Evaluation of the Psoriasis Transcriptome across Different Studies by Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA)

Mayte Suárez-Fariñas, Michelle A. Lowes, Lisa C. Zaba, James G. Krueger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

103 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Our objective was to develop a consistent molecular definition of psoriasis. There have been several published microarray studies of psoriasis, and we compared disease-related genes identified across these different studies of psoriasis with our own in order to establish a consensus. Methodology/Principal Findings: We present a psoriasis transcriptome from a group of 15 patients enrolled in a clinical study, and assessed its biological validity using a set of important pathways known to be involved in psoriasis. We also identified a key set of cytokines that are now strongly implicated in driving disease-related pathology, but which are not detected well on gene array platforms and require more sensitive methods to measure mRNA levels in skin tissues. Comparison of our transcriptome with three other published lists of psoriasis genes showed apparent inconsistencies based on the number of overlapping genes. We extended the well-established approach of Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) to compare a new study with these other published list of differentially expressed genes (DEG) in a more comprehensive manner. We applied our method to these three published psoriasis transcriptomes and found them to be in good agreement with our study. Conclusions/Significance: Due to wide variability in clinical protocols, platform and sample handling, and subtle diseaserelated signals, intersection of published DEG lists was unable to establish consensus between studies. In order to leverage the power of multiple transcriptomes reported by several laboratories using different patients and protocols, more sophisticated methods like the extension of GSEA presented here, should be used in order to overcome the shortcomings of overlapping individual DEG approach. Copyright:

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere10247
JournalPLoS One
Volume5
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

psoriasis
Transcriptome
Psoriasis
transcriptome
Genes
genes
Overlapping Genes
Clinical Protocols
Pathology
Microarrays
methodology
clinical trials
Skin
cytokines
Cytokines
Tissue
Messenger RNA

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Evaluation of the Psoriasis Transcriptome across Different Studies by Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). / Suárez-Fariñas, Mayte; Lowes, Michelle A.; Zaba, Lisa C.; Krueger, James G.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 5, No. 4, e10247, 2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Suárez-Fariñas, Mayte ; Lowes, Michelle A. ; Zaba, Lisa C. ; Krueger, James G. / Evaluation of the Psoriasis Transcriptome across Different Studies by Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). In: PLoS One. 2010 ; Vol. 5, No. 4.
@article{59bb2758e7fb43058e89adbaf1811e6d,
title = "Evaluation of the Psoriasis Transcriptome across Different Studies by Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA)",
abstract = "Background: Our objective was to develop a consistent molecular definition of psoriasis. There have been several published microarray studies of psoriasis, and we compared disease-related genes identified across these different studies of psoriasis with our own in order to establish a consensus. Methodology/Principal Findings: We present a psoriasis transcriptome from a group of 15 patients enrolled in a clinical study, and assessed its biological validity using a set of important pathways known to be involved in psoriasis. We also identified a key set of cytokines that are now strongly implicated in driving disease-related pathology, but which are not detected well on gene array platforms and require more sensitive methods to measure mRNA levels in skin tissues. Comparison of our transcriptome with three other published lists of psoriasis genes showed apparent inconsistencies based on the number of overlapping genes. We extended the well-established approach of Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) to compare a new study with these other published list of differentially expressed genes (DEG) in a more comprehensive manner. We applied our method to these three published psoriasis transcriptomes and found them to be in good agreement with our study. Conclusions/Significance: Due to wide variability in clinical protocols, platform and sample handling, and subtle diseaserelated signals, intersection of published DEG lists was unable to establish consensus between studies. In order to leverage the power of multiple transcriptomes reported by several laboratories using different patients and protocols, more sophisticated methods like the extension of GSEA presented here, should be used in order to overcome the shortcomings of overlapping individual DEG approach. Copyright:",
author = "Mayte Su{\'a}rez-Fari{\~n}as and Lowes, {Michelle A.} and Zaba, {Lisa C.} and Krueger, {James G.}",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0010247",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of the Psoriasis Transcriptome across Different Studies by Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA)

AU - Suárez-Fariñas, Mayte

AU - Lowes, Michelle A.

AU - Zaba, Lisa C.

AU - Krueger, James G.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Background: Our objective was to develop a consistent molecular definition of psoriasis. There have been several published microarray studies of psoriasis, and we compared disease-related genes identified across these different studies of psoriasis with our own in order to establish a consensus. Methodology/Principal Findings: We present a psoriasis transcriptome from a group of 15 patients enrolled in a clinical study, and assessed its biological validity using a set of important pathways known to be involved in psoriasis. We also identified a key set of cytokines that are now strongly implicated in driving disease-related pathology, but which are not detected well on gene array platforms and require more sensitive methods to measure mRNA levels in skin tissues. Comparison of our transcriptome with three other published lists of psoriasis genes showed apparent inconsistencies based on the number of overlapping genes. We extended the well-established approach of Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) to compare a new study with these other published list of differentially expressed genes (DEG) in a more comprehensive manner. We applied our method to these three published psoriasis transcriptomes and found them to be in good agreement with our study. Conclusions/Significance: Due to wide variability in clinical protocols, platform and sample handling, and subtle diseaserelated signals, intersection of published DEG lists was unable to establish consensus between studies. In order to leverage the power of multiple transcriptomes reported by several laboratories using different patients and protocols, more sophisticated methods like the extension of GSEA presented here, should be used in order to overcome the shortcomings of overlapping individual DEG approach. Copyright:

AB - Background: Our objective was to develop a consistent molecular definition of psoriasis. There have been several published microarray studies of psoriasis, and we compared disease-related genes identified across these different studies of psoriasis with our own in order to establish a consensus. Methodology/Principal Findings: We present a psoriasis transcriptome from a group of 15 patients enrolled in a clinical study, and assessed its biological validity using a set of important pathways known to be involved in psoriasis. We also identified a key set of cytokines that are now strongly implicated in driving disease-related pathology, but which are not detected well on gene array platforms and require more sensitive methods to measure mRNA levels in skin tissues. Comparison of our transcriptome with three other published lists of psoriasis genes showed apparent inconsistencies based on the number of overlapping genes. We extended the well-established approach of Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) to compare a new study with these other published list of differentially expressed genes (DEG) in a more comprehensive manner. We applied our method to these three published psoriasis transcriptomes and found them to be in good agreement with our study. Conclusions/Significance: Due to wide variability in clinical protocols, platform and sample handling, and subtle diseaserelated signals, intersection of published DEG lists was unable to establish consensus between studies. In order to leverage the power of multiple transcriptomes reported by several laboratories using different patients and protocols, more sophisticated methods like the extension of GSEA presented here, should be used in order to overcome the shortcomings of overlapping individual DEG approach. Copyright:

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956298963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956298963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0010247

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0010247

M3 - Article

C2 - 20422035

AN - SCOPUS:77956298963

VL - 5

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 4

M1 - e10247

ER -