Evaluation of a novel electronic genetic screening and clinical decision support tool in prenatal clinical settings

Emily A. Edelman, Bruce K. Lin, Teresa Doksum, Brian Drohan, Vaughn Edelson, Siobhan M. Dolan, Kevin Hughes, James O'Leary, Lisa Vasquez, Sara Copeland, Shelley L. Galvin, Nicole DeGroat, Setul Pardanani, W. Gregory Feero, Claire Adams, Renee Jones, Joan Scott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Pregnancy and Health Profile (PHP) is a free prenatal genetic screening and clinical decision support (CDS) software tool for prenatal providers. PHP collects family health history (FHH) during intake and provides point-of-care risk assessment for providers and education for patients. This pilot study evaluated patient and provider responses to PHP and effects of using PHP in practice. PHP was implemented in four clinics. Surveys assessed provider confidence and knowledge and patient and provider satisfaction with PHP. Data on the implementation process were obtained through semistructured interviews with administrators. Quantitative survey data were analyzed using Chi square test, Fisher's exact test, paired t tests, and multivariate logistic regression. Open-ended survey questions and interviews were analyzed using qualitative thematic analysis. Of the 83 % (513/618) of patients that provided feedback, 97 % felt PHP was easy to use and 98 % easy to understand. Thirty percent (21/71) of participating physicians completed both pre- and post-implementation feedback surveys [13 obstetricians (OBs) and 8 family medicine physicians (FPs)]. Confidence in managing genetic risks significantly improved for OBs on 2/6 measures (p values ≤0.001) but not for FPs. Physician knowledge did not significantly change. Providers reported value in added patient engagement and reported mixed feedback about the CDS report. We identified key steps, resources, and staff support required to implement PHP in a clinical setting. To our knowledge, this study is the first to report on the integration of patient-completed, electronically captured and CDSenabled FHH software into primary prenatal practice. PHP is acceptable to patients and providers. Key to successful implementation in the future will be customization options and interoperability with electronic health records.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1233-1245
Number of pages13
JournalMaternal and Child Health Journal
Volume18
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Clinical Decision Support Systems
Genetic Testing
Pregnancy
Health
Medical History Taking
Family Physicians
Software
Point-of-Care Systems
Medicine
Interviews
Physicians
Patient Participation
Electronic Health Records
Patient Education
Chi-Square Distribution
Administrative Personnel
Prenatal Diagnosis
Patient Satisfaction
Logistic Models

Keywords

  • Clinical decision support
  • Family health history
  • Genetic screening
  • Personalized risk assessment
  • Prenatal care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Epidemiology
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Evaluation of a novel electronic genetic screening and clinical decision support tool in prenatal clinical settings. / Edelman, Emily A.; Lin, Bruce K.; Doksum, Teresa; Drohan, Brian; Edelson, Vaughn; Dolan, Siobhan M.; Hughes, Kevin; O'Leary, James; Vasquez, Lisa; Copeland, Sara; Galvin, Shelley L.; DeGroat, Nicole; Pardanani, Setul; Feero, W. Gregory; Adams, Claire; Jones, Renee; Scott, Joan.

In: Maternal and Child Health Journal, Vol. 18, No. 5, 2014, p. 1233-1245.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Edelman, EA, Lin, BK, Doksum, T, Drohan, B, Edelson, V, Dolan, SM, Hughes, K, O'Leary, J, Vasquez, L, Copeland, S, Galvin, SL, DeGroat, N, Pardanani, S, Feero, WG, Adams, C, Jones, R & Scott, J 2014, 'Evaluation of a novel electronic genetic screening and clinical decision support tool in prenatal clinical settings', Maternal and Child Health Journal, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 1233-1245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-013-1358-y
Edelman, Emily A. ; Lin, Bruce K. ; Doksum, Teresa ; Drohan, Brian ; Edelson, Vaughn ; Dolan, Siobhan M. ; Hughes, Kevin ; O'Leary, James ; Vasquez, Lisa ; Copeland, Sara ; Galvin, Shelley L. ; DeGroat, Nicole ; Pardanani, Setul ; Feero, W. Gregory ; Adams, Claire ; Jones, Renee ; Scott, Joan. / Evaluation of a novel electronic genetic screening and clinical decision support tool in prenatal clinical settings. In: Maternal and Child Health Journal. 2014 ; Vol. 18, No. 5. pp. 1233-1245.
@article{daaaf8556bdc45bd882fd6ca25d1d595,
title = "Evaluation of a novel electronic genetic screening and clinical decision support tool in prenatal clinical settings",
abstract = "The Pregnancy and Health Profile (PHP) is a free prenatal genetic screening and clinical decision support (CDS) software tool for prenatal providers. PHP collects family health history (FHH) during intake and provides point-of-care risk assessment for providers and education for patients. This pilot study evaluated patient and provider responses to PHP and effects of using PHP in practice. PHP was implemented in four clinics. Surveys assessed provider confidence and knowledge and patient and provider satisfaction with PHP. Data on the implementation process were obtained through semistructured interviews with administrators. Quantitative survey data were analyzed using Chi square test, Fisher's exact test, paired t tests, and multivariate logistic regression. Open-ended survey questions and interviews were analyzed using qualitative thematic analysis. Of the 83 {\%} (513/618) of patients that provided feedback, 97 {\%} felt PHP was easy to use and 98 {\%} easy to understand. Thirty percent (21/71) of participating physicians completed both pre- and post-implementation feedback surveys [13 obstetricians (OBs) and 8 family medicine physicians (FPs)]. Confidence in managing genetic risks significantly improved for OBs on 2/6 measures (p values ≤0.001) but not for FPs. Physician knowledge did not significantly change. Providers reported value in added patient engagement and reported mixed feedback about the CDS report. We identified key steps, resources, and staff support required to implement PHP in a clinical setting. To our knowledge, this study is the first to report on the integration of patient-completed, electronically captured and CDSenabled FHH software into primary prenatal practice. PHP is acceptable to patients and providers. Key to successful implementation in the future will be customization options and interoperability with electronic health records.",
keywords = "Clinical decision support, Family health history, Genetic screening, Personalized risk assessment, Prenatal care",
author = "Edelman, {Emily A.} and Lin, {Bruce K.} and Teresa Doksum and Brian Drohan and Vaughn Edelson and Dolan, {Siobhan M.} and Kevin Hughes and James O'Leary and Lisa Vasquez and Sara Copeland and Galvin, {Shelley L.} and Nicole DeGroat and Setul Pardanani and Feero, {W. Gregory} and Claire Adams and Renee Jones and Joan Scott",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s10995-013-1358-y",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "1233--1245",
journal = "Maternal and Child Health Journal",
issn = "1092-7875",
publisher = "Springer GmbH & Co, Auslieferungs-Gesellschaf",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of a novel electronic genetic screening and clinical decision support tool in prenatal clinical settings

AU - Edelman, Emily A.

AU - Lin, Bruce K.

AU - Doksum, Teresa

AU - Drohan, Brian

AU - Edelson, Vaughn

AU - Dolan, Siobhan M.

AU - Hughes, Kevin

AU - O'Leary, James

AU - Vasquez, Lisa

AU - Copeland, Sara

AU - Galvin, Shelley L.

AU - DeGroat, Nicole

AU - Pardanani, Setul

AU - Feero, W. Gregory

AU - Adams, Claire

AU - Jones, Renee

AU - Scott, Joan

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The Pregnancy and Health Profile (PHP) is a free prenatal genetic screening and clinical decision support (CDS) software tool for prenatal providers. PHP collects family health history (FHH) during intake and provides point-of-care risk assessment for providers and education for patients. This pilot study evaluated patient and provider responses to PHP and effects of using PHP in practice. PHP was implemented in four clinics. Surveys assessed provider confidence and knowledge and patient and provider satisfaction with PHP. Data on the implementation process were obtained through semistructured interviews with administrators. Quantitative survey data were analyzed using Chi square test, Fisher's exact test, paired t tests, and multivariate logistic regression. Open-ended survey questions and interviews were analyzed using qualitative thematic analysis. Of the 83 % (513/618) of patients that provided feedback, 97 % felt PHP was easy to use and 98 % easy to understand. Thirty percent (21/71) of participating physicians completed both pre- and post-implementation feedback surveys [13 obstetricians (OBs) and 8 family medicine physicians (FPs)]. Confidence in managing genetic risks significantly improved for OBs on 2/6 measures (p values ≤0.001) but not for FPs. Physician knowledge did not significantly change. Providers reported value in added patient engagement and reported mixed feedback about the CDS report. We identified key steps, resources, and staff support required to implement PHP in a clinical setting. To our knowledge, this study is the first to report on the integration of patient-completed, electronically captured and CDSenabled FHH software into primary prenatal practice. PHP is acceptable to patients and providers. Key to successful implementation in the future will be customization options and interoperability with electronic health records.

AB - The Pregnancy and Health Profile (PHP) is a free prenatal genetic screening and clinical decision support (CDS) software tool for prenatal providers. PHP collects family health history (FHH) during intake and provides point-of-care risk assessment for providers and education for patients. This pilot study evaluated patient and provider responses to PHP and effects of using PHP in practice. PHP was implemented in four clinics. Surveys assessed provider confidence and knowledge and patient and provider satisfaction with PHP. Data on the implementation process were obtained through semistructured interviews with administrators. Quantitative survey data were analyzed using Chi square test, Fisher's exact test, paired t tests, and multivariate logistic regression. Open-ended survey questions and interviews were analyzed using qualitative thematic analysis. Of the 83 % (513/618) of patients that provided feedback, 97 % felt PHP was easy to use and 98 % easy to understand. Thirty percent (21/71) of participating physicians completed both pre- and post-implementation feedback surveys [13 obstetricians (OBs) and 8 family medicine physicians (FPs)]. Confidence in managing genetic risks significantly improved for OBs on 2/6 measures (p values ≤0.001) but not for FPs. Physician knowledge did not significantly change. Providers reported value in added patient engagement and reported mixed feedback about the CDS report. We identified key steps, resources, and staff support required to implement PHP in a clinical setting. To our knowledge, this study is the first to report on the integration of patient-completed, electronically captured and CDSenabled FHH software into primary prenatal practice. PHP is acceptable to patients and providers. Key to successful implementation in the future will be customization options and interoperability with electronic health records.

KW - Clinical decision support

KW - Family health history

KW - Genetic screening

KW - Personalized risk assessment

KW - Prenatal care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904440804&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904440804&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10995-013-1358-y

DO - 10.1007/s10995-013-1358-y

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 1233

EP - 1245

JO - Maternal and Child Health Journal

JF - Maternal and Child Health Journal

SN - 1092-7875

IS - 5

ER -