Electronic behavioral interventions for headache: a systematic review

Mia Tova Minen, John Torous, Jenelle Raynowska, Allison Piazza, Corita Grudzen, Scott Powers, Richard B. Lipton, Mary Ann Sevick

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There is increasing interest in using electronic behavioral interventions as well as mobile technologies such as smartphones for improving the care of chronic disabling diseases such as migraines. However, less is known about the current clinical evidence for the feasibility and effectiveness of such behavioral interventions. Objective: To review the published literature of behavioral interventions for primary headache disorders delivered by electronic means suitable for use outside of the clinician’s office. Methods: An electronic database search of PubMed, PsycINFO, and Embase was conducted through December 11, 2015. All eligible studies were systematically reviewed to examine the modality in which treatment was delivered (computer, smartphone, watch and other), types of behavioral intervention delivered (cognitive behavioral therapy [CBT], biofeedback, relaxation, other), the headache type being treated, duration of treatment, adherence, and outcomes obtained by the trials to examine the overall feasibility of electronic behavioral interventions for headache. Results: Our search produced 291 results from which 23 eligible articles were identified. Fourteen studies used the internet via the computer, 2 used Personal Digital Assistants, 2 used CD ROM and 5 used other types of devices. None used smartphones or wearable devices. Four were pilot studies (N ≤ 10) which assessed feasibility. For the behavioral intervention, CBT was used in 11 (48 %) of the studies, relaxation was used in 8 (35 %) of the studies, and biofeedback was used in 5 (22 %) of the studies. The majority of studies (14/23, 61 %) used more than one type of behavioral modality. The duration of therapy ranged from 4–8 weeks for CBT with a mean of 5.9 weeks. The duration of other behavioral interventions ranged from 4 days to 60 months. Outcomes measured varied widely across the individual studies. Conclusions: Despite the move toward individualized medicine and mHealth, the current literature shows that most studies using electronic behavioral intervention for the treatment of headache did not use mobile devices. The studies examining mobile devices showed that the behavioral interventions that employed them were acceptable to patients. Data are limited on the dose required, long term efficacy, and issues related to the security and privacy of this health data. This study was registered at the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42015032284) (Prospero, 2015).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number51
JournalJournal of Headache and Pain
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

Fingerprint

Headache
Cognitive Therapy
Equipment and Supplies
CD-ROM
Primary Headache Disorders
Handheld Computers
Precision Medicine
Telemedicine
Privacy
Migraine Disorders
PubMed
Internet
Chronic Disease
Therapeutics
Databases
Technology
Health
Smartphone
Biofeedback (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Behavioral medicine
  • Biofeedback
  • Cognitive behavioral therapy
  • Electronic
  • Headache
  • Migraine
  • Progressive muscle relaxation therapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Minen, M. T., Torous, J., Raynowska, J., Piazza, A., Grudzen, C., Powers, S., ... Sevick, M. A. (2016). Electronic behavioral interventions for headache: a systematic review. Journal of Headache and Pain, 17(1), [51]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-016-0608-y

Electronic behavioral interventions for headache : a systematic review. / Minen, Mia Tova; Torous, John; Raynowska, Jenelle; Piazza, Allison; Grudzen, Corita; Powers, Scott; Lipton, Richard B.; Sevick, Mary Ann.

In: Journal of Headache and Pain, Vol. 17, No. 1, 51, 01.12.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Minen, MT, Torous, J, Raynowska, J, Piazza, A, Grudzen, C, Powers, S, Lipton, RB & Sevick, MA 2016, 'Electronic behavioral interventions for headache: a systematic review', Journal of Headache and Pain, vol. 17, no. 1, 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-016-0608-y
Minen MT, Torous J, Raynowska J, Piazza A, Grudzen C, Powers S et al. Electronic behavioral interventions for headache: a systematic review. Journal of Headache and Pain. 2016 Dec 1;17(1). 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-016-0608-y
Minen, Mia Tova ; Torous, John ; Raynowska, Jenelle ; Piazza, Allison ; Grudzen, Corita ; Powers, Scott ; Lipton, Richard B. ; Sevick, Mary Ann. / Electronic behavioral interventions for headache : a systematic review. In: Journal of Headache and Pain. 2016 ; Vol. 17, No. 1.
@article{c29ed362d105493d9470d97af717e90d,
title = "Electronic behavioral interventions for headache: a systematic review",
abstract = "Background: There is increasing interest in using electronic behavioral interventions as well as mobile technologies such as smartphones for improving the care of chronic disabling diseases such as migraines. However, less is known about the current clinical evidence for the feasibility and effectiveness of such behavioral interventions. Objective: To review the published literature of behavioral interventions for primary headache disorders delivered by electronic means suitable for use outside of the clinician’s office. Methods: An electronic database search of PubMed, PsycINFO, and Embase was conducted through December 11, 2015. All eligible studies were systematically reviewed to examine the modality in which treatment was delivered (computer, smartphone, watch and other), types of behavioral intervention delivered (cognitive behavioral therapy [CBT], biofeedback, relaxation, other), the headache type being treated, duration of treatment, adherence, and outcomes obtained by the trials to examine the overall feasibility of electronic behavioral interventions for headache. Results: Our search produced 291 results from which 23 eligible articles were identified. Fourteen studies used the internet via the computer, 2 used Personal Digital Assistants, 2 used CD ROM and 5 used other types of devices. None used smartphones or wearable devices. Four were pilot studies (N ≤ 10) which assessed feasibility. For the behavioral intervention, CBT was used in 11 (48 {\%}) of the studies, relaxation was used in 8 (35 {\%}) of the studies, and biofeedback was used in 5 (22 {\%}) of the studies. The majority of studies (14/23, 61 {\%}) used more than one type of behavioral modality. The duration of therapy ranged from 4–8 weeks for CBT with a mean of 5.9 weeks. The duration of other behavioral interventions ranged from 4 days to 60 months. Outcomes measured varied widely across the individual studies. Conclusions: Despite the move toward individualized medicine and mHealth, the current literature shows that most studies using electronic behavioral intervention for the treatment of headache did not use mobile devices. The studies examining mobile devices showed that the behavioral interventions that employed them were acceptable to patients. Data are limited on the dose required, long term efficacy, and issues related to the security and privacy of this health data. This study was registered at the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42015032284) (Prospero, 2015).",
keywords = "Behavioral medicine, Biofeedback, Cognitive behavioral therapy, Electronic, Headache, Migraine, Progressive muscle relaxation therapy",
author = "Minen, {Mia Tova} and John Torous and Jenelle Raynowska and Allison Piazza and Corita Grudzen and Scott Powers and Lipton, {Richard B.} and Sevick, {Mary Ann}",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1186/s10194-016-0608-y",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
journal = "The journal of headache and pain",
issn = "1129-2369",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag Italia",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electronic behavioral interventions for headache

T2 - a systematic review

AU - Minen, Mia Tova

AU - Torous, John

AU - Raynowska, Jenelle

AU - Piazza, Allison

AU - Grudzen, Corita

AU - Powers, Scott

AU - Lipton, Richard B.

AU - Sevick, Mary Ann

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - Background: There is increasing interest in using electronic behavioral interventions as well as mobile technologies such as smartphones for improving the care of chronic disabling diseases such as migraines. However, less is known about the current clinical evidence for the feasibility and effectiveness of such behavioral interventions. Objective: To review the published literature of behavioral interventions for primary headache disorders delivered by electronic means suitable for use outside of the clinician’s office. Methods: An electronic database search of PubMed, PsycINFO, and Embase was conducted through December 11, 2015. All eligible studies were systematically reviewed to examine the modality in which treatment was delivered (computer, smartphone, watch and other), types of behavioral intervention delivered (cognitive behavioral therapy [CBT], biofeedback, relaxation, other), the headache type being treated, duration of treatment, adherence, and outcomes obtained by the trials to examine the overall feasibility of electronic behavioral interventions for headache. Results: Our search produced 291 results from which 23 eligible articles were identified. Fourteen studies used the internet via the computer, 2 used Personal Digital Assistants, 2 used CD ROM and 5 used other types of devices. None used smartphones or wearable devices. Four were pilot studies (N ≤ 10) which assessed feasibility. For the behavioral intervention, CBT was used in 11 (48 %) of the studies, relaxation was used in 8 (35 %) of the studies, and biofeedback was used in 5 (22 %) of the studies. The majority of studies (14/23, 61 %) used more than one type of behavioral modality. The duration of therapy ranged from 4–8 weeks for CBT with a mean of 5.9 weeks. The duration of other behavioral interventions ranged from 4 days to 60 months. Outcomes measured varied widely across the individual studies. Conclusions: Despite the move toward individualized medicine and mHealth, the current literature shows that most studies using electronic behavioral intervention for the treatment of headache did not use mobile devices. The studies examining mobile devices showed that the behavioral interventions that employed them were acceptable to patients. Data are limited on the dose required, long term efficacy, and issues related to the security and privacy of this health data. This study was registered at the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42015032284) (Prospero, 2015).

AB - Background: There is increasing interest in using electronic behavioral interventions as well as mobile technologies such as smartphones for improving the care of chronic disabling diseases such as migraines. However, less is known about the current clinical evidence for the feasibility and effectiveness of such behavioral interventions. Objective: To review the published literature of behavioral interventions for primary headache disorders delivered by electronic means suitable for use outside of the clinician’s office. Methods: An electronic database search of PubMed, PsycINFO, and Embase was conducted through December 11, 2015. All eligible studies were systematically reviewed to examine the modality in which treatment was delivered (computer, smartphone, watch and other), types of behavioral intervention delivered (cognitive behavioral therapy [CBT], biofeedback, relaxation, other), the headache type being treated, duration of treatment, adherence, and outcomes obtained by the trials to examine the overall feasibility of electronic behavioral interventions for headache. Results: Our search produced 291 results from which 23 eligible articles were identified. Fourteen studies used the internet via the computer, 2 used Personal Digital Assistants, 2 used CD ROM and 5 used other types of devices. None used smartphones or wearable devices. Four were pilot studies (N ≤ 10) which assessed feasibility. For the behavioral intervention, CBT was used in 11 (48 %) of the studies, relaxation was used in 8 (35 %) of the studies, and biofeedback was used in 5 (22 %) of the studies. The majority of studies (14/23, 61 %) used more than one type of behavioral modality. The duration of therapy ranged from 4–8 weeks for CBT with a mean of 5.9 weeks. The duration of other behavioral interventions ranged from 4 days to 60 months. Outcomes measured varied widely across the individual studies. Conclusions: Despite the move toward individualized medicine and mHealth, the current literature shows that most studies using electronic behavioral intervention for the treatment of headache did not use mobile devices. The studies examining mobile devices showed that the behavioral interventions that employed them were acceptable to patients. Data are limited on the dose required, long term efficacy, and issues related to the security and privacy of this health data. This study was registered at the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42015032284) (Prospero, 2015).

KW - Behavioral medicine

KW - Biofeedback

KW - Cognitive behavioral therapy

KW - Electronic

KW - Headache

KW - Migraine

KW - Progressive muscle relaxation therapy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84971280271&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84971280271&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s10194-016-0608-y

DO - 10.1186/s10194-016-0608-y

M3 - Review article

C2 - 27160107

AN - SCOPUS:84971280271

VL - 17

JO - The journal of headache and pain

JF - The journal of headache and pain

SN - 1129-2369

IS - 1

M1 - 51

ER -