Evaluation of teleradiology for interpretation of intravenous urograms

Ethan J. Halpern, Jeffrey H. Newhouse, E. Stephen Amis, Herman W. Lubetsky, Robert M. Jaffe, Peter D. Esser, Philip O. Alderson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

The diagnostic yield of a commercial teleradiology/picture archiving and communication system (ATT-Philips Comm View T/PACS) was evaluated for 100 urograms. A single image from each examination was digitized (2048×1684×12-bit pixels) and transmitted from a satellite hospital over a T-1 line using the T/PACS system. The video display of each digitized image was reviewed independently by four radiologists. The same four radiologists reviewed the original film images at a different time without knowledge of their T/PACS interpretation. There was no statistically significant difference in the sensitivity for clinical findings between T/PACS (86%) and film (89%). The false positive rate, however, was significantly higher with T/PACS than with film (44 versus 32 false positive findings per 100 films). We conclude that T/PACS of the type studied here demonstrates sufficient sensitivity for the detection of clinically important urographic findings in the emergency setting. A final reading of the original films is still necessary, however, to assure appropriate specificity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)101-106
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Digital Imaging
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1992
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Computer Science Applications

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of teleradiology for interpretation of intravenous urograms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this