Ethical aspects, expectations, and outcomes associated with PEG in dementia

Thiruvinvamalai S. Dharmarajan, Krishna P. Aparanji, C. S. Pitchumoni

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes are often placed as a means of feeding patients with terminal dementia who eat poorly. The decision to place a PEG involves ethical dilemmas and has become controversial, as data demonstrate that PEGs do not improve life expectancy, quality of life, or nutritional status in dementia, nor has it reduced the tendency to aspirate or heal pressure ulcers. Often, PEGs are placed prior to full evaluation for reversible factors. A multidisciplinary approach to evaluate the patient for reversible factors and alternate means of feeding should be utilized along with a meaningful discussion with the caregiver prior to using PEGs as a last resort. Undue expectations should not be put forth; a reasonable understanding of the process and outcomes by the providers and caregiver would be in the best interests of the patient.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationGeriatric Gastroenterology
PublisherSpringer New York
Pages137-144
Number of pages8
ISBN (Print)9781441916235, 9781441916228
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2012

Fingerprint

Gastrostomy
Dementia
Caregivers
Quality of Life
Pressure Ulcer
Life Expectancy
Nutritional Status

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Dharmarajan, T. S., Aparanji, K. P., & Pitchumoni, C. S. (2012). Ethical aspects, expectations, and outcomes associated with PEG in dementia. In Geriatric Gastroenterology (pp. 137-144). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1623-5_15

Ethical aspects, expectations, and outcomes associated with PEG in dementia. / Dharmarajan, Thiruvinvamalai S.; Aparanji, Krishna P.; Pitchumoni, C. S.

Geriatric Gastroenterology. Springer New York, 2012. p. 137-144.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Dharmarajan, TS, Aparanji, KP & Pitchumoni, CS 2012, Ethical aspects, expectations, and outcomes associated with PEG in dementia. in Geriatric Gastroenterology. Springer New York, pp. 137-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1623-5_15
Dharmarajan TS, Aparanji KP, Pitchumoni CS. Ethical aspects, expectations, and outcomes associated with PEG in dementia. In Geriatric Gastroenterology. Springer New York. 2012. p. 137-144 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1623-5_15
Dharmarajan, Thiruvinvamalai S. ; Aparanji, Krishna P. ; Pitchumoni, C. S. / Ethical aspects, expectations, and outcomes associated with PEG in dementia. Geriatric Gastroenterology. Springer New York, 2012. pp. 137-144
@inbook{2351e66856b54196b5bb5b1fe9e7a647,
title = "Ethical aspects, expectations, and outcomes associated with PEG in dementia",
abstract = "Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes are often placed as a means of feeding patients with terminal dementia who eat poorly. The decision to place a PEG involves ethical dilemmas and has become controversial, as data demonstrate that PEGs do not improve life expectancy, quality of life, or nutritional status in dementia, nor has it reduced the tendency to aspirate or heal pressure ulcers. Often, PEGs are placed prior to full evaluation for reversible factors. A multidisciplinary approach to evaluate the patient for reversible factors and alternate means of feeding should be utilized along with a meaningful discussion with the caregiver prior to using PEGs as a last resort. Undue expectations should not be put forth; a reasonable understanding of the process and outcomes by the providers and caregiver would be in the best interests of the patient.",
author = "Dharmarajan, {Thiruvinvamalai S.} and Aparanji, {Krishna P.} and Pitchumoni, {C. S.}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-1-4419-1623-5_15",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781441916235",
pages = "137--144",
booktitle = "Geriatric Gastroenterology",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Ethical aspects, expectations, and outcomes associated with PEG in dementia

AU - Dharmarajan, Thiruvinvamalai S.

AU - Aparanji, Krishna P.

AU - Pitchumoni, C. S.

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes are often placed as a means of feeding patients with terminal dementia who eat poorly. The decision to place a PEG involves ethical dilemmas and has become controversial, as data demonstrate that PEGs do not improve life expectancy, quality of life, or nutritional status in dementia, nor has it reduced the tendency to aspirate or heal pressure ulcers. Often, PEGs are placed prior to full evaluation for reversible factors. A multidisciplinary approach to evaluate the patient for reversible factors and alternate means of feeding should be utilized along with a meaningful discussion with the caregiver prior to using PEGs as a last resort. Undue expectations should not be put forth; a reasonable understanding of the process and outcomes by the providers and caregiver would be in the best interests of the patient.

AB - Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes are often placed as a means of feeding patients with terminal dementia who eat poorly. The decision to place a PEG involves ethical dilemmas and has become controversial, as data demonstrate that PEGs do not improve life expectancy, quality of life, or nutritional status in dementia, nor has it reduced the tendency to aspirate or heal pressure ulcers. Often, PEGs are placed prior to full evaluation for reversible factors. A multidisciplinary approach to evaluate the patient for reversible factors and alternate means of feeding should be utilized along with a meaningful discussion with the caregiver prior to using PEGs as a last resort. Undue expectations should not be put forth; a reasonable understanding of the process and outcomes by the providers and caregiver would be in the best interests of the patient.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955724291&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955724291&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-1-4419-1623-5_15

DO - 10.1007/978-1-4419-1623-5_15

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781441916235

SN - 9781441916228

SP - 137

EP - 144

BT - Geriatric Gastroenterology

PB - Springer New York

ER -