Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: Experience at a community teaching hospital

Elana S. Kastner, Reinaldo Figueroa, David Garry, Dev Maulik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

168 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the incidence, indications, risk factors, and complications associated with emergency peripartum hysterectomy at a community-based academic medical center. METHODS: We analyzed retrospectively 47 of 48 cases of emergency peripartum hysterectomy performed at Winthrop-University Hospital from 1991 to 1997. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy was defined as one performed for hemorrhage unresponsive to other treatment less than 24 hours after delivery. Fisher exact test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, and Cochran-Armitage exact trend test were used for analysis. RESULTS: There were 48 emergency peripartum hysterectomies among 34,241 deliveries for a rate of 1.4 per 1000. Most frequent indications were placenta accreta (48.9%, 12 with previa, 11 without previa), uterine atony (29.8%), previa without accreta (8.5%), and uterine laceration (4.3%). Placenta accreta was the most common indication in multiparous women (58.8%, 20 of 34), uterine atony the most common in primiparas (69.2%, nine of 13). Twenty-two of 23 (95.6%) women with placenta accreta had a previous cesarean delivery or curettage. The number of cesarean deliveries or curettages increased the risk of placenta accreta proportionally. Thirty-eight (80.9%) of the hysterectomies were subtotal. Postoperative febrile morbidity was 34%; other morbidity was 26.3%. CONCLUSION: Placenta accreta has become the most common indication for emergency peripartum hysterectomy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)971-975
Number of pages5
JournalObstetrics and gynecology
Volume99
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 22 2002

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this