fetal reduction (FR) in multiples dramatically improves outcomes. We prioritize FR decisions for health and historically declined to factor gender. As male preferences apparently diminished, our bioethicist encouraged a re-evaluation. Methods: Three hundred ninety-six patients reducing triplets or twins were categorized as 3→2, 3→1, and 2→1, Major (M) anomaly or minor (m) anomaly, same gender (SG), and those for whom gender preference (GP) was possible. Higher order and non chorionic villus sampling were excluded. FR decisions were prioritized by M anomaly, Suspicious, or m anomaly. If neither, we considered GP. Results: Of 319, 214 (67%) had either M/m or SG. Of those, 3→2 with gender option: 71/79 chose male and female or had no preferences, one chose male/male, and seven chose female/female. We reduced monochorionic twins in 33/35 3→1 cases. Of 20 with GP choice, 10 chose male and 10 chose female. Of 162 2→1, 54 had M or m, 50 were SG, but of the 44 M/F twins, 20 chose male and 24 chose female. Conclusions: There has been a cultural shift mostly preferring one of each or having no preference. When reducing to one, >50% prefer a girl. In addition to identifying abnormalities, chorionic villus sampling before FR expands patient autonomy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)935-939
Number of pages5
JournalPrenatal Diagnosis
Volume33
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2013

Fingerprint

Multiple Pregnancy
Multifetal Pregnancy Reduction
Chorionic Villi Sampling
Ethicists
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics(clinical)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Evans, M. I., Rosner, M., Andriole, S., Alkalay, A., Gebb, J., & Britt, D. W. (2013). Evolution of gender options in multiple pregnancy management. Prenatal Diagnosis, 33(10), 935-939. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.4167

Evolution of gender options in multiple pregnancy management. / Evans, Mark I.; Rosner, Mara; Andriole, Stephanie; Alkalay, Avishai; Gebb, Juliana; Britt, David W.

In: Prenatal Diagnosis, Vol. 33, No. 10, 10.2013, p. 935-939.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Evans, MI, Rosner, M, Andriole, S, Alkalay, A, Gebb, J & Britt, DW 2013, 'Evolution of gender options in multiple pregnancy management', Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 935-939. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.4167
Evans MI, Rosner M, Andriole S, Alkalay A, Gebb J, Britt DW. Evolution of gender options in multiple pregnancy management. Prenatal Diagnosis. 2013 Oct;33(10):935-939. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.4167
Evans, Mark I. ; Rosner, Mara ; Andriole, Stephanie ; Alkalay, Avishai ; Gebb, Juliana ; Britt, David W. / Evolution of gender options in multiple pregnancy management. In: Prenatal Diagnosis. 2013 ; Vol. 33, No. 10. pp. 935-939.
@article{3781c58ae61c43369e8531d9bb8d8bf9,
title = "Evolution of gender options in multiple pregnancy management",
abstract = "Objective: Fetal reduction (FR) in multiples dramatically improves outcomes. We prioritize FR decisions for health and historically declined to factor gender. As male preferences apparently diminished, our bioethicist encouraged a re-evaluation. Methods: Three hundred ninety-six patients reducing triplets or twins were categorized as 3→2, 3→1, and 2→1, Major (M) anomaly or minor (m) anomaly, same gender (SG), and those for whom gender preference (GP) was possible. Higher order and non chorionic villus sampling were excluded. FR decisions were prioritized by M anomaly, Suspicious, or m anomaly. If neither, we considered GP. Results: Of 319, 214 (67{\%}) had either M/m or SG. Of those, 3→2 with gender option: 71/79 chose male and female or had no preferences, one chose male/male, and seven chose female/female. We reduced monochorionic twins in 33/35 3→1 cases. Of 20 with GP choice, 10 chose male and 10 chose female. Of 162 2→1, 54 had M or m, 50 were SG, but of the 44 M/F twins, 20 chose male and 24 chose female. Conclusions: There has been a cultural shift mostly preferring one of each or having no preference. When reducing to one, >50{\%} prefer a girl. In addition to identifying abnormalities, chorionic villus sampling before FR expands patient autonomy.",
author = "Evans, {Mark I.} and Mara Rosner and Stephanie Andriole and Avishai Alkalay and Juliana Gebb and Britt, {David W.}",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1002/pd.4167",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "935--939",
journal = "Prenatal Diagnosis",
issn = "0197-3851",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evolution of gender options in multiple pregnancy management

AU - Evans, Mark I.

AU - Rosner, Mara

AU - Andriole, Stephanie

AU - Alkalay, Avishai

AU - Gebb, Juliana

AU - Britt, David W.

PY - 2013/10

Y1 - 2013/10

N2 - Objective: Fetal reduction (FR) in multiples dramatically improves outcomes. We prioritize FR decisions for health and historically declined to factor gender. As male preferences apparently diminished, our bioethicist encouraged a re-evaluation. Methods: Three hundred ninety-six patients reducing triplets or twins were categorized as 3→2, 3→1, and 2→1, Major (M) anomaly or minor (m) anomaly, same gender (SG), and those for whom gender preference (GP) was possible. Higher order and non chorionic villus sampling were excluded. FR decisions were prioritized by M anomaly, Suspicious, or m anomaly. If neither, we considered GP. Results: Of 319, 214 (67%) had either M/m or SG. Of those, 3→2 with gender option: 71/79 chose male and female or had no preferences, one chose male/male, and seven chose female/female. We reduced monochorionic twins in 33/35 3→1 cases. Of 20 with GP choice, 10 chose male and 10 chose female. Of 162 2→1, 54 had M or m, 50 were SG, but of the 44 M/F twins, 20 chose male and 24 chose female. Conclusions: There has been a cultural shift mostly preferring one of each or having no preference. When reducing to one, >50% prefer a girl. In addition to identifying abnormalities, chorionic villus sampling before FR expands patient autonomy.

AB - Objective: Fetal reduction (FR) in multiples dramatically improves outcomes. We prioritize FR decisions for health and historically declined to factor gender. As male preferences apparently diminished, our bioethicist encouraged a re-evaluation. Methods: Three hundred ninety-six patients reducing triplets or twins were categorized as 3→2, 3→1, and 2→1, Major (M) anomaly or minor (m) anomaly, same gender (SG), and those for whom gender preference (GP) was possible. Higher order and non chorionic villus sampling were excluded. FR decisions were prioritized by M anomaly, Suspicious, or m anomaly. If neither, we considered GP. Results: Of 319, 214 (67%) had either M/m or SG. Of those, 3→2 with gender option: 71/79 chose male and female or had no preferences, one chose male/male, and seven chose female/female. We reduced monochorionic twins in 33/35 3→1 cases. Of 20 with GP choice, 10 chose male and 10 chose female. Of 162 2→1, 54 had M or m, 50 were SG, but of the 44 M/F twins, 20 chose male and 24 chose female. Conclusions: There has been a cultural shift mostly preferring one of each or having no preference. When reducing to one, >50% prefer a girl. In addition to identifying abnormalities, chorionic villus sampling before FR expands patient autonomy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884975199&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884975199&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/pd.4167

DO - 10.1002/pd.4167

M3 - Article

C2 - 23716482

AN - SCOPUS:84884975199

VL - 33

SP - 935

EP - 939

JO - Prenatal Diagnosis

JF - Prenatal Diagnosis

SN - 0197-3851

IS - 10

ER -