Evaluation of a web-based, pictorial diet history questionnaire

Jeannette M. Beasley, Amanda Davis, William T. Riley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To develop and evaluate a pictorial, web-based version of the NCI diet history questionnaire (Web-PDHQ). Design: The Web-PDHQ and paper version of the DHQ (Paper-DHQ) were administered 4 weeks apart with 218 participants randomised to order. Dietary data from the Web-PDHQ and Paper-DHQ were validated using a randomly selected 4 d food record recording period (including a weekend day) and two randomly selected 24 h dietary recalls during the 4 weeks intervening between these two diet history administrations. Setting: Research office in Reston, VA, USA. Participants: Computer-literate men and women recruited through newspaper advertisements. Results: Mean correlation of energy and the twenty-five examined nutrients between the Web-PDHQ and Paper-DHQ was 0.71 and 0.51, unadjusted and energy-adjusted by the residual method, respectively. Moderate mean correlations (unadjusted 0.41 and 0.38; energy-adjusted 0.41 and 0.34) were obtained between both the Web-PDHQ and Paper-DHQ with the 4 d food record on energy and nutrients, but the correlations between the Web-PDHQ and Paper-DHQ with the 24 h recalls were modest (unadjusted 0.31 and 0.29; energy-adjusted 0.37 and 0.26). A subset of participants (n 48) completing the Web-PDHQ at the initial visit performed a retest on the same questionnaire 1 week later to determine repeatability, and the unadjusted mean correlation was 0.82. Conclusions: These data indicate that the Web-PDHQ has comparable repeatability and validity to the Paper-DHQ but did not improve the relationship of the DHQ to other food intake measures (e.g. food records, 24 h recall).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)651-659
Number of pages9
JournalPublic Health Nutrition
Volume12
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Diet
Food
Newspapers
Eating
Surveys and Questionnaires
Research

Keywords

  • Diet
  • Epidemiological methods
  • Internet
  • Nutrition assessment
  • Technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Nutrition and Dietetics
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Evaluation of a web-based, pictorial diet history questionnaire. / Beasley, Jeannette M.; Davis, Amanda; Riley, William T.

In: Public Health Nutrition, Vol. 12, No. 5, 05.2009, p. 651-659.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Beasley, Jeannette M. ; Davis, Amanda ; Riley, William T. / Evaluation of a web-based, pictorial diet history questionnaire. In: Public Health Nutrition. 2009 ; Vol. 12, No. 5. pp. 651-659.
@article{9c6699235e7d4f70960c484514652a2b,
title = "Evaluation of a web-based, pictorial diet history questionnaire",
abstract = "Objective: To develop and evaluate a pictorial, web-based version of the NCI diet history questionnaire (Web-PDHQ). Design: The Web-PDHQ and paper version of the DHQ (Paper-DHQ) were administered 4 weeks apart with 218 participants randomised to order. Dietary data from the Web-PDHQ and Paper-DHQ were validated using a randomly selected 4 d food record recording period (including a weekend day) and two randomly selected 24 h dietary recalls during the 4 weeks intervening between these two diet history administrations. Setting: Research office in Reston, VA, USA. Participants: Computer-literate men and women recruited through newspaper advertisements. Results: Mean correlation of energy and the twenty-five examined nutrients between the Web-PDHQ and Paper-DHQ was 0.71 and 0.51, unadjusted and energy-adjusted by the residual method, respectively. Moderate mean correlations (unadjusted 0.41 and 0.38; energy-adjusted 0.41 and 0.34) were obtained between both the Web-PDHQ and Paper-DHQ with the 4 d food record on energy and nutrients, but the correlations between the Web-PDHQ and Paper-DHQ with the 24 h recalls were modest (unadjusted 0.31 and 0.29; energy-adjusted 0.37 and 0.26). A subset of participants (n 48) completing the Web-PDHQ at the initial visit performed a retest on the same questionnaire 1 week later to determine repeatability, and the unadjusted mean correlation was 0.82. Conclusions: These data indicate that the Web-PDHQ has comparable repeatability and validity to the Paper-DHQ but did not improve the relationship of the DHQ to other food intake measures (e.g. food records, 24 h recall).",
keywords = "Diet, Epidemiological methods, Internet, Nutrition assessment, Technology",
author = "Beasley, {Jeannette M.} and Amanda Davis and Riley, {William T.}",
year = "2009",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1017/S1368980008002668",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "651--659",
journal = "Public Health Nutrition",
issn = "1368-9800",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of a web-based, pictorial diet history questionnaire

AU - Beasley, Jeannette M.

AU - Davis, Amanda

AU - Riley, William T.

PY - 2009/5

Y1 - 2009/5

N2 - Objective: To develop and evaluate a pictorial, web-based version of the NCI diet history questionnaire (Web-PDHQ). Design: The Web-PDHQ and paper version of the DHQ (Paper-DHQ) were administered 4 weeks apart with 218 participants randomised to order. Dietary data from the Web-PDHQ and Paper-DHQ were validated using a randomly selected 4 d food record recording period (including a weekend day) and two randomly selected 24 h dietary recalls during the 4 weeks intervening between these two diet history administrations. Setting: Research office in Reston, VA, USA. Participants: Computer-literate men and women recruited through newspaper advertisements. Results: Mean correlation of energy and the twenty-five examined nutrients between the Web-PDHQ and Paper-DHQ was 0.71 and 0.51, unadjusted and energy-adjusted by the residual method, respectively. Moderate mean correlations (unadjusted 0.41 and 0.38; energy-adjusted 0.41 and 0.34) were obtained between both the Web-PDHQ and Paper-DHQ with the 4 d food record on energy and nutrients, but the correlations between the Web-PDHQ and Paper-DHQ with the 24 h recalls were modest (unadjusted 0.31 and 0.29; energy-adjusted 0.37 and 0.26). A subset of participants (n 48) completing the Web-PDHQ at the initial visit performed a retest on the same questionnaire 1 week later to determine repeatability, and the unadjusted mean correlation was 0.82. Conclusions: These data indicate that the Web-PDHQ has comparable repeatability and validity to the Paper-DHQ but did not improve the relationship of the DHQ to other food intake measures (e.g. food records, 24 h recall).

AB - Objective: To develop and evaluate a pictorial, web-based version of the NCI diet history questionnaire (Web-PDHQ). Design: The Web-PDHQ and paper version of the DHQ (Paper-DHQ) were administered 4 weeks apart with 218 participants randomised to order. Dietary data from the Web-PDHQ and Paper-DHQ were validated using a randomly selected 4 d food record recording period (including a weekend day) and two randomly selected 24 h dietary recalls during the 4 weeks intervening between these two diet history administrations. Setting: Research office in Reston, VA, USA. Participants: Computer-literate men and women recruited through newspaper advertisements. Results: Mean correlation of energy and the twenty-five examined nutrients between the Web-PDHQ and Paper-DHQ was 0.71 and 0.51, unadjusted and energy-adjusted by the residual method, respectively. Moderate mean correlations (unadjusted 0.41 and 0.38; energy-adjusted 0.41 and 0.34) were obtained between both the Web-PDHQ and Paper-DHQ with the 4 d food record on energy and nutrients, but the correlations between the Web-PDHQ and Paper-DHQ with the 24 h recalls were modest (unadjusted 0.31 and 0.29; energy-adjusted 0.37 and 0.26). A subset of participants (n 48) completing the Web-PDHQ at the initial visit performed a retest on the same questionnaire 1 week later to determine repeatability, and the unadjusted mean correlation was 0.82. Conclusions: These data indicate that the Web-PDHQ has comparable repeatability and validity to the Paper-DHQ but did not improve the relationship of the DHQ to other food intake measures (e.g. food records, 24 h recall).

KW - Diet

KW - Epidemiological methods

KW - Internet

KW - Nutrition assessment

KW - Technology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67650382092&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67650382092&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1368980008002668

DO - 10.1017/S1368980008002668

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 651

EP - 659

JO - Public Health Nutrition

JF - Public Health Nutrition

SN - 1368-9800

IS - 5

ER -