Employer Requirements to Work during Emergency Responses: Key Ethics Considerations

Lainie Rutkow, Holly A. Taylor, Patricia (Tia) Powell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Local health departments and their employees are at the forefront of emergency preparedness and response. Yet, recent studies have found that some local public health workers are unwilling to report to work in a variety of disaster scenarios. This can greatly compromise a response, as many local health departments need "all hands on deck" to effectively meet increased demands. To address these concerns, local health departments have employed varied policy strategies to ensure that employees do report to work. After describing different approaches taken by local health departments throughout the United States, we briefly identify and explore key ethics considerations that arise for local health departments when employees are required to report to work for emergency responses. We then discuss how these ethics considerations may inform local health department practices intended to promote a robust emergency response.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)73-76
Number of pages4
JournalThe Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics
Volume45
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017

Fingerprint

Ethics
Emergencies
Health
Civil Defense
United States Dept. of Health and Human Services
Disasters
Hand
Public Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Health Policy

Cite this

@article{cb73feaf559f432786314746313b0965,
title = "Employer Requirements to Work during Emergency Responses: Key Ethics Considerations",
abstract = "Local health departments and their employees are at the forefront of emergency preparedness and response. Yet, recent studies have found that some local public health workers are unwilling to report to work in a variety of disaster scenarios. This can greatly compromise a response, as many local health departments need {"}all hands on deck{"} to effectively meet increased demands. To address these concerns, local health departments have employed varied policy strategies to ensure that employees do report to work. After describing different approaches taken by local health departments throughout the United States, we briefly identify and explore key ethics considerations that arise for local health departments when employees are required to report to work for emergency responses. We then discuss how these ethics considerations may inform local health department practices intended to promote a robust emergency response.",
author = "Lainie Rutkow and Taylor, {Holly A.} and Powell, {Patricia (Tia)}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1073110517703330",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "73--76",
journal = "Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics",
issn = "1073-1105",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Employer Requirements to Work during Emergency Responses

T2 - Key Ethics Considerations

AU - Rutkow, Lainie

AU - Taylor, Holly A.

AU - Powell, Patricia (Tia)

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Local health departments and their employees are at the forefront of emergency preparedness and response. Yet, recent studies have found that some local public health workers are unwilling to report to work in a variety of disaster scenarios. This can greatly compromise a response, as many local health departments need "all hands on deck" to effectively meet increased demands. To address these concerns, local health departments have employed varied policy strategies to ensure that employees do report to work. After describing different approaches taken by local health departments throughout the United States, we briefly identify and explore key ethics considerations that arise for local health departments when employees are required to report to work for emergency responses. We then discuss how these ethics considerations may inform local health department practices intended to promote a robust emergency response.

AB - Local health departments and their employees are at the forefront of emergency preparedness and response. Yet, recent studies have found that some local public health workers are unwilling to report to work in a variety of disaster scenarios. This can greatly compromise a response, as many local health departments need "all hands on deck" to effectively meet increased demands. To address these concerns, local health departments have employed varied policy strategies to ensure that employees do report to work. After describing different approaches taken by local health departments throughout the United States, we briefly identify and explore key ethics considerations that arise for local health departments when employees are required to report to work for emergency responses. We then discuss how these ethics considerations may inform local health department practices intended to promote a robust emergency response.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042639634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042639634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1073110517703330

DO - 10.1177/1073110517703330

M3 - Article

C2 - 28661290

AN - SCOPUS:85042639634

VL - 45

SP - 73

EP - 76

JO - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics

JF - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics

SN - 1073-1105

IS - 1

ER -