Evaluation of a patient-centered after visit summary in primary care

Alex D. Federman, Lina Jandorf, Joseph P. DeLuca, Mary T. Gover, Angela Sanchez Munoz, Li Chen, Michael S. Wolf, Joseph Kannry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To test the impact of a redesigned, patient-centered after visit summary (AVS) on patients’ and clinicians’ ratings of and experience with the document. Methods: We conducted a difference-in-differences (DiD) evaluation of the impact of the redesigned AVS before and after its introduction in an academic primary care practice compared to a concurrent control practice. Outcomes included ratings of the features of the AVS. Results: The intervention site had 118 and 98 patients in the pre- and post-intervention periods and the control site had 99 and 105, respectively. In adjusted DiD analysis, introduction of the patient-centered AVS in the intervention site increased patient reports that the AVS was an effective reminder for taking medications (p =.004) and of receipt of the AVS from clinicians (p =.002). However, they were more likely to perceive it as too long (p =.04). There were no significant changes in overall rating of the AVS by clinicians or their likelihood of providing it to patients. Conclusions: A patient-centered AVS increased the number of patients receiving it and reporting that it would help them remember to take their medications. Practice implications: Improvements in the patient-centeredness of the AVS may improve its usefulness as a document to support self-management in primary care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPatient Education and Counseling
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
Self Care

Keywords

  • After visit summary
  • Electronic health record (EHR)
  • Health literacy
  • Patient-Centered

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Evaluation of a patient-centered after visit summary in primary care. / Federman, Alex D.; Jandorf, Lina; DeLuca, Joseph P.; Gover, Mary T.; Sanchez Munoz, Angela; Chen, Li; Wolf, Michael S.; Kannry, Joseph.

In: Patient Education and Counseling, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Federman, Alex D. ; Jandorf, Lina ; DeLuca, Joseph P. ; Gover, Mary T. ; Sanchez Munoz, Angela ; Chen, Li ; Wolf, Michael S. ; Kannry, Joseph. / Evaluation of a patient-centered after visit summary in primary care. In: Patient Education and Counseling. 2018.
@article{875c6482be4a45ceb4f5158a5b3a72cd,
title = "Evaluation of a patient-centered after visit summary in primary care",
abstract = "Objective: To test the impact of a redesigned, patient-centered after visit summary (AVS) on patients’ and clinicians’ ratings of and experience with the document. Methods: We conducted a difference-in-differences (DiD) evaluation of the impact of the redesigned AVS before and after its introduction in an academic primary care practice compared to a concurrent control practice. Outcomes included ratings of the features of the AVS. Results: The intervention site had 118 and 98 patients in the pre- and post-intervention periods and the control site had 99 and 105, respectively. In adjusted DiD analysis, introduction of the patient-centered AVS in the intervention site increased patient reports that the AVS was an effective reminder for taking medications (p =.004) and of receipt of the AVS from clinicians (p =.002). However, they were more likely to perceive it as too long (p =.04). There were no significant changes in overall rating of the AVS by clinicians or their likelihood of providing it to patients. Conclusions: A patient-centered AVS increased the number of patients receiving it and reporting that it would help them remember to take their medications. Practice implications: Improvements in the patient-centeredness of the AVS may improve its usefulness as a document to support self-management in primary care.",
keywords = "After visit summary, Electronic health record (EHR), Health literacy, Patient-Centered",
author = "Federman, {Alex D.} and Lina Jandorf and DeLuca, {Joseph P.} and Gover, {Mary T.} and {Sanchez Munoz}, Angela and Li Chen and Wolf, {Michael S.} and Joseph Kannry",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.pec.2018.02.017",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Patient Education and Counseling",
issn = "0738-3991",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of a patient-centered after visit summary in primary care

AU - Federman, Alex D.

AU - Jandorf, Lina

AU - DeLuca, Joseph P.

AU - Gover, Mary T.

AU - Sanchez Munoz, Angela

AU - Chen, Li

AU - Wolf, Michael S.

AU - Kannry, Joseph

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Objective: To test the impact of a redesigned, patient-centered after visit summary (AVS) on patients’ and clinicians’ ratings of and experience with the document. Methods: We conducted a difference-in-differences (DiD) evaluation of the impact of the redesigned AVS before and after its introduction in an academic primary care practice compared to a concurrent control practice. Outcomes included ratings of the features of the AVS. Results: The intervention site had 118 and 98 patients in the pre- and post-intervention periods and the control site had 99 and 105, respectively. In adjusted DiD analysis, introduction of the patient-centered AVS in the intervention site increased patient reports that the AVS was an effective reminder for taking medications (p =.004) and of receipt of the AVS from clinicians (p =.002). However, they were more likely to perceive it as too long (p =.04). There were no significant changes in overall rating of the AVS by clinicians or their likelihood of providing it to patients. Conclusions: A patient-centered AVS increased the number of patients receiving it and reporting that it would help them remember to take their medications. Practice implications: Improvements in the patient-centeredness of the AVS may improve its usefulness as a document to support self-management in primary care.

AB - Objective: To test the impact of a redesigned, patient-centered after visit summary (AVS) on patients’ and clinicians’ ratings of and experience with the document. Methods: We conducted a difference-in-differences (DiD) evaluation of the impact of the redesigned AVS before and after its introduction in an academic primary care practice compared to a concurrent control practice. Outcomes included ratings of the features of the AVS. Results: The intervention site had 118 and 98 patients in the pre- and post-intervention periods and the control site had 99 and 105, respectively. In adjusted DiD analysis, introduction of the patient-centered AVS in the intervention site increased patient reports that the AVS was an effective reminder for taking medications (p =.004) and of receipt of the AVS from clinicians (p =.002). However, they were more likely to perceive it as too long (p =.04). There were no significant changes in overall rating of the AVS by clinicians or their likelihood of providing it to patients. Conclusions: A patient-centered AVS increased the number of patients receiving it and reporting that it would help them remember to take their medications. Practice implications: Improvements in the patient-centeredness of the AVS may improve its usefulness as a document to support self-management in primary care.

KW - After visit summary

KW - Electronic health record (EHR)

KW - Health literacy

KW - Patient-Centered

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042845227&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042845227&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2018.02.017

DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2018.02.017

M3 - Article

C2 - 29525143

AN - SCOPUS:85042845227

JO - Patient Education and Counseling

JF - Patient Education and Counseling

SN - 0738-3991

ER -