Evaluation of blood pressure and baroreflex sensitivity by radial artery tonometry versus finger arteriolar photoplethysmography

Adrienne S. Zion, Matthew N. Bartels, Jill M. Wecht, Richard P. Sloan, John A. Downey, Ronald E. De Meersman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Published normative data of noninvasive blood pressures (BPs) and autonomic modulations have been primarily derived from the finger arteriole using the Finapres (Ohmeda Co., Englewood, CO), a device that is no longer manufactured. Currently, beat-to-beat BP are obtained from the radial artery using the Colin tonometer. Methods: We compared BP and autonomic parameters in a crossover design between the two devices in 29 subjects during seated rest and a 0.1-Hz breathing protocol. In addition, we tested whether finger arteriolar BP differences were due to pressure changes exerted by the radial tonometer. Results: Uniformly, BP measured at the radial artery were significantly higher than those from the finger arteriole. Radial BP (106 ± 19.5 mm Hg) were higher than finger arteriolar BP (95.8 ± 13.7 mm Hg) (P < .005). Tonometric baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) (24.0 ± 18 msec/mm Hg) was higher compared to photoplethysmographic BRS (12.0 ± 7.7 msec/mm Hg; P < .0003). Systolic BP (radial artery) (115 ± 25 mm Hg) were higher compared to finger arteriolar BP (97.7 ± 19 mm Hg; P < .0025) during breathing, as was BRS (25.9 ± 11.6 msec/mm Hg v 21.5 ± 11.6 msec/mm Hg; P < .05). Differences in the low frequency systolic BP (LFSBP), representative of sympathetic vasomotor modulation, between the two methods, whether absolute, normalized, or log-transformed were not observed. Conclusions: There were no differences in arteriolar BP values in the presence or absence of radial artery tonometric pressure. These findings indicate that differences exist in systolic BP and BRS using the tonometer (radial artery) versus the Finapres (Ohmeda Co.) (finger arteriole). Furthermore, these differences are not due to pressure exerted by the radial artery tonometer that supplies blood to the finger arteriole.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)371-374
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Hypertension
Volume16
Issue number5 I
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Photoplethysmography
Radial Artery
Baroreflex
Manometry
Fingers
Blood Pressure
Arterioles
Pressure
Respiration
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Autonomic modulation
  • Systolic blood pressure
  • Vasomotor sympathetic activity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Evaluation of blood pressure and baroreflex sensitivity by radial artery tonometry versus finger arteriolar photoplethysmography. / Zion, Adrienne S.; Bartels, Matthew N.; Wecht, Jill M.; Sloan, Richard P.; Downey, John A.; De Meersman, Ronald E.

In: American Journal of Hypertension, Vol. 16, No. 5 I, 01.05.2003, p. 371-374.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zion, Adrienne S. ; Bartels, Matthew N. ; Wecht, Jill M. ; Sloan, Richard P. ; Downey, John A. ; De Meersman, Ronald E. / Evaluation of blood pressure and baroreflex sensitivity by radial artery tonometry versus finger arteriolar photoplethysmography. In: American Journal of Hypertension. 2003 ; Vol. 16, No. 5 I. pp. 371-374.
@article{997efadd625c4ab4b09abbd48f5467cc,
title = "Evaluation of blood pressure and baroreflex sensitivity by radial artery tonometry versus finger arteriolar photoplethysmography",
abstract = "Background: Published normative data of noninvasive blood pressures (BPs) and autonomic modulations have been primarily derived from the finger arteriole using the Finapres (Ohmeda Co., Englewood, CO), a device that is no longer manufactured. Currently, beat-to-beat BP are obtained from the radial artery using the Colin tonometer. Methods: We compared BP and autonomic parameters in a crossover design between the two devices in 29 subjects during seated rest and a 0.1-Hz breathing protocol. In addition, we tested whether finger arteriolar BP differences were due to pressure changes exerted by the radial tonometer. Results: Uniformly, BP measured at the radial artery were significantly higher than those from the finger arteriole. Radial BP (106 ± 19.5 mm Hg) were higher than finger arteriolar BP (95.8 ± 13.7 mm Hg) (P < .005). Tonometric baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) (24.0 ± 18 msec/mm Hg) was higher compared to photoplethysmographic BRS (12.0 ± 7.7 msec/mm Hg; P < .0003). Systolic BP (radial artery) (115 ± 25 mm Hg) were higher compared to finger arteriolar BP (97.7 ± 19 mm Hg; P < .0025) during breathing, as was BRS (25.9 ± 11.6 msec/mm Hg v 21.5 ± 11.6 msec/mm Hg; P < .05). Differences in the low frequency systolic BP (LFSBP), representative of sympathetic vasomotor modulation, between the two methods, whether absolute, normalized, or log-transformed were not observed. Conclusions: There were no differences in arteriolar BP values in the presence or absence of radial artery tonometric pressure. These findings indicate that differences exist in systolic BP and BRS using the tonometer (radial artery) versus the Finapres (Ohmeda Co.) (finger arteriole). Furthermore, these differences are not due to pressure exerted by the radial artery tonometer that supplies blood to the finger arteriole.",
keywords = "Autonomic modulation, Systolic blood pressure, Vasomotor sympathetic activity",
author = "Zion, {Adrienne S.} and Bartels, {Matthew N.} and Wecht, {Jill M.} and Sloan, {Richard P.} and Downey, {John A.} and {De Meersman}, {Ronald E.}",
year = "2003",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0895-7061(03)00039-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "371--374",
journal = "Journal of clinical hypertension",
issn = "0895-7061",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "5 I",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of blood pressure and baroreflex sensitivity by radial artery tonometry versus finger arteriolar photoplethysmography

AU - Zion, Adrienne S.

AU - Bartels, Matthew N.

AU - Wecht, Jill M.

AU - Sloan, Richard P.

AU - Downey, John A.

AU - De Meersman, Ronald E.

PY - 2003/5/1

Y1 - 2003/5/1

N2 - Background: Published normative data of noninvasive blood pressures (BPs) and autonomic modulations have been primarily derived from the finger arteriole using the Finapres (Ohmeda Co., Englewood, CO), a device that is no longer manufactured. Currently, beat-to-beat BP are obtained from the radial artery using the Colin tonometer. Methods: We compared BP and autonomic parameters in a crossover design between the two devices in 29 subjects during seated rest and a 0.1-Hz breathing protocol. In addition, we tested whether finger arteriolar BP differences were due to pressure changes exerted by the radial tonometer. Results: Uniformly, BP measured at the radial artery were significantly higher than those from the finger arteriole. Radial BP (106 ± 19.5 mm Hg) were higher than finger arteriolar BP (95.8 ± 13.7 mm Hg) (P < .005). Tonometric baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) (24.0 ± 18 msec/mm Hg) was higher compared to photoplethysmographic BRS (12.0 ± 7.7 msec/mm Hg; P < .0003). Systolic BP (radial artery) (115 ± 25 mm Hg) were higher compared to finger arteriolar BP (97.7 ± 19 mm Hg; P < .0025) during breathing, as was BRS (25.9 ± 11.6 msec/mm Hg v 21.5 ± 11.6 msec/mm Hg; P < .05). Differences in the low frequency systolic BP (LFSBP), representative of sympathetic vasomotor modulation, between the two methods, whether absolute, normalized, or log-transformed were not observed. Conclusions: There were no differences in arteriolar BP values in the presence or absence of radial artery tonometric pressure. These findings indicate that differences exist in systolic BP and BRS using the tonometer (radial artery) versus the Finapres (Ohmeda Co.) (finger arteriole). Furthermore, these differences are not due to pressure exerted by the radial artery tonometer that supplies blood to the finger arteriole.

AB - Background: Published normative data of noninvasive blood pressures (BPs) and autonomic modulations have been primarily derived from the finger arteriole using the Finapres (Ohmeda Co., Englewood, CO), a device that is no longer manufactured. Currently, beat-to-beat BP are obtained from the radial artery using the Colin tonometer. Methods: We compared BP and autonomic parameters in a crossover design between the two devices in 29 subjects during seated rest and a 0.1-Hz breathing protocol. In addition, we tested whether finger arteriolar BP differences were due to pressure changes exerted by the radial tonometer. Results: Uniformly, BP measured at the radial artery were significantly higher than those from the finger arteriole. Radial BP (106 ± 19.5 mm Hg) were higher than finger arteriolar BP (95.8 ± 13.7 mm Hg) (P < .005). Tonometric baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) (24.0 ± 18 msec/mm Hg) was higher compared to photoplethysmographic BRS (12.0 ± 7.7 msec/mm Hg; P < .0003). Systolic BP (radial artery) (115 ± 25 mm Hg) were higher compared to finger arteriolar BP (97.7 ± 19 mm Hg; P < .0025) during breathing, as was BRS (25.9 ± 11.6 msec/mm Hg v 21.5 ± 11.6 msec/mm Hg; P < .05). Differences in the low frequency systolic BP (LFSBP), representative of sympathetic vasomotor modulation, between the two methods, whether absolute, normalized, or log-transformed were not observed. Conclusions: There were no differences in arteriolar BP values in the presence or absence of radial artery tonometric pressure. These findings indicate that differences exist in systolic BP and BRS using the tonometer (radial artery) versus the Finapres (Ohmeda Co.) (finger arteriole). Furthermore, these differences are not due to pressure exerted by the radial artery tonometer that supplies blood to the finger arteriole.

KW - Autonomic modulation

KW - Systolic blood pressure

KW - Vasomotor sympathetic activity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037727844&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037727844&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0895-7061(03)00039-6

DO - 10.1016/S0895-7061(03)00039-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 12745198

AN - SCOPUS:0037727844

VL - 16

SP - 371

EP - 374

JO - Journal of clinical hypertension

JF - Journal of clinical hypertension

SN - 0895-7061

IS - 5 I

ER -