Evaluation and the NIH Clinical and Translational Science Awards: A "Top Ten" List

Harold Alan Pincus, Zainab Abedin, Arthur E. Blank, Paul E. Mazmanian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since 2006, a total of 61 Clinical and Translational Science Institutes (CTSAs) have been funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), with the aim of reducing translation time from a bench discovery to when it impacts patients. This special issue of Evaluation & the Health Professions focuses on evaluation within and across the large, complex system of the CTSA Program of NIH. Through insights gained by reading the articles in this special edition and the experience of the authors, a "top ten" list of lessons learned and insights gained is presented. The list outlines issues that face those who evaluate the influence of the CTSA Program, as they work to anticipate what will be needed for continuing success. Themes include (1) considering the needs of stakeholders, (2) the perspective of the evaluators, (3) the importance of service improvement, (4) the importance of teams and people, (5) costs and return on investments, (6) methodology considerations to evaluate the CTSA enterprise, (7) innovation in evaluation, (8) defining the transformation of research, (9) evaluating the long-term impact of the CTSAs on public health, and (10) contributing to science policy formulation and implementation. The establishment of the CTSA Program, with its mandated evaluation component, has not only influenced the infrastructure and nature of translational research but will continue to impact policy and management in science.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)411-431
Number of pages21
JournalEvaluation and the Health Professions
Volume36
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Health Occupations
Translational Medical Research
Reading
Public Health
Costs and Cost Analysis
Research

Keywords

  • CTSA
  • evaluation
  • evaluation methods
  • quality improvement
  • science policy
  • team science
  • transformation
  • translational research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Evaluation and the NIH Clinical and Translational Science Awards : A "Top Ten" List. / Pincus, Harold Alan; Abedin, Zainab; Blank, Arthur E.; Mazmanian, Paul E.

In: Evaluation and the Health Professions, Vol. 36, No. 4, 12.2013, p. 411-431.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pincus, Harold Alan ; Abedin, Zainab ; Blank, Arthur E. ; Mazmanian, Paul E. / Evaluation and the NIH Clinical and Translational Science Awards : A "Top Ten" List. In: Evaluation and the Health Professions. 2013 ; Vol. 36, No. 4. pp. 411-431.
@article{7d4663de7d1d436598756e0bcd99393f,
title = "Evaluation and the NIH Clinical and Translational Science Awards: A {"}Top Ten{"} List",
abstract = "Since 2006, a total of 61 Clinical and Translational Science Institutes (CTSAs) have been funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), with the aim of reducing translation time from a bench discovery to when it impacts patients. This special issue of Evaluation & the Health Professions focuses on evaluation within and across the large, complex system of the CTSA Program of NIH. Through insights gained by reading the articles in this special edition and the experience of the authors, a {"}top ten{"} list of lessons learned and insights gained is presented. The list outlines issues that face those who evaluate the influence of the CTSA Program, as they work to anticipate what will be needed for continuing success. Themes include (1) considering the needs of stakeholders, (2) the perspective of the evaluators, (3) the importance of service improvement, (4) the importance of teams and people, (5) costs and return on investments, (6) methodology considerations to evaluate the CTSA enterprise, (7) innovation in evaluation, (8) defining the transformation of research, (9) evaluating the long-term impact of the CTSAs on public health, and (10) contributing to science policy formulation and implementation. The establishment of the CTSA Program, with its mandated evaluation component, has not only influenced the infrastructure and nature of translational research but will continue to impact policy and management in science.",
keywords = "CTSA, evaluation, evaluation methods, quality improvement, science policy, team science, transformation, translational research",
author = "Pincus, {Harold Alan} and Zainab Abedin and Blank, {Arthur E.} and Mazmanian, {Paul E.}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1177/0163278713507061",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "411--431",
journal = "Evaluation and the Health Professions",
issn = "0163-2787",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation and the NIH Clinical and Translational Science Awards

T2 - A "Top Ten" List

AU - Pincus, Harold Alan

AU - Abedin, Zainab

AU - Blank, Arthur E.

AU - Mazmanian, Paul E.

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - Since 2006, a total of 61 Clinical and Translational Science Institutes (CTSAs) have been funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), with the aim of reducing translation time from a bench discovery to when it impacts patients. This special issue of Evaluation & the Health Professions focuses on evaluation within and across the large, complex system of the CTSA Program of NIH. Through insights gained by reading the articles in this special edition and the experience of the authors, a "top ten" list of lessons learned and insights gained is presented. The list outlines issues that face those who evaluate the influence of the CTSA Program, as they work to anticipate what will be needed for continuing success. Themes include (1) considering the needs of stakeholders, (2) the perspective of the evaluators, (3) the importance of service improvement, (4) the importance of teams and people, (5) costs and return on investments, (6) methodology considerations to evaluate the CTSA enterprise, (7) innovation in evaluation, (8) defining the transformation of research, (9) evaluating the long-term impact of the CTSAs on public health, and (10) contributing to science policy formulation and implementation. The establishment of the CTSA Program, with its mandated evaluation component, has not only influenced the infrastructure and nature of translational research but will continue to impact policy and management in science.

AB - Since 2006, a total of 61 Clinical and Translational Science Institutes (CTSAs) have been funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), with the aim of reducing translation time from a bench discovery to when it impacts patients. This special issue of Evaluation & the Health Professions focuses on evaluation within and across the large, complex system of the CTSA Program of NIH. Through insights gained by reading the articles in this special edition and the experience of the authors, a "top ten" list of lessons learned and insights gained is presented. The list outlines issues that face those who evaluate the influence of the CTSA Program, as they work to anticipate what will be needed for continuing success. Themes include (1) considering the needs of stakeholders, (2) the perspective of the evaluators, (3) the importance of service improvement, (4) the importance of teams and people, (5) costs and return on investments, (6) methodology considerations to evaluate the CTSA enterprise, (7) innovation in evaluation, (8) defining the transformation of research, (9) evaluating the long-term impact of the CTSAs on public health, and (10) contributing to science policy formulation and implementation. The establishment of the CTSA Program, with its mandated evaluation component, has not only influenced the infrastructure and nature of translational research but will continue to impact policy and management in science.

KW - CTSA

KW - evaluation

KW - evaluation methods

KW - quality improvement

KW - science policy

KW - team science

KW - transformation

KW - translational research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887439828&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887439828&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0163278713507061

DO - 10.1177/0163278713507061

M3 - Article

C2 - 24214661

AN - SCOPUS:84887439828

VL - 36

SP - 411

EP - 431

JO - Evaluation and the Health Professions

JF - Evaluation and the Health Professions

SN - 0163-2787

IS - 4

ER -