Electrotherapy for acceleration of wound healing: Low intensity direct current

P. J. Carley, Stanley F. Wainapel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

147 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Accelerated wound healing has been an observed effect of low intensity direct current (LIDC) in the range of 200 μA to 800 μA, but present electrotherapeutic equipment has been less than optimal in providing this range of stimulation. A small and portable LIDC stimulator was specially constructed and used in a study of the effects of LIDC on wound healing rates among inpatients here. Thirty patients with indolent ulcers located either below the knee or in the sacral area were randomly assigned to the LIDC protocol or to more conventional wound therapy. The patients in each treatment group were matched by age, diagnosis, wound size, and wound etiology. Comparison revealed 1.5 to 2.5 times faster healing in those receiving LIDC, which was statistically significant. The wounds treated with LIDC required less debridement and the healed scars were more resilient. Additionally, no wound infections occurred and patients reported less discomfort at the wound site. Low intensity direct current appears to be a convenient, reproducible, and effective method for improved healing of chronic open wounds and warrants more widespread use in the clinical setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)443-446
Number of pages4
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume66
Issue number7
StatePublished - 1985
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Electric Stimulation Therapy
Wound Healing
Wounds and Injuries
Debridement
Wound Infection
Ulcer
Cicatrix
Inpatients
Knee
Research Design
Equipment and Supplies
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Electrotherapy for acceleration of wound healing : Low intensity direct current. / Carley, P. J.; Wainapel, Stanley F.

In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 66, No. 7, 1985, p. 443-446.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a37374240b624a9b9780880858680a5a,
title = "Electrotherapy for acceleration of wound healing: Low intensity direct current",
abstract = "Accelerated wound healing has been an observed effect of low intensity direct current (LIDC) in the range of 200 μA to 800 μA, but present electrotherapeutic equipment has been less than optimal in providing this range of stimulation. A small and portable LIDC stimulator was specially constructed and used in a study of the effects of LIDC on wound healing rates among inpatients here. Thirty patients with indolent ulcers located either below the knee or in the sacral area were randomly assigned to the LIDC protocol or to more conventional wound therapy. The patients in each treatment group were matched by age, diagnosis, wound size, and wound etiology. Comparison revealed 1.5 to 2.5 times faster healing in those receiving LIDC, which was statistically significant. The wounds treated with LIDC required less debridement and the healed scars were more resilient. Additionally, no wound infections occurred and patients reported less discomfort at the wound site. Low intensity direct current appears to be a convenient, reproducible, and effective method for improved healing of chronic open wounds and warrants more widespread use in the clinical setting.",
author = "Carley, {P. J.} and Wainapel, {Stanley F.}",
year = "1985",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "66",
pages = "443--446",
journal = "Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0003-9993",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electrotherapy for acceleration of wound healing

T2 - Low intensity direct current

AU - Carley, P. J.

AU - Wainapel, Stanley F.

PY - 1985

Y1 - 1985

N2 - Accelerated wound healing has been an observed effect of low intensity direct current (LIDC) in the range of 200 μA to 800 μA, but present electrotherapeutic equipment has been less than optimal in providing this range of stimulation. A small and portable LIDC stimulator was specially constructed and used in a study of the effects of LIDC on wound healing rates among inpatients here. Thirty patients with indolent ulcers located either below the knee or in the sacral area were randomly assigned to the LIDC protocol or to more conventional wound therapy. The patients in each treatment group were matched by age, diagnosis, wound size, and wound etiology. Comparison revealed 1.5 to 2.5 times faster healing in those receiving LIDC, which was statistically significant. The wounds treated with LIDC required less debridement and the healed scars were more resilient. Additionally, no wound infections occurred and patients reported less discomfort at the wound site. Low intensity direct current appears to be a convenient, reproducible, and effective method for improved healing of chronic open wounds and warrants more widespread use in the clinical setting.

AB - Accelerated wound healing has been an observed effect of low intensity direct current (LIDC) in the range of 200 μA to 800 μA, but present electrotherapeutic equipment has been less than optimal in providing this range of stimulation. A small and portable LIDC stimulator was specially constructed and used in a study of the effects of LIDC on wound healing rates among inpatients here. Thirty patients with indolent ulcers located either below the knee or in the sacral area were randomly assigned to the LIDC protocol or to more conventional wound therapy. The patients in each treatment group were matched by age, diagnosis, wound size, and wound etiology. Comparison revealed 1.5 to 2.5 times faster healing in those receiving LIDC, which was statistically significant. The wounds treated with LIDC required less debridement and the healed scars were more resilient. Additionally, no wound infections occurred and patients reported less discomfort at the wound site. Low intensity direct current appears to be a convenient, reproducible, and effective method for improved healing of chronic open wounds and warrants more widespread use in the clinical setting.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021823711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021823711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 3893385

AN - SCOPUS:0021823711

VL - 66

SP - 443

EP - 446

JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0003-9993

IS - 7

ER -