Ethical issues in the use of anencephalic infants as organ donors

Shlomo Shinnar, J. Arras

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For many, the ethical issues raised in the previous sections are sufficient to justify opposition to tampering with either the dead-donor rule or the definition of death in general and the use of anencephalic infants as organ donors in particular regardless of how many organs could be procured. Others will see it as a question of balancing the relative costs and benefits of the proposal. Given the likely bad consequences and meager benefits, these protocols are difficult to justify on those grounds as well. The proposals of waiting until brain death has occurred also pose some serious, though not necessarily insurmountable, ethical problems. With supportive care, however, anencephalic infants do not become brain dead in the first week of life. Given the declining incidence of anencephaly, the issue regarding anencephalic infants will probably become moot in the next few years. As the need for organ donors continues to grow, we will undoubtedly be faced with future proposals to harvest vital organs from other 'unique' categories of dying or severely impaired patients. We believe that the current dead donor rule and the strict 'whole-brain' definition of death are sound public policy and good ethics and should remain the cornerstone of future decisions in this field.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)729-743
Number of pages15
JournalNeurologic Clinics
Volume7
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1989

Fingerprint

Ethics
Brain Death
Tissue Donors
Anencephaly
Public Policy
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Ethical issues in the use of anencephalic infants as organ donors. / Shinnar, Shlomo; Arras, J.

In: Neurologic Clinics, Vol. 7, No. 4, 1989, p. 729-743.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2bdd99f719a84510ac464268695e9bcc,
title = "Ethical issues in the use of anencephalic infants as organ donors",
abstract = "For many, the ethical issues raised in the previous sections are sufficient to justify opposition to tampering with either the dead-donor rule or the definition of death in general and the use of anencephalic infants as organ donors in particular regardless of how many organs could be procured. Others will see it as a question of balancing the relative costs and benefits of the proposal. Given the likely bad consequences and meager benefits, these protocols are difficult to justify on those grounds as well. The proposals of waiting until brain death has occurred also pose some serious, though not necessarily insurmountable, ethical problems. With supportive care, however, anencephalic infants do not become brain dead in the first week of life. Given the declining incidence of anencephaly, the issue regarding anencephalic infants will probably become moot in the next few years. As the need for organ donors continues to grow, we will undoubtedly be faced with future proposals to harvest vital organs from other 'unique' categories of dying or severely impaired patients. We believe that the current dead donor rule and the strict 'whole-brain' definition of death are sound public policy and good ethics and should remain the cornerstone of future decisions in this field.",
author = "Shlomo Shinnar and J. Arras",
year = "1989",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "729--743",
journal = "Neurologic Clinics",
issn = "0733-8619",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethical issues in the use of anencephalic infants as organ donors

AU - Shinnar, Shlomo

AU - Arras, J.

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - For many, the ethical issues raised in the previous sections are sufficient to justify opposition to tampering with either the dead-donor rule or the definition of death in general and the use of anencephalic infants as organ donors in particular regardless of how many organs could be procured. Others will see it as a question of balancing the relative costs and benefits of the proposal. Given the likely bad consequences and meager benefits, these protocols are difficult to justify on those grounds as well. The proposals of waiting until brain death has occurred also pose some serious, though not necessarily insurmountable, ethical problems. With supportive care, however, anencephalic infants do not become brain dead in the first week of life. Given the declining incidence of anencephaly, the issue regarding anencephalic infants will probably become moot in the next few years. As the need for organ donors continues to grow, we will undoubtedly be faced with future proposals to harvest vital organs from other 'unique' categories of dying or severely impaired patients. We believe that the current dead donor rule and the strict 'whole-brain' definition of death are sound public policy and good ethics and should remain the cornerstone of future decisions in this field.

AB - For many, the ethical issues raised in the previous sections are sufficient to justify opposition to tampering with either the dead-donor rule or the definition of death in general and the use of anencephalic infants as organ donors in particular regardless of how many organs could be procured. Others will see it as a question of balancing the relative costs and benefits of the proposal. Given the likely bad consequences and meager benefits, these protocols are difficult to justify on those grounds as well. The proposals of waiting until brain death has occurred also pose some serious, though not necessarily insurmountable, ethical problems. With supportive care, however, anencephalic infants do not become brain dead in the first week of life. Given the declining incidence of anencephaly, the issue regarding anencephalic infants will probably become moot in the next few years. As the need for organ donors continues to grow, we will undoubtedly be faced with future proposals to harvest vital organs from other 'unique' categories of dying or severely impaired patients. We believe that the current dead donor rule and the strict 'whole-brain' definition of death are sound public policy and good ethics and should remain the cornerstone of future decisions in this field.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024428332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024428332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2586397

AN - SCOPUS:0024428332

VL - 7

SP - 729

EP - 743

JO - Neurologic Clinics

JF - Neurologic Clinics

SN - 0733-8619

IS - 4

ER -