Evaluation of Oral Cavity DNA Extraction Methods on Bacterial and Fungal Microbiota

Jennifer Rosenbaum, Mykhaylo Usyk, Zigui Chen, Christine P. Zolnik, Heidi E. Jones, Levi Waldron, Jennifer B. Dowd, Lorna E. Thorpe, Robert D. Burk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the most effective method of DNA extraction of oral mouthwash samples for use in microbiome studies that utilize next generation sequencing (NGS). Eight enzymatic and mechanical DNA extraction methods were tested. Extracted DNA was amplified using barcoded primers targeting the V6 variable region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene and the ITS1 region of the fungal ribosomal gene cluster and sequenced using the Illumina NGS platform. Sequenced reads were analyzed using QIIME and R. The eight methods yielded significantly different quantities of DNA (p < 0.001), with the phenol-chloroform extraction method producing the highest total yield. There were no significant differences in observed bacterial or fungal Shannon diversity (p = 0.64, p = 0.93 respectively) by extraction method. Bray-Curtis beta-diversity did not demonstrate statistically significant differences between the eight extraction methods based on bacterial (R2 = 0.086, p = 1.00) and fungal (R2 = 0.039, p = 1.00) assays. No differences were seen between methods with or without bead-beating. These data indicate that choice of DNA extraction method affect total DNA recovery without significantly affecting the observed microbiome.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number1531
JournalScientific Reports
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2019

Fingerprint

Mouth
DNA
Microbiota
Fungal Genes
Mouthwashes
Multigene Family
Chloroform
Phenol
Mycobiome
rRNA Genes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Evaluation of Oral Cavity DNA Extraction Methods on Bacterial and Fungal Microbiota. / Rosenbaum, Jennifer; Usyk, Mykhaylo; Chen, Zigui; Zolnik, Christine P.; Jones, Heidi E.; Waldron, Levi; Dowd, Jennifer B.; Thorpe, Lorna E.; Burk, Robert D.

In: Scientific Reports, Vol. 9, No. 1, 1531, 01.12.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rosenbaum, J, Usyk, M, Chen, Z, Zolnik, CP, Jones, HE, Waldron, L, Dowd, JB, Thorpe, LE & Burk, RD 2019, 'Evaluation of Oral Cavity DNA Extraction Methods on Bacterial and Fungal Microbiota', Scientific Reports, vol. 9, no. 1, 1531. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-38049-6
Rosenbaum, Jennifer ; Usyk, Mykhaylo ; Chen, Zigui ; Zolnik, Christine P. ; Jones, Heidi E. ; Waldron, Levi ; Dowd, Jennifer B. ; Thorpe, Lorna E. ; Burk, Robert D. / Evaluation of Oral Cavity DNA Extraction Methods on Bacterial and Fungal Microbiota. In: Scientific Reports. 2019 ; Vol. 9, No. 1.
@article{949ac3640ddc4a959e9454b200621b84,
title = "Evaluation of Oral Cavity DNA Extraction Methods on Bacterial and Fungal Microbiota",
abstract = "The objective of this study was to evaluate the most effective method of DNA extraction of oral mouthwash samples for use in microbiome studies that utilize next generation sequencing (NGS). Eight enzymatic and mechanical DNA extraction methods were tested. Extracted DNA was amplified using barcoded primers targeting the V6 variable region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene and the ITS1 region of the fungal ribosomal gene cluster and sequenced using the Illumina NGS platform. Sequenced reads were analyzed using QIIME and R. The eight methods yielded significantly different quantities of DNA (p < 0.001), with the phenol-chloroform extraction method producing the highest total yield. There were no significant differences in observed bacterial or fungal Shannon diversity (p = 0.64, p = 0.93 respectively) by extraction method. Bray-Curtis beta-diversity did not demonstrate statistically significant differences between the eight extraction methods based on bacterial (R2 = 0.086, p = 1.00) and fungal (R2 = 0.039, p = 1.00) assays. No differences were seen between methods with or without bead-beating. These data indicate that choice of DNA extraction method affect total DNA recovery without significantly affecting the observed microbiome.",
author = "Jennifer Rosenbaum and Mykhaylo Usyk and Zigui Chen and Zolnik, {Christine P.} and Jones, {Heidi E.} and Levi Waldron and Dowd, {Jennifer B.} and Thorpe, {Lorna E.} and Burk, {Robert D.}",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/s41598-018-38049-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
journal = "Scientific Reports",
issn = "2045-2322",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of Oral Cavity DNA Extraction Methods on Bacterial and Fungal Microbiota

AU - Rosenbaum, Jennifer

AU - Usyk, Mykhaylo

AU - Chen, Zigui

AU - Zolnik, Christine P.

AU - Jones, Heidi E.

AU - Waldron, Levi

AU - Dowd, Jennifer B.

AU - Thorpe, Lorna E.

AU - Burk, Robert D.

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - The objective of this study was to evaluate the most effective method of DNA extraction of oral mouthwash samples for use in microbiome studies that utilize next generation sequencing (NGS). Eight enzymatic and mechanical DNA extraction methods were tested. Extracted DNA was amplified using barcoded primers targeting the V6 variable region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene and the ITS1 region of the fungal ribosomal gene cluster and sequenced using the Illumina NGS platform. Sequenced reads were analyzed using QIIME and R. The eight methods yielded significantly different quantities of DNA (p < 0.001), with the phenol-chloroform extraction method producing the highest total yield. There were no significant differences in observed bacterial or fungal Shannon diversity (p = 0.64, p = 0.93 respectively) by extraction method. Bray-Curtis beta-diversity did not demonstrate statistically significant differences between the eight extraction methods based on bacterial (R2 = 0.086, p = 1.00) and fungal (R2 = 0.039, p = 1.00) assays. No differences were seen between methods with or without bead-beating. These data indicate that choice of DNA extraction method affect total DNA recovery without significantly affecting the observed microbiome.

AB - The objective of this study was to evaluate the most effective method of DNA extraction of oral mouthwash samples for use in microbiome studies that utilize next generation sequencing (NGS). Eight enzymatic and mechanical DNA extraction methods were tested. Extracted DNA was amplified using barcoded primers targeting the V6 variable region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene and the ITS1 region of the fungal ribosomal gene cluster and sequenced using the Illumina NGS platform. Sequenced reads were analyzed using QIIME and R. The eight methods yielded significantly different quantities of DNA (p < 0.001), with the phenol-chloroform extraction method producing the highest total yield. There were no significant differences in observed bacterial or fungal Shannon diversity (p = 0.64, p = 0.93 respectively) by extraction method. Bray-Curtis beta-diversity did not demonstrate statistically significant differences between the eight extraction methods based on bacterial (R2 = 0.086, p = 1.00) and fungal (R2 = 0.039, p = 1.00) assays. No differences were seen between methods with or without bead-beating. These data indicate that choice of DNA extraction method affect total DNA recovery without significantly affecting the observed microbiome.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061131073&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061131073&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41598-018-38049-6

DO - 10.1038/s41598-018-38049-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 30728424

AN - SCOPUS:85061131073

VL - 9

JO - Scientific Reports

JF - Scientific Reports

SN - 2045-2322

IS - 1

M1 - 1531

ER -