TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of QC 3
T2 - The automatic quality control swystem on the ABL80 FLEX
AU - Nichols, James H.
AU - Karim, Sadiqa
AU - Arabadjief, Melissa
PY - 2008/6/1
Y1 - 2008/6/1
N2 - OBJECTIVE:: The ABL80 FLEX (Radiometer-Copenhagen, Denmark) is a portable blood gas analyzer for blood gas (pH, PCO2, PO2), electrolyte (Na, K, Cl), ionized calcium, and hematocrit testing. The analyzer has an onboard quality control system, QC, that automatically calibrates, performs 3 levels of aqueous quality control, and conducts system checks to establish and verify analyzer performance. This study evaluated the ability of the QC system to detect potential sources of error that may affect patient results. METHODOLOGY:: External, surrogate quality control samples were analyzed 3 times a day for 30 days to determine the equivalence of external and onboard quality control. In addition, the analyzer was challenged with air bubbles during control and specimen analysis and introduction of hemolyzed specimens. RESULTS:: External, surrogate sample controls failed on 6 occasions when an incorrect temperature was input into the analyzer. These failures were acceptable once proper temperature correction was applied to the external control samples. QC appropriately detected air in the sensors, open inlet port, disconnected sensors, and problems with reagent sensor and solution packs. Grossly hemolyzed specimens resulted in no sample carryover or long-term effects on the sensor. CONCLUSIONS:: The QC internal control system appropriately detected common sources of operator and analyzer failure on the ABL80 FLEX blood gas analyzer. QC did a better job at detecting analyzer problems compared with external, surrogate quality control by continuously detecting potential errors automatically.
AB - OBJECTIVE:: The ABL80 FLEX (Radiometer-Copenhagen, Denmark) is a portable blood gas analyzer for blood gas (pH, PCO2, PO2), electrolyte (Na, K, Cl), ionized calcium, and hematocrit testing. The analyzer has an onboard quality control system, QC, that automatically calibrates, performs 3 levels of aqueous quality control, and conducts system checks to establish and verify analyzer performance. This study evaluated the ability of the QC system to detect potential sources of error that may affect patient results. METHODOLOGY:: External, surrogate quality control samples were analyzed 3 times a day for 30 days to determine the equivalence of external and onboard quality control. In addition, the analyzer was challenged with air bubbles during control and specimen analysis and introduction of hemolyzed specimens. RESULTS:: External, surrogate sample controls failed on 6 occasions when an incorrect temperature was input into the analyzer. These failures were acceptable once proper temperature correction was applied to the external control samples. QC appropriately detected air in the sensors, open inlet port, disconnected sensors, and problems with reagent sensor and solution packs. Grossly hemolyzed specimens resulted in no sample carryover or long-term effects on the sensor. CONCLUSIONS:: The QC internal control system appropriately detected common sources of operator and analyzer failure on the ABL80 FLEX blood gas analyzer. QC did a better job at detecting analyzer problems compared with external, surrogate quality control by continuously detecting potential errors automatically.
KW - Automation
KW - Blood gas analysis
KW - Point-of-care testing
KW - Quality control
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67650127550&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67650127550&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/POC.0b013e3181727cde
DO - 10.1097/POC.0b013e3181727cde
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:67650127550
SN - 1533-029X
VL - 7
SP - 54
EP - 59
JO - Point of Care
JF - Point of Care
IS - 2
ER -